Is your statement right or wrong?

Ones state of mind implies linear progression...not circular (right vs wrong) conflict.

You want me to believe the picture represents blah blah blah

a) Represent aka "to respond to presented" implies adaptation...believing turns against adaptation by taking something into possession.

b) A picture implies a "capture moment" aka matter artificially holding onto natural momentum of motion. Others then move pictures (movies) to mimic motion, while matter continues to ignore adaptation to momentum, when watching a movie.

You're either...or...

Being implies one (partial) within all (whole)...circular conflict (either vs or ) tempts one to ignore the delineation of singularity.

you believe only some parts of

a) Some (a sum) contradicts parts (each partial).

b) To believe implies partial holding onto partial, thereby shaping a sum...free will of choice implies partial apart from one another, while needing to resist the wanted temptation of summation as to remain free from one another.

c) Only implies all aka the one and only God (from the Christian perspective)...some/sum contradicts one and only.

No.

Again with the point behind nothing...if nothing has an end, then what's the beginning of nothing?

I was mentioning the verb. Not the noun a "magic spell"

The ION (action) in mention implies the origin of anything shaped within...verbs; nouns; adjectives etc.

The trick...a verb implies motion; nouns are attached to matter, while distracting from motion. Spelling nouns to distract from what verbs are implying...that's magic.

blah blah blah

Aka the yiddish "yada yada yada" (idle talk) from babylon/babel (confusion; disorder) + babble (talk like a baby)...a jew domesticates gentiles into build the tower of babel (words) which always collapses upon its foundation (sound).

Notice here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CKyWu87W78 how yada yada yada leaves out the idle talk, yet implicates the noteworthy to a jew. That's why a jew doesn't have to listen to gentiles, since it's mostly yada yada yada aka bla bla bla... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6t8g6ka4W0

Btw: The Gigi D'Agostino clip is based on the comic LA LINEA (the line)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Linea_(TV_series) that's where gentiles are being tricked to shape their bla bla bla within.

S. p. e. l. l. <- THIS is spelling

a) You used free will of choice to choose what to spell...others suggested letters to tempt your free will of choice how to spell.

b) The letters you use are based on the ABC (Latin abecedary)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/abecedary That's the abracadabra utilized by few to cast spells onto many, and those under the spell are confining themselves through spelling from noticing the trick.

c) One spells by letters...others suggest letters to tempt ones free will of choice to LET one spell. Therefore...ones free will of choice represents the LETTER of any spelling by another.

The origin of letting implies all letting each one within wield free will of choice...that's why others have to use letters to tempts ones free will of choice into binding itself by letting.

I don't know where you got the idea that magic is involved here

a) Tempting another to ignore perceivable knowledge for suggested ideals/idols....that's magic.

b) Involvement aka in (within) volve (to turn) ment (mind)...others suggesting ideals/idols to trick ones mind to turn inwardly (logic) and outwardly (reason)...that's magic.

c) Holding up words within sound implies being UNDER THE SPELL, whence ignoring knowledge by seeking understanding.

d) The contradiction found within your descriptions contradict the knowledge moving through each being...free-will-of-choice struggles to free self from contradictions, which allows one to think straight.