They finally stopped running this psyop but here were the purposes of them. If they had succeeded, it would have made all our lives much harder because everyone would think of us as dumb ass flat earthers.
-
If people think of us as dumb flat earthers, they would not believe them when we tell them the Gov is involved in conspiracy against the People.
-
Deep State live underground in caverns. They don't want us to know there are good and bad civilizations in inner Earth. The bad ones are Reptilians running very evil and Satanic things underground. The good ones are good people who are so advanced, they were just waiting for us to catch up to the civilized level and we are there now so they want to connect.
-
The more bs people believe in, the harder life gets and they want us to have a hard life.
Well, I use "no evidence" when (a) it cuts against the history I learned (b) the source gives no backup and (c) reasonably diligent search for comparable evidence turns up nothing; for instance there were a couple new Bibles that year but they were all Protestant. I know people abuse counterarguments here, but good arguments do stand on their own.
Yes, you have it right that the Ethiopian church (as I indicated) has the broadest definition of Scripture, and you're looking at an ad that includes a ton of Apocrypha. I use the Charlesworth edition for critical commentary, which includes the 100 most cited apocrypha and pseudepigrapha beyond the deuterocanon, and when necessary I use online Apocrypha. Nothing was deliberately "hidden" about these for the most part; a couple were stupid enough that local governments censored them, but those incidents are minor. It's just that they never obtained the credibility in the first place that the Scriptures obtained over time.
The covenant community is the believers in the Christ of any era (originally known as the Seed of the Woman and finally revealed to be Jesus). The work of the covenant community in recognizing Scripture was essentially complete before its imperial rapprochement of the 320s. All this work can be tested by ordinary methods of truth. u/guywholikesDjtof2024 identifies as a Biblical Christian, as I do, and it's relatively obvious who those are here because we don't hide our identification unlike others; we announce it and allow others to test it. Christians are a "team" I suppose by definition of having all submitted to the person and teaching of Jesus, but that means we can operate independently still knowing the same core. Your familiarity with Christian doctrine indicates you should know this too: I presume that, as you advance gnostic concepts, you're not unfamiliar with the fact that multiple people can be promoting the same message with one heart.
If you wish to continue adopting the role of asking pertinent questions and accepting our patient answers, that's fine too. When you start criticizing, it's appropriate to propose alternatives. Since you reject imperialism as a source of truth (and I'd agree), how could one determine what is true other than by whether it agrees with reality as objectively determinable by the average person? If we are committed to pursue truth at all costs (and who would refuse that), then various proposals for sources of truth can be compared, whether they are individual experience of Logos, an external Golden Rule or set of Commands, or a revelatory message or book. Presumably you don't wish to complain just for complaining's sake, but instead you have a positive suggestion for humanity that you prefer and would propose?