Reference: c/Anthroposophy/logs
Anthroposophy: Anthroposophy is a spiritual new religious movement which was founded in the early 20th century by the esotericist Rudolf Steiner that postulates the existence of an objective, intellectually comprehensible spiritual world, accessible to human experience. Followers of anthroposophy aim to engage in spiritual discovery through a mode of thought independent of sensory experience ....
Steiner hoped to form a spiritual movement that would free the individual from any external authority. For Steiner, the human capacity for rational thought would allow individuals to comprehend spiritual research on their own and bypass the danger of dependency on an authority such as himself. Steiner contrasted the anthroposophical approach with both conventional mysticism, which he considered lacking the clarity necessary for exact knowledge, and natural science, which he considered arbitrarily limited to what can be seen, heard, or felt with the outward senses.
Nature of the human being
In Theosophy, Steiner suggested that human beings unite a physical body of substances gathered from and returning to the inorganic world; a life body (also called the etheric body), in common with all living creatures (including plants); a bearer of sentience or consciousness (also called the astral body), in common with all animals; and the ego, which anchors the faculty of self-awareness unique to human beings. Anthroposophy describes a broad evolution of human consciousness. Early stages of human evolution possess an intuitive perception of reality, including a clairvoyant perception of spiritual realities. Humanity has progressively evolved an increasing reliance on intellectual faculties and a corresponding loss of intuitive or clairvoyant experiences, which have become atavistic. The increasing intellectualization of consciousness, initially a progressive direction of evolution, has led to an excessive reliance on abstraction and a loss of contact with both natural and spiritual realities. However, to go further requires new capacities that combine the clarity of intellectual thought with the imagination and with consciously achieved inspiration and intuitive insights.
Anthroposophy speaks of the reincarnation of the human spirit: that the human being passes between stages of existence, incarnating into an earthly body, living on earth, leaving the body behind, and entering into the spiritual worlds before returning to be born again into a new life on earth. After the death of the physical body, the human spirit recapitulates the past life, perceiving its events as they were experienced by the objects of its actions. A complex transformation takes place between the review of the past life and the preparation for the next life. The individual's karmic condition eventually leads to a choice of parents, physical body, disposition, and capacities that provide the challenges and opportunities that further development requires, which includes karmically chosen tasks for the future life. Steiner described some conditions that determine the interdependence of a person's lives, or karma.
How would you like supportive questions to be framed?
Anthropo (man) + sophy (knowledge) aka perceivable knowledge flowing through each mans formed perception.
Spiritual movement implies all animating each ones mind through motion...others suggest new to distract one from the ongoing flow, and religion to bind ones temporary form mentally (ideals) and physically (idols).
Object implies to throw towards... https://www.etymonline.com/word/object
Being (life) thrown (inception towards death) prevents each being from physically perceiving ones inception and death, yet allows mentally discerning ones position in-between.
Both intellect and comprehension tempt ones form to ignore mental discernment within spiritual flow. Why? Because intelligence tempts one to gather and comprehension to seize and hold onto which ignores spiritual animation.
Following another and aiming towards outcome tempts man to ignore the origin of knowledge, hence being animated by it.
Mode/med - "take appropriate measures" confines thought to whatever one took hold of.
Suggested mode (taking suggested) inverts mote (being perception) within motion (perceivable).
Hope binds free will of choice towards outcome; it's TO aka being moved TOWARDS, which implies the spiritual movement which free ones choice from one another.
a) Misusing mind as capacitor tempts one to ignore being a resistor within generation...whose wanted temptation one needs to resist.
b) Ratio aka reason implies circular conflict aka resistor vs resistor, while burdened by capacity, which both sides fight each other over. Being implies within (life) linear (inception towards death) procession, hence the need to resist want.
Suggested mysticism casts a mist over anthropos (man), while suggested scienctism inverts natural scio (to know, to perceive) aka ones perception within all perceivable knowledge.
a) Consenting to any suggestion prevents ones perception from discerning any of this.
b) Being implies essence (life) in-between abstract (inception towards death) aka as above/so below. It's consenting to a suggestion which shapes essence into substance aka standing under another essence.
Ones choice consenting to a chosen ones suggestion implies trans-substantiation of essence.
All implies the process of dying...each one within implies living. Living within the process of dying implies as each singular unit within singularity...others suggest common-ism to tempt ones consenting mind into a plural consensus.
Motion (abstract) > momentum (ether) > matter (essence)...ether also represents the spiritual divination aka the division of animation as well as ether/aidh - "to burn" aka the burned offering (holo-caust).
Anim-al aka all animation for each animated one within...the separation of which is called hue-man (color of man aka spectrum of light/sound).
There's no such thing as "all animals" or a plural of "animal"...only all singular animation for each one within.
Aware implies of one another; self implies through one another...putting self and aware together corrupts uniqueness.
Bearer (inception towards death) of sentience (life) implies all transference of each one within...not what each one carries within self.
Anthroposophy delineates a transfer of discernment in-between a narrow/broad human spectrum, which is why each ones perception can broaden or narrow at will.
Others suggest consciousness to lure perception into a consensus, within which each one evolves (turns) against one another.
Taking into possession evolves (turns) into a conflict aka mine vs yours.
Become implies coming into being aka cause animating effect...suggested attavism tempts effect to ignore cause for affection to one another.
If motion > momentum > matter, then attavism tempts matter to hold onto other matter in hopes of learning how it came into being. Like any other suggested -ism...consenting to it shapes circular thought within linear procession.
Being (life) implies initiated (inception) into a progressive direction (towards death)...which is linear. Evolution tempts a being to move in circles mentally (logic) and physically (reason), while ignoring linear progression, hence history repeating itself.
Aka excessive (life) reliance on abstraction (inception towards death)...abstraction gives access/excess to essence.
Sophy (knowledge) doesn't speak...it moves as perceivable inspiration through each ones perception. Others shape suggestible information into speech to distract from that.
Transfer of form (life) within action (inception towards death) implies a separation from one another...not a weaving (plex) together (com).
Simple implies "free from duplicity; unmixed; one-fold"...the simple mind has to be tricked into complexity aka into burdening itself aka into the synchronicity of sin by mixing ones perception with the suggestion of another.
Away from like vs dislike conflict, which supports nothing but circular confinement, while preventing one from thinking straight.
c/Anthroposophy/logs
Framing questions away from conflict supports straight thinking aka movement towards aka between.