Which is right? Use all arguments that you know of!
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
Whynotboth.jpg
Because that would be a lie. Think about it, they had full power to cut whatever they wanted and they didn't cut welfare at all. They went for targeted cuts at their true enemy, single men and childless adults.
So you're saying immigrants had no such power?
Why do you say these "cuts" did anything to single men?
I'm saying the GOP had a majority to pass whatever horseshit their moronic cult came up with, and what they chose was extremely telling.
Because they did. The entire purpose of the OBBB was to protect the interests of those with children while blaming the debt on "25 year old men playing PlayStation instead of working" as Speaker Johnson said of young men struggling to find work in the shitty MAGA economy where jobs are only being added in female dominant sectors. (Top gainers were hospitality and health care)
Like?
And were those "interests" actually protected or was it ineffective there?
And you believe this is bad because you believe the government shouldn't try to help them?
I blame it on the Fed, IRS, tyranny, and corruption.
Thanks Obummer and biden and foreigners and foreign competition and trash trade agreements.
What about oil drilling?
The GOP? Muh based tranny/whamen/blackerino GOP are supposed to be White Nationalists?
There's no way anyone is that dumb. You're a liar, and that's coming from me.
Why the fuck would White Nationalists cut benefits that help their own society? They aren't Libertarians, basically the opposite.
You clearly don't know what a White Nationalist even is.
Exactly. You're race commies, we know. We also know you're lying about who takes the most out because you never do anything to reduce expenditure except attack single men constantly for "not doing their duty" while you fuck them over for white women's benefit.
You don't want to get rid of the welfare state, you want to run it.