Old name.....plato's cave
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (3)
sorted by:
The Matrix is not something we have just discovered. People were aware of consciousness for a long time. How consciousness works is this; it's an infinite dimensional consciousness. So this is what happens, your consciousness is expanding infinitely into the universe. As you can see at one level you are by yourself, so your consciousness is unique to you. But at another level is that you're connecting with someone else. And then you're connected to another person. And you go on and on until you connect with everything. So within your consciousness there is a capacity to connect with the entire universe.
Different philosophers throughout history have tried to figure out how to best articulate this truth, this great secret to humanity. And the best metaphor that we have is something called Plato's allegory of the cave, or Plato's cave. And this helps us understand who we are, where we came from, and where we're going. So this allegory helps us understand what it means to be human and the human condition.
Aka there's nothing new (neo) under the sun...
a) Each person can become aware of being per (by) sonos (sound)...while a plural (people) confines singular (person) into a lack of self awareness.
b) Con (together) scio (to perceive)...the former implies a synthesis; the latter analysis. Few suggest a collective consciousness aka gestalt intelligence aka hive mind aka consensus to tempt many into ignoring that each ones perception can only work within singularity (all perceivable).
The separation of all (perceivable) into each one (perception) implies an analytical process allowing each one to become aware of all...or be deceived by one another, depending on each ones free will of choice.
Di (to divide) mens (mind) ion (action) al (all) aka all action dividing into each ones reacting mind aka infinite (perceivable) dividing into finite (perception).
Any added level buries ones sight deeper into ignorance. Level implies balance; being implies choice in-between balance, while any added level imbalances choice. Setting levels on top of a central position implies an inverted pyramid, which buries the all seeing eye.
If level implies balance, then how could there be another balance for ones choice? Balance implies before choice, while another implies after one...
Which power came first...that which sets one apart from one another or ones choice to connect together with another?
What if entire (motion) generates capacity (momentum) for each partial (matter)? What if another partial suggests a connection to shortcut ones capacity?
What if artifice can only be shaped within nature? What if suggested words represent the articulation of perceivable sound within nature?
What if both truth and lie represent artificial, while only change implies natural? What's true about change, and what's a lie about change?
Philo (to love) sophy (knowledge). If one chooses love (philo), then one shapes a conflict against hate (miso)...a conflict within which different sides are equalizing each other.
What if few suggest philo (love) and miso (hate) to distract one from being at the edge (choice) of known (balance)? What if choosing a side imbalances choice?
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics
Secret/seco - "to divide" + hu/hue - "color" aka light generating spectrum to divide each ray from one another. That's how the hue of man comes into being, while being forwarded within the division of light into a visible spectrum.
To understand implies "standing-under" aka student under teacher; many under few; followers under leader; voters under representative; commonwealth under sovereign; slaves under master aka ones choice within a consensus under a chosen ones suggestion.
Few suggest WE to tempt many together... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we
Came from motion into matter; going from matter into motion...the entire process implies transformation aka a transfer of form (life) within action (inception towards death).