A lesser known conspiracy is that the original humans were called Cro Magnon.
Cro Magnon evolved from the Lemur. Sasquatch is a legit ETI that evolved from the Giant Lemur so we are like brothers.
Sasquatch are actually more evolved, intelligent, kinder and more spiritual than Humans. They are native to Earth and other planets too just like humans. They believe in Jesus as they were on Earth hidden away as they are now during Jesus' era.
The reason they are in hiding is because the deep state reptilian faction put out a genocide order on them long ago. They even used their tricks to turn humans against Sasquatch even though it was all based on lies.
This led to many Sasquatch deaths causing them to go into hiding in the woods.
Sasquatch is an older race so they have developed shapeshifting abilities like the reptilians and they usually like to shift into panther or tiger like animals.
In prehistoric times, there was a massive war called the 5 planet war where Sasquatch would fight Reptilians and their key kill shot was ripping their heads off since the neck is a weak spot. The war was partially on Mars and a neighboring planet that exploded causing the asteroid belt. Mars had an atmosphere on it that got ripped away. The satellites show that someone made a statue of a face on Mars and that statue was actually made by Sasquatch after the war.
Sasquatch would love to reunite with humans but are afraid of getting shot. They have a radar detector in their consciousness that goes out 3 miles so they always know who is around them and can easily hide. They can also shift into the 2nd dimension making them invisible just as reptilians do (they actually exposed this in the "they live" movie when reptilians would become invisible to hide).
The way evolution works is that the pregnant mother has twins (male and female) causing the birth of a new species with new DNA. Yes, both evolution and God are real.
The Giant Lemurs had Sasquatch, the regular lemur had humans and another regular lemur had the monkey race but the monkey race came out retarded due to some issue in their DNA.
About 12,000 years ago in the age of Atlantis, the original Illuminati (named Illuminated Ones) created the first Police Force using reptilians with triangle badges with an eye in the middle of the badge. The cult leader who ran it had a superweapon that he eventually used causing Atlantis and Lemeria to sink. The superweapon caused most of the hair off humans to fall off due to a genetic defect turning humans from cro magnon to neanderthal. Neanderthals later evolved to homosapiens.
Research relying on the Urantia Book has several published irreconcilable scientific errors. Research relying on the Bible has been charged with some errors but has reconciliations of all charges. If we can agree on an external standard by judging errors then we can get at the truth.
Adam was said to have been formed from the earth, which would make him the first of his kind because not a reproduction of another kind. There is no evidence that something was hidden from this account. Gen. 5 says Adam had many sons and daughters. This fact accounts for Cain having a wife and for him founding a city and calling the region Nod (there is no evidence of Nodites before Cain). Textual evidence can be judged by historical analysis.
As for scientific evidence, I appreciate your laying out what makes sense to you. You do recognize that the unique origin of each species with its own DNA barcode is such an improbable event that it could not have happened by a gradual process of natural selection, so we agree on the principle of punctuation in origin of species, contrary to Darwin. However, since these events are improbable, it is just as improbable that it happened in the womb via DNA rewriting as it happened in the earth via fresh DNA assembly. Since you reject Darwin on natural selection, there's no need to compromise with him on other points.
Science teaches that the Big Bang was already superheated. The CMB map shows how early Big Bang matter was distributed in fluctuating pockets. As matter coalesced these pockets of greater mass took on plasma form and transferred the fine CMB structure into clusters and then galaxies (accretion hypothesis). This is sufficient for the creation of the first stars. However, the exaggerated time scale due to the assumption of lightspeed invariance forced scientists to create special pleading for the creation of stars after the Big Bang because no stars today meet their criteria for original creation (only hypothetical Population III stars would have been original, but none exist). Therefore this imaginative narrative of nebular fireballs was templated over this, even though no such thing could be observed with current science (we can only observe snapshots and draw inferences, and one inferential narrative has no inherent benefit over another). In the plasma phase, elements were created in proportion to the likelihood of their creation criteria (C/O and heavier atoms have narrow criteria unlike H/He); this accounts sufficiently for the origin of any cluster, galaxy, or system material without adding an inventive fireball narrative.
The accretion of the planets from the solar matter is pretty close to accurate; obviously the distance from the center had a sorting effect that leads to different compositions among the planets and satellites.
It's not necessary for the accretion to take place on particular sides of the sun. Small, irregular asteroids could be formed at the same time as larger bodies. However, the asteroid belt does appear to be the destruction of a larger planet that was originally formed in the coalescing phase.
There's no reason for earth to originate without an atmosphere since the gas giants have deep atmospheres. The special pleading that scientists use to reject original atmosphere is that molecular evolution isn't possible in today's oxidizing atmosphere so they wrote a change into their narrative and imagined asteroid and volcanic ages. But there is no crater evidence of millions of years of bombardment by asteroids; compared to the moon, the evidence is that there was an atmosphere filtering out most asteroids. The earth didn't need to get "hot" either because its core from accretion was already plenty hot, as shown by the formation of tectonic plates by subduction of the molten mantle.
Same.
Evidence that polar regions once had more tropical climate suggests that the original atmosphere had much greater water vapor saturation than present: similar to a rain forest canopy. The past rivers and seas were not as dominant as now, due to this atmosphere and to the potential for massive underground reservoirs to arise during the subduction process (having created Pangaea already). This is not so much nonstop rain as nonstop mist. It's true that the original sea and the cooling land would've negotiated where that land would arise and form initial mountains.
No continental drift is necessary for the origin of life.
Obviously I'd agree abiogenesis is the work of "high level ETI" and you can guess which I mean. It couldn't mathematically have happened without programming (spirituality). And for that reason, each new species could also be the same work from the earth as opposed to work from unfit wombs. The area likely corresponds to the present Mideast-Africa region but the present Caribbean has also been proposed.
No missing links found among plants. No wombs there either.
No missing links found between plants and echinoderms and fish. No wombs there either.
No missing links found between fish and amphibians and reptiles. No wombs there either.
No missing links found between reptiles and pachyderms, and no wombs in reptiles. If you posit that speciation occurred via DNA rewriting in selected individuals in spore or egg form, including both male and female when differentiated, that's just as unlikely a narrative as if these species came from nonliving matter just like the first one did. Again, the scientists go with special pleading because they can't explain how any abiogenesis occurred so they say it occurred only once as if that makes it more likely. But its likelihood is still less by many orders than the lowest possible quantum likelihood of any event in this universe (ca. 1 in 10^140). So you're relying on a narrative contrary to evidence. Since you believe ETI was involved, it may have just as well used the method of abiogenesis that is logically proven to have happened, instead of a sketchy rewrite of one DNA to another completely different code in a womb that is programmed to reject foreign DNA.
No missing links among mammals.
As I said, DNA barcodes prove beyond mathematical doubt that humans cannot mate with other primates. The last chart I looked at showed that chimps, bonobos, and humans are all genetically separated at vast distances, but that ancient humans (Neanderthal and Denisovan) were completely interfertile with modern Homo sapiens.
There's not a significant difference among Cro-Magnon (H. sapiens fossilis, originally), Neanderthal (H. sapiens neanderthalensis), and modern man H. sapiens sapiens); these are differentiations like others among subspecies.
So what's happening is that you're recognizing some aspects where high tech must be involved but also importing other aspects from scientists who don't believe in that high tech. If you cut out the assumptions made by those scientists who attempt to patch up their broken systems with more guesswork narratives, you get a cleaner history. I appreciate your listening.