One or multiple of these options are true- 1- I have bad eyesight
2- attorney general Pam Bondi is mossad so she removed name of Barak, mileikovsky, olmert and Israeli businessmen from this 'list' /''compilation', also known as 'flat earther muddying the water attempt'
3- i got it from right wing deplorable trolls so maybe catturd edit out name coz mossad
I don't understand. Barak (2nd column of OP) and Netanyahu are among the 305 names. Why should the omission of Olmert be an issue?
It is clear that these names were selected by self-defined criteria in accord with the text of the EFTA, which allows a number of dodges and omissions while remaining legally compliant. For instance, the list is ambiguous about whether George H. W. Bush is intended to be included or not, because it only refers to both "George W. Bush" and "George Bush Jr."; this is a prima facie fault. Also a couple names are misspelled and a couple are alphabetized arbitrarily, which is also a prima facie fault. These indicate that the list is not defined by number of appearances but by secret, unpublished scoring methods that can be considered compliant with the law. Presumably by these criteria Olmert, and many others of many nations, didn't rise to the sufficient level of making the "official" list.
Is there statistical or situational evidence that omissions of names of one nation or category (other than US) are imbalanced with respect to their appearance in the files? It should be a simple matter for noticers to compare occurrences of unique names versus their inclusion or exclusion in the 305 names, which means your proposition is easily testable for truth or falsity. But is anyone doing this?
Presumably by these criteria Olmert, and many others of many nations, didn't rise to the sufficient level of making the "official" list
How could that be? why don't you ask the question of why is Ehud Olmert linked to Epstein instead. Even The Jerusalem Post raised the issue a year ago in the article "Former PM Ehud Olmert mentioned as one of Jeffrey Epstein's associates in case documents": https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-844177
And in your opinion who determines the 'sufficient level of making the "official" list'?
Obviously Bondi interprets the law administratively.
I have no problem with all kinds of world leaders being linked, Norway already arrested their leader. I have no problem exposing all degrees. Feel free to focus on Olmert et al. with public revelations. But a list has to have a cutoff or else a million occurrences of "Donald" will be held probative. Evidence that Bondi's list is imbalanced is easy to come by, as is evidence that it's balanced, I'm surprised nobody's published such an analysis yet.
Obviously Bondi interprets the law administratively
This may be obvious to you, but not to many others. Others may dare to believe a foreign entity, or a Jewish Cabal is behind what is or is not being released regarding Epstein. At the very least, why wouldn't you question if perhaps Pam Bondi is the puppet on the end of the strings held by an evil entity?
Colonel Edward M. House, adviser to President Woodrow Wilson, wrote a book showing how easy is to leverage a scandal, or dirt, on any politician and influence the outcomes of decision making. This was way before Epstein was even born.
wouldn't you question if perhaps Pam Bondi is the puppet on the end of the strings held by an evil entity?
I do question it. Yet, legally she is responsible and accepts that responsibility. If she chose that responsibility as the lesser of two evils, she is responsible for not seeking the good. Evidence for the puppetry is worth considering on all sides.
My extended theory is that the Trump administration is not 100% unfriendly to the former or latter cabal, with a combination of proper and misplaced mercy. The current steps often play into the hands of the latter cabal and require us to be more diligent than we were in exposing the former. They will be recognized by greater pattern matching, for which we now have much greater capacity as sovereign individuals. A quibble about 2 names out of 305 will be too small a pattern to be important.
I started warning people about House's work about 20 years ago; I just named him earlier today (click my name). Here I added that his father got rich off Civil War profiteering with Jewish bank assistance so he was well placed, and continued to be so into the 32nd-degree administration. Certainly the cabals in all ages contribute patterns to be matched. But most of the pattern matching we do here is epicentral rather than central.
At any rate, (1) Christians serve Jesus, (2) within that Americans serve the Constitution that names him Lord of the year 1787, (3) within that Bondi is "bond" of/by the EFTA and interprets it administratively. No cabal, spirit, exousia, or confederacy can gainsay that because it is authorized straight from Jesus. It can only be twisted or driven off course. For instance, objective data might falsifiably show that Bondi cheated in her interpretations and spin-doctored the results. But evidence indicates this administration put many man-years of labor into preventing that from happening, i.e., the list is objectively defensible. If one is going to pin more Epstein linkage on Olmert or anyone beyond what the files show, it'll need to be frog research rather than admin evidence.
