If you want a man in charge, I'm your man. If you want a woman in charge, you can keep the one you got. If you want u/Buttoucha9k to be mod, vote for him.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
You are the one who invoked God's name, so I gave you His words about it.
This is and has been a forum for people of all belief systems.
It may be your intention to have this forum for people of all belief systems, but when you appeal to your religion to baselessly accuse me of being a terrorist because I'm outside your religion.... It definitely doesn't feel like you're welcoming to people who don't believe like you.
Regardless of your religious convictions, a Conspiracy forum should strive to provide some kind evidence for claims that people can evaluate and explore. If you've been modding this way, maybe that's why you haven't got engagement on your roundtable and documentary requests. There's not much to engage when a belief is final, unexplorable, and unchangeable just because you sincerely believe it.
My suspicions of your terrorism are from a sixth sense about trollign tone-ations.
Again, you brought God into this and I welcome it and I have no need to hide from my beliefs.
You didn't say you suspected me of being a terrorist, you asserted it as a fact. That's an extreme personal attack to base solely on your sixth sense (personal feelings) that I'm a troll without any kind of evidence to support the accusation.
You didn't deal with what I presented, that I am calling for a vote on whether or not to keep you as a mod. You just dismissed and personally attacked me, immediately going to one of the most extreme accusations you could make about someone.
That's not a healthy way to mod. It's not good for the community here if you're just going on your personal feelings without any kind of supporting evidence or reasons people can interact with. A Conspiracy forum should be where people present their suspicions and beliefs with some kind of reasoning why they think that way or anything at all that would enable others to investigate those suspicions and discuss it.
Your friend SwampRangers told someone "Anyone can post relevant vote questions at any time, but since she was modded not a soul has proposed a new one. Would you like to try yet another community vote on a simple binary question to see if another option has more traction? You can do that right now."
Can anyone really put forth a community vote about getting another mod or not? Will you allow what your friend is telling people they can do? Looks like SwampRangers said you becoming a mod was an admin decision, and not organic community support. "Because six or seven names were proposed by community members and admin selected from among them. Several community votes were held but there was more nonparticipation than participation." You don't seem to actually have community support, and have banned all those who don't support you. Look at how long your posts about a roundtable discussion and a documentary went without participation. You don't have the support of the community. They're not interacting with you at this point, except for your Christian friend and one guy that replied like 6 days later.
What kind of criteria are you using to establish whether or not you've succeeded or failed at being a good mod for this community? Is it your personal feelings that you're a good mod? Or do you base it off of measurable or observable criteria? As mod, I'd like for everyone to be able to post here and discuss things without fear of being banned for not liking me or believing something not in line with my religious beliefs. With your personal attack at me, I don't feel someone with my religious convictions is welcomed here. This isn't a Christianity forum, it's a Conspiracy forum. This isn't a treat unsupported personal feelings as facts forum. It's a place for questioning, exploring, discussing, arguing, and having vastly different views all jumbled together in a beautiful chaotic mess.
I meant terrorizing the community.
I'm banning disruptive trolls, the community has requested that. I'm also moderating on 3 simple rules.
Votes are easily manipulated so that doesn't work for us here.
Edit: also it's funny you are not a regular member of this community but want to take it over now for some reason.. Suspicious
Thanks for explaining that. ~ As a native German I have tried to look up Conspiracy-definitions that make sense, & yours actually does. I asked to be able to discuss countless AMA facts... all readily available. And was told by Tinae I am free to do so here, but I am Not sure how to start bc. she & I have had too many run-ins & I want to totally AVOID her endlessly jumping down my throat again : which always leaves me confused. SO, I never yet started my post, & may never.