She's arguing that people dying is the worst thing ever (despite the fact that every one of those people will die regardless) while also arguing that killing can be justified in some circumstances.
By her own "logic", if she wants "natalists", or "stormfags", or whomever to die, she should be killed. I've told her just that for years now but she's still here, therefore she doesn't actually hold this position.
Everything she says is in bad faith, which is why I always second guess myself when I find we are making the same point. In cases where I can show to myself that what I think is correct, process of elimination dictates that she's only saying it to push her solutions on people who already agree with the point.
Is there any repeatable, observable, testable, strictly scientific proof for this?
Doublethink. That's like saying that shining a light on something is hiding it.
So you actually believe these so called "White nationalist" want a war or a bunch of people to die.
But what if they don't have any position on that or they want no one dead?
You missed the point.
She's arguing that people dying is the worst thing ever (despite the fact that every one of those people will die regardless) while also arguing that killing can be justified in some circumstances.
By her own "logic", if she wants "natalists", or "stormfags", or whomever to die, she should be killed. I've told her just that for years now but she's still here, therefore she doesn't actually hold this position.
Everything she says is in bad faith, which is why I always second guess myself when I find we are making the same point. In cases where I can show to myself that what I think is correct, process of elimination dictates that she's only saying it to push her solutions on people who already agree with the point.
Deportations and cutting off welfare and subsidies.