Either you want him to respond because "tee hee he's muh payed shill reee" or you want him not to.
Never one single time has your approach worked. There is exactly zero way to determine who is who except blind faith in reply presence/abscence. Over 99% of the time the person is real. More likely 100.
It always works. The paid shills respond every time because they have to. The regular people who are nevertheless objectively incorrect get mocked when their responses include no on-topic discussion because they’ve conceded that what I said is real.
So can you give 4 examples? You said always, that's quite a large claim.
paid shills have to respond every time
And when they don't, the wishful accusation implodes. I have never seen you retