Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

2
Which is right? Use all arguments that you know of! (media.scored.co)
posted 47 days ago by guywholikesDjtof2024 47 days ago by guywholikesDjtof2024 +5 / -5
60 comments share
60 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 [S] 3 points 47 days ago +3 / -0

that they don't deserve

Is there any repeatable, observable, testable, strictly scientific proof for this?

hide behind

Doublethink. That's like saying that shining a light on something is hiding it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 47 days ago +2 / -1
▲ 3 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 [S] 3 points 47 days ago +3 / -0

So you actually believe these so called "White nationalist" want a war or a bunch of people to die.

But what if they don't have any position on that or they want no one dead?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 1 point 46 days ago +2 / -1

You missed the point.

She's arguing that people dying is the worst thing ever (despite the fact that every one of those people will die regardless) while also arguing that killing can be justified in some circumstances.

By her own "logic", if she wants "natalists", or "stormfags", or whomever to die, she should be killed. I've told her just that for years now but she's still here, therefore she doesn't actually hold this position.

Everything she says is in bad faith, which is why I always second guess myself when I find we are making the same point. In cases where I can show to myself that what I think is correct, process of elimination dictates that she's only saying it to push her solutions on people who already agree with the point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 46 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 47 days ago +2 / -1
▲ 3 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 [S] 3 points 47 days ago +3 / -0

How else

Deportations and cutting off welfare and subsidies.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 47 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 47 days ago +1 / -0

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 54gd4 (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy