But humanity implies a right to live that they don't deserve. Words do matter, and allowing them to hide behind "that's a bad person", still implying they possess humanity, doesn't work.
Yes. Killing people who wish to start a war that will kill millions is logical.
Pretending they are just "bad" and not a completely mentally unwell cult that needs significant intervention to prevent violent uprising against innocent people by them is hiding it. A thief is "bad", a white nationalist is far more.
Of course they do. How else do they get their "white nation"? People won't just up and leave a country they are legally in and cede all their assets to the regime.
She's arguing that people dying is the worst thing ever (despite the fact that every one of those people will die regardless) while also arguing that killing can be justified in some circumstances.
By her own "logic", if she wants "natalists", or "stormfags", or whomever to die, she should be killed. I've told her just that for years now but she's still here, therefore she doesn't actually hold this position.
Everything she says is in bad faith, which is why I always second guess myself when I find we are making the same point. In cases where I can show to myself that what I think is correct, process of elimination dictates that she's only saying it to push her solutions on people who already agree with the point.
"Natalists" are the only ones who pay taxes, anti-natalists live in their parent's basement until they're 50.
Aside from taxes, natalists produce the next generation of society. Taxes are completely irrelevant if this is the last generation of civilization, which is why anti-natalist opinions on anything don't matter; you're a dead end.
But humanity implies a right to live that they don't deserve. Words do matter, and allowing them to hide behind "that's a bad person", still implying they possess humanity, doesn't work.
Is there any repeatable, observable, testable, strictly scientific proof for this?
Doublethink. That's like saying that shining a light on something is hiding it.
Yes. Killing people who wish to start a war that will kill millions is logical.
Pretending they are just "bad" and not a completely mentally unwell cult that needs significant intervention to prevent violent uprising against innocent people by them is hiding it. A thief is "bad", a white nationalist is far more.
So you actually believe these so called "White nationalist" want a war or a bunch of people to die.
But what if they don't have any position on that or they want no one dead?
Of course they do. How else do they get their "white nation"? People won't just up and leave a country they are legally in and cede all their assets to the regime.
Then they are lying.
You missed the point.
She's arguing that people dying is the worst thing ever (despite the fact that every one of those people will die regardless) while also arguing that killing can be justified in some circumstances.
By her own "logic", if she wants "natalists", or "stormfags", or whomever to die, she should be killed. I've told her just that for years now but she's still here, therefore she doesn't actually hold this position.
Everything she says is in bad faith, which is why I always second guess myself when I find we are making the same point. In cases where I can show to myself that what I think is correct, process of elimination dictates that she's only saying it to push her solutions on people who already agree with the point.
Jewish philosophy, summed up.
Natalist philosophy.
"Natalists" are the only ones who pay taxes, anti-natalists live in their parent's basement until they're 50.
Aside from taxes, natalists produce the next generation of society. Taxes are completely irrelevant if this is the last generation of civilization, which is why anti-natalist opinions on anything don't matter; you're a dead end.
You don't pay taxes, so what are you? Aside from living proof I'm right about natalists.
No taxation without representation, strap-on sucker. For too long we've been leeched off by people like you.
He isn't advocating to raise taxes at all. Nice strawman though.
He literally does. His retarded birth obsessed policy is built around raising other people's taxes.