Add: Let's consider the current status as it informs us of the latter cabal. The former cabal invested trillions in control and has had billions in losses since. The amount of effort required to unmask it led a powerful state actor (presumably the US military) to determine that its best path was to allow a selected leader to be exiled for 4 years for the plan to succeed. If we were to question that datum, the alternate idea would be that the actor and the cabal cowrote a narrative where it only looks like progress on unmasking is happening but the actor eventually releases 3 million pages of evidence and yet nothing earth-shaking is really in the works. In that complicity narrative, the arrests and executions would be perfunctory and minimal and would merely be bit-part sacrifices where the cabal allows its own to be eaten while it carries on business as usual. In the actual war narrative, the difference would be that the arrests and executions clearly demonstrate the end of a cabal and not a transference, that the behaviors such as trafficking are markedly abandoned, that American individual dedication to justice contributes to a continuing state of self-maintenance against the risks of abandonment of potential victims by the community via its overcompensating oscillation toward individualism.
That would give us a test rubric for what actually happens and how much it favors either of two poles of a scenario. More important, it informs our role as sovereigns in contributing to the prevention of satanic abuse in the future in local and global settings. Between America's actions as government and its actions as sovereigns, we must be Jesus's hands and feet to the abused. When he returns he will show which of us have been his adopted body in the absence of his natural body. So part of "occupying until he comes" involves testing admin pronouncements with some capacity for criticism; but defeating the cabal complex for all time requires committing to pursue truth at all costs, and an imbalanced focus on one or two details, especially those already naturally imbalanced by prior trends, is much less helpful than direct propagation of testable truths via facts and logic.
Evidence for the puppetry is worth considering on all sides
What sides are you talking about?
the former or latter cabal
No idea what you mean by this. What is "former cabal" and what is "latter cabal"?
his father got rich off Civil War profiteering with Jewish bank assistance so he was well placed, and continued to be so into the 32nd-degree administration
Who are you talking about?
Certainly the cabals in all ages
Obviously we're not on the same page. To me there is only one Cabal, you know the one George Carlin was talking about. He calls it the Big Club. Clearly you're talking about something else.
Sure, sorry if I was too cryptic. There's always one cabal but, looking at Carroll Quigley's description of Cecil Rhodes's will, we find that it's set up to play subsets of itself against each other to achieve temporary objectives: (1) sacrifice whole groups to itself to scare everyone, (2) avoid detection of interconnection, and (3) allow each group to think it's the innermost "circle" and each leader to think he can be the final antichrist. So the cabal has lots of names over the ages even though the human and spiritual connection keeps the whole thing as one operation.
I implied that the various "sides" we see (especially left-right) each have their puppets and hidden hands, and so I'm open to data of cabalism on any side. I'm secure in Jesus, who said whoever's not with him is against him, and so it's safe to call the cabal "antichrist" or "satanic" as a general category before getting into the subsets (the hydra heads). Knowing the fact of internal tensions and occasional sacrificial virgins among the cabal (I don't need one because Jesus is already the only sacrificial virgin I need), I use the terms "former" and "latter" cabals to indicate the segment that appears to be dying right now (identified with the Alwaleed, Rothschild, and Soros families) and whatever of the cabal remains as it's sacrificing that dying wing. Since I cannot know 100% whether Trump is breaking cleanly from that group or whether Trump is secretly harboring a new subset that will reassert itself in time, I leave both options open. But even if Trump isn't harboring anyone it is prophesied that the cabal will resurface with strength again and we must always be prepared for it.
I was affirming your data on Edward House and pointing out that I and others have connected that to other aspects of the cabal. House's father indeed got rich off Civil War profiteering with Jewish bank assistance, because to get a Civil War you needed a protectionist north and a south that was willing to break embargoes and ship illegally, and if European banks funded both they funded unrest. So Edward House was born with the silver spoon because his father made tons of secret money off these embargoes and illegal product movements. This gave him time to plot the takeover of the presidency, to set up Wilson for success and to be his "second soul", to destabilize czarist Russia, and to bring in Paul Warburg's design, outlined at Jekyll Island in 1910 but developed as it wended through Congress, for the Federal Reserve. Once everyone knew the Americans were collateralized to allow a destructive Great War, it was a simple matter to "organize crowds" until one of them providentially shot an archduke or something and all war talk could be turned to deeds. Then the League of Nations (most of the 14 Points) successfully brought much globalist agenda into reality.
When the powers realized it wasn't enough, they took advantage of another slow presidency to set up popular support for FDR so that another war could be collateralized (by a Victory Tax, which rolled into personal income tax by 1944). FDR was reportedly a 32nd-degree Mason and also the 32nd president. Interestingly, as soon as he started picking a Cabinet FDR sent his advisers to meet the aging Edward House to get his latest thoughts on the world stage. That's how WWII finished many things WWI couldn't do, and the League became the UN. So all that was to affirm that your putting House as a central figure really does connect far backwards and forwards to other aspects (subsets) of the same cabal.
subsets of itself against each other to achieve temporary objectives
Sorry, I don't share your opinion. The right-left divide is a Masonic charade. Only designed to give us the illusion we have a choice, thus freedom. We don't. Freemasons are on both sides.
