If you want a man in charge, I'm your man. If you want a woman in charge, you can keep the one you got. If you want u/Buttoucha9k to be mod, vote for him.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Sticky it, and let the vote go for a week and whoever wins gets to be the mod. You confident enough in your public support to do that?
š¤£
Negotiating with terroristsā½ Not a chance.
I'm the terrorist? Your God allegedly killed the vast majority of the world in a flood and promised to come back and destroy it with fire next..... Your God's the one that wants people to fear it in order to meet it's standard of being wise and threatens those who don't obey. You worship a terrorist...
Your interpretation of facts is incorrect.
God is not a terrorist, He stopped the terror and will again, soon.
Your accusations of me being a terrorist have no factual basis, and you present no factual basis for your God allegedly stopping terror. Your accusation and argument are purely emotional and devoid of logic and reason.
This is why a new mod is needed. With you thinking like this, this place is going to flop
Note that rhetorical comparison to terrorists is not the same as accusing of terrorism.
Note that all other community questions on the subject proceeded without stickying because there was no active mod.
Note that your digression into theodicy is actually more fitting for a post at c/Atheist, but since it's your post you might get indulged here.
That said, I believe I had asked you to consider that if you were worldbuilding you would have choices to make about life and death. An author does not receive the same moral judgment for "killing" a character as a character has. The author controls the whole world and decides what the characters are, which includes their deaths, and they wouldn't be the same characters without those deaths. The characters however are culpable in their world for acting in ignorance of what is good for them and for killing one another thereby. If the worldbuilder is incapable of making a good decision about what a character's life should be, then there exists no good decision at all and we cannot act like our own decisions (being characters) are better; if anyone is capable of making a good decision then the worldbuilder is. The same is true for decisions about standards of behavior.
I really appreciate your being here and your memes are rather pointed insights about Christianity. You're following a track that many have pursued from exposure to deep theology through doubt, and you have two possible trajectories, either nihilism or peace. As long as you haven't resolved the tension between your moral standards and what you perceive as God's, you are avoiding that final choice. It's possible to choose either at any time, temporarily or permanently, and solve the tension, but while you complain that your standards are good but your creator's standards are not the tension remains.
She called me a terrorist. Then, she said she suspected me of terrorism. That's not a rhetorical comparison. With her as mod, now there can be a stickying of a vote post and more formal vote. Are you going to support my bid for her to sticky a vote post for a week for people to vote for me, her, or Buttoucha9k for mod or not?