DISCLAIMER: Stop whining, this is not "anti-white" it's pro truth. Much of my family is white. Man up and face the facts.
ARGUMENT: People overlook some of the ethnic problems in these African nations. White people freak out at a 5-10% Muslim population, saying it is ruining their country, now imagine a 50% Muslim country and 50% non-muslim. How do you think that will work out? Chaotically or smoothly?
I'm starting to think many white people have a pathological need for blacks to never do well. In Africa they draw their borders in a way that leads to unstable nations. In America when blacks were making great strides post slavery, they were "helped" with welfare by LBJ. Now after generations of welfare and gangster culture which whites helped foster, white people look aghast and say "see these people can never do well. bad genes! bad genes!"
Then in other African nations white people made themselves a separated dominant minority and treat the blacks as second class citizens rather than doing some intelligent integration over time. Then came the predictable communist revolutions against the dominant minority group which led to economic ruin. And once again whites will say "see these blacks didn't know how good they had it as our second class citizens". No neither option was good, take some responsibility for your leadership.
That's not to say Africa would be Wakanda right now if not for white intervention, but let's not act like Europeans gave them a fair shake or treated them well.
As things stabilize somewhat we see some very high performing Africans (my family being among them). People will say "the outliers don't prove the rule". In fact they do, because it is only outliers who progress society technologically and culturally. It's not the average or below average person (like JG5) who gets to take credit for that, though they will try.
Path implies need (linear procession); logic implies want vs not want (circular conflict).
White implies pure light...people implies a summation of impurity. A people can never be pure, since light separates each person from one another. Mixing a people together for purification (equality through diversity) only increases darkness.
In this world...few corrupt much aka "one bad apple can spoil the barrel". Why? Because light reveals; while darkness conceals.
One cannot choose a side without turning against the other. Why? Because choice can only operate within balance.
Hence...pro versus anti.
...because darkness conceals sight within light.
Submission (islam) contradicts purification (white)...light breaches darkness, while tempted to submit to being over-shadowed.
One submission has enough power to corrupt any amount of purity. Example...the Caddyshack joke about corrupting the whole pool with one bar of chocolate. That's a jewish movie joking about shitting in the gene-pool of gentiles.
Isn't it weird that the incoherent bot only "makes sense" when it's defending either Nazism or white nationalism?
Says a lot about who is operating it.
How does writing "a people can never be pure (white)" defends white?
a) Singular consent (-ist) tempted into plural consensus (-ism)...it's a racket.
b) Nazi implies native; national implies native of all aka the status quo of being...suggested naz-ism and national-ism tempts one to ignore that by joining into a consensus with other ones.
Coherence implies "connection; dependence; consistency" aka sticking together with one another...ones free will of choice needs to resist that.
The origin of sense implies being (perception) send (perceivable)...one cannot make anything without ignoring being send within everything already available.
Making implies shaping within; magic implies making others believe in shapes...free-will-of-choice analyzes how make-belief corrupts sense by synthesis.
Free-will-of-choice separates speech others cast into lots aka spell-craft.