I implied that the various "sides" we see (especially left-right) each have their puppets and hidden hands, and so I'm open to data of cabalism on any side
As far as I'm concerned there are only two sides and those are, THEM and Humanity. Nothing else. Sure, there are lots of puppets, paid actors out there ready & willing to make a buck.
One or multiple of these options are true- 1- I have bad eyesight 2- attorney general Pam Bondi is mossad so she removed name of Barak, mileikovsky, olmert and Israeli businessmen from this 'list' /''compilation', also known as 'flat earther muddying the water attempt' 3- i got it from right wing deplorable trolls so maybe catturd edit out name coz mossad
Which mileikowsky are you referring to, Benjamin or Javier?
I don't understand. Barak (2nd column of OP) and Netanyahu are among the 305 names. Why should the omission of Olmert be an issue?
It is clear that these names were selected by self-defined criteria in accord with the text of the EFTA, which allows a number of dodges and omissions while remaining legally compliant. For instance, the list is ambiguous about whether George H. W. Bush is intended to be included or not, because it only refers to both "George W. Bush" and "George Bush Jr."; this is a prima facie fault. Also a couple names are misspelled and a couple are alphabetized arbitrarily, which is also a prima facie fault. These indicate that the list is not defined by number of appearances but by secret, unpublished scoring methods that can be considered compliant with the law. Presumably by these criteria Olmert, and many others of many nations, didn't rise to the sufficient level of making the "official" list.
Is there statistical or situational evidence that omissions of names of one nation or category (other than US) are imbalanced with respect to their appearance in the files? It should be a simple matter for noticers to compare occurrences of unique names versus their inclusion or exclusion in the 305 names, which means your proposition is easily testable for truth or falsity. But is anyone doing this?
How could that be? why don't you ask the question of why is Ehud Olmert linked to Epstein instead. Even The Jerusalem Post raised the issue a year ago in the article "Former PM Ehud Olmert mentioned as one of Jeffrey Epstein's associates in case documents": https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-844177
And in your opinion who determines the 'sufficient level of making the "official" list'?
Obviously Bondi interprets the law administratively.
I have no problem with all kinds of world leaders being linked, Norway already arrested their leader. I have no problem exposing all degrees. Feel free to focus on Olmert et al. with public revelations. But a list has to have a cutoff or else a million occurrences of "Donald" will be held probative. Evidence that Bondi's list is imbalanced is easy to come by, as is evidence that it's balanced, I'm surprised nobody's published such an analysis yet.
This may be obvious to you, but not to many others. Others may dare to believe a foreign entity, or a Jewish Cabal is behind what is or is not being released regarding Epstein. At the very least, why wouldn't you question if perhaps Pam Bondi is the puppet on the end of the strings held by an evil entity?
Colonel Edward M. House, adviser to President Woodrow Wilson, wrote a book showing how easy is to leverage a scandal, or dirt, on any politician and influence the outcomes of decision making. This was way before Epstein was even born.
I do question it. Yet, legally she is responsible and accepts that responsibility. If she chose that responsibility as the lesser of two evils, she is responsible for not seeking the good. Evidence for the puppetry is worth considering on all sides.
My extended theory is that the Trump administration is not 100% unfriendly to the former or latter cabal, with a combination of proper and misplaced mercy. The current steps often play into the hands of the latter cabal and require us to be more diligent than we were in exposing the former. They will be recognized by greater pattern matching, for which we now have much greater capacity as sovereign individuals. A quibble about 2 names out of 305 will be too small a pattern to be important.
I started warning people about House's work about 20 years ago; I just named him earlier today (click my name). Here I added that his father got rich off Civil War profiteering with Jewish bank assistance so he was well placed, and continued to be so into the 32nd-degree administration. Certainly the cabals in all ages contribute patterns to be matched. But most of the pattern matching we do here is epicentral rather than central.
At any rate, (1) Christians serve Jesus, (2) within that Americans serve the Constitution that names him Lord of the year 1787, (3) within that Bondi is "bond" of/by the EFTA and interprets it administratively. No cabal, spirit, exousia, or confederacy can gainsay that because it is authorized straight from Jesus. It can only be twisted or driven off course. For instance, objective data might falsifiably show that Bondi cheated in her interpretations and spin-doctored the results. But evidence indicates this administration put many man-years of labor into preventing that from happening, i.e., the list is objectively defensible. If one is going to pin more Epstein linkage on Olmert or anyone beyond what the files show, it'll need to be frog research rather than admin evidence.
