Which one?
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Big Bang for sure. Leonard Hofstadter (Johnny Galecki) and Sheldon Cooper (Jim Parsons), both physicists at Caltech, said so.
Why can't anyone explain dark matter?
Dark matter is super funny. They look at the observable universe, realize it doesn’t make sense based on our understanding of gravity, so they just say hey 60% of the universe is a magic invisible matter that you can’t see, can’t touch, and if you even got close it would blow up violently so don’t even think about it
My crazy, half baked theory is that the background radiation in one universe, is the other side of a black hole in another universe.
That's a paraphrase of the theory of James Hartle, who is so smart that he got first billing for the Hartle-Hawking function.
This universe is so wonky that it needed a secondary universe that appeared and disappeared in an instant in the Big Bang that would allow quantum tunneling to create this persistent universe.
But even Hartle couldn't explain dark matter. It doesn't exist. It's a math mistake that comes from the assumption of lightspeed invariance, which is rejected by the growing alternative called stochastic electrodynamics (SED). The error arises from believing in an old universe, and then wondering why galaxies still stick together so nicely instead of being random as the old-earth theory predicts: it yields the wrong total mass calculation and so new dark entities are invoked to explain the error away. If you reject the assumptions of new quantum physics conspiratorially circulated by Bohr, SED allows all phenomena to be explained without quantum uncertainty and without epicycles. Then the unexplained unexpected attraction is explained easily by the accretion theory of coalition of plasma strands that also accounts for why all spiral galaxies haven't self-randomized.
Genesis Creation is the only big bang that works. As pointed out in this thread, all other theories have an age crisis in which the stars are older than the universe containing them. "13.7 billion" is a compromise number that assumes that one or more calculations leading to the compromise are mistaken and the error will appear in time and refine the number. Well, maybe the number is .000006 billion as consistent with Joao Magueijo's CDK proposal.
u/MO-Carpenter
Good question. Maybe someone in this forum could provide an answer.
Did you see my reply?
We've been answering it pretty well here. Dark matter and dark energy have no evidence and don't exist but are invented to patch up math errors in BBT. When you correct invalid lightspeed assumptions as needed, as newly shown last month by the lensing of Supernova Ares et al., using a plasma origin model and accretion theory under SED, the mass math works correctly without any epicyclic fudging (and with no uncertainty). Let me know what you want to know specifically.
u/cyberrigger
In the mid-1800s physicist James Clerk Maxwell introduced his Maxwell's equations, ways of measuring electric and magnetic fields in a vacuum. Maxwell's equations fixed the electric and magnetic properties of empty space, and after noting that the speed of a massless electromagnetic radiation wave was very close to the supposed speed of light, Maxwell suggested they might match exactly. It turns out Maxwell was right, and for the first time we could measure the speed of light based on other constants in the Universe. The speed of light in a vacuum is 299,792,458 metres per second, a figure scientists agreed on in 1975 and has to be exact.
And the exact coordinates of the Great Pyramid of Giza are 29.9792458°N, 31.1342880°E.