Only a true COMMUNIST would fight for taking away an individuals right to police themselves in favor of the "community" ("mod" cons) cop who are easily corrupted and wield control far beyond that which they should. You're a commie and deny it or you're too dense to realize it. I BELIEVE you fall into the former.
Aren't you admitting to that which you deny with your non argument childish comment/taunt? What, starting to feel irritated? This is a civil conversation about something quite important. What would you suggest as a fix for this since you're obviously flexing (mod cons salivating); Add another rule? The "muh uncomfy feelings" protection act! Or the, "mommy, he called me a commie" rule!!! I'm right about you and the con. Not defending against my argument is as good as an admission.
you're looking for a fight i'm too elevated to have. I never said I have all the answers. and i'm not irritated at all, this is entertainment for me at this point because you're a stubborn bull
I'm looking for an honest answer which you are incapable of providing which answers my question. Stubborn bull? Maybe we should create a rule for the disallowance of this kind of attack as well? Shall we defer to the "mod" con?
Only a true COMMUNIST would fight for taking away an individuals right to police themselves in favor of the "community" ("mod" cons) cop who are easily corrupted and wield control far beyond that which they should. You're a commie and deny it or you're too dense to realize it. I BELIEVE you fall into the former.
I BELIEVE you'll never know. aren't you acquiescing to the communist rule by posting? boycott or whatever
Aren't you admitting to that which you deny with your non argument childish comment/taunt? What, starting to feel irritated? This is a civil conversation about something quite important. What would you suggest as a fix for this since you're obviously flexing (mod cons salivating); Add another rule? The "muh uncomfy feelings" protection act! Or the, "mommy, he called me a commie" rule!!! I'm right about you and the con. Not defending against my argument is as good as an admission.
you're looking for a fight i'm too elevated to have. I never said I have all the answers. and i'm not irritated at all, this is entertainment for me at this point because you're a stubborn bull
I'm looking for an honest answer which you are incapable of providing which answers my question. Stubborn bull? Maybe we should create a rule for the disallowance of this kind of attack as well? Shall we defer to the "mod" con?