Add: Let's consider the current status as it informs us of the latter cabal. The former cabal invested trillions in control and has had billions in losses since. The amount of effort required to unmask it led a powerful state actor (presumably the US military) to determine that its best path was to allow a selected leader to be exiled for 4 years for the plan to succeed. If we were to question that datum, the alternate idea would be that the actor and the cabal cowrote a narrative where it only looks like progress on unmasking is happening but the actor eventually releases 3 million pages of evidence and yet nothing earth-shaking is really in the works. In that complicity narrative, the arrests and executions would be perfunctory and minimal and would merely be bit-part sacrifices where the cabal allows its own to be eaten while it carries on business as usual. In the actual war narrative, the difference would be that the arrests and executions clearly demonstrate the end of a cabal and not a transference, that the behaviors such as trafficking are markedly abandoned, that American individual dedication to justice contributes to a continuing state of self-maintenance against the risks of abandonment of potential victims by the community via its overcompensating oscillation toward individualism.
That would give us a test rubric for what actually happens and how much it favors either of two poles of a scenario. More important, it informs our role as sovereigns in contributing to the prevention of satanic abuse in the future in local and global settings. Between America's actions as government and its actions as sovereigns, we must be Jesus's hands and feet to the abused. When he returns he will show which of us have been his adopted body in the absence of his natural body. So part of "occupying until he comes" involves testing admin pronouncements with some capacity for criticism; but defeating the cabal complex for all time requires committing to pursue truth at all costs, and an imbalanced focus on one or two details, especially those already naturally imbalanced by prior trends, is much less helpful than direct propagation of testable truths via facts and logic.
What sides are you talking about?
No idea what you mean by this. What is "former cabal" and what is "latter cabal"?
Who are you talking about?
Obviously we're not on the same page. To me there is only one Cabal, you know the one George Carlin was talking about. He calls it the Big Club. Clearly you're talking about something else.
Sure, sorry if I was too cryptic. There's always one cabal but, looking at Carroll Quigley's description of Cecil Rhodes's will, we find that it's set up to play subsets of itself against each other to achieve temporary objectives: (1) sacrifice whole groups to itself to scare everyone, (2) avoid detection of interconnection, and (3) allow each group to think it's the innermost "circle" and each leader to think he can be the final antichrist. So the cabal has lots of names over the ages even though the human and spiritual connection keeps the whole thing as one operation.
I implied that the various "sides" we see (especially left-right) each have their puppets and hidden hands, and so I'm open to data of cabalism on any side. I'm secure in Jesus, who said whoever's not with him is against him, and so it's safe to call the cabal "antichrist" or "satanic" as a general category before getting into the subsets (the hydra heads). Knowing the fact of internal tensions and occasional sacrificial virgins among the cabal (I don't need one because Jesus is already the only sacrificial virgin I need), I use the terms "former" and "latter" cabals to indicate the segment that appears to be dying right now (identified with the Alwaleed, Rothschild, and Soros families) and whatever of the cabal remains as it's sacrificing that dying wing. Since I cannot know 100% whether Trump is breaking cleanly from that group or whether Trump is secretly harboring a new subset that will reassert itself in time, I leave both options open. But even if Trump isn't harboring anyone it is prophesied that the cabal will resurface with strength again and we must always be prepared for it.
I was affirming your data on Edward House and pointing out that I and others have connected that to other aspects of the cabal. House's father indeed got rich off Civil War profiteering with Jewish bank assistance, because to get a Civil War you needed a protectionist north and a south that was willing to break embargoes and ship illegally, and if European banks funded both they funded unrest. So Edward House was born with the silver spoon because his father made tons of secret money off these embargoes and illegal product movements. This gave him time to plot the takeover of the presidency, to set up Wilson for success and to be his "second soul", to destabilize czarist Russia, and to bring in Paul Warburg's design, outlined at Jekyll Island in 1910 but developed as it wended through Congress, for the Federal Reserve. Once everyone knew the Americans were collateralized to allow a destructive Great War, it was a simple matter to "organize crowds" until one of them providentially shot an archduke or something and all war talk could be turned to deeds. Then the League of Nations (most of the 14 Points) successfully brought much globalist agenda into reality.
When the powers realized it wasn't enough, they took advantage of another slow presidency to set up popular support for FDR so that another war could be collateralized (by a Victory Tax, which rolled into personal income tax by 1944). FDR was reportedly a 32nd-degree Mason and also the 32nd president. Interestingly, as soon as he started picking a Cabinet FDR sent his advisers to meet the aging Edward House to get his latest thoughts on the world stage. That's how WWII finished many things WWI couldn't do, and the League became the UN. So all that was to affirm that your putting House as a central figure really does connect far backwards and forwards to other aspects (subsets) of the same cabal.
Sorry, I don't share your opinion. The right-left divide is a Masonic charade. Only designed to give us the illusion we have a choice, thus freedom. We don't. Freemasons are on both sides.
As far as I'm concerned there are only two sides and those are, THEM and Humanity. Nothing else. Sure, there are lots of puppets, paid actors out there ready & willing to make a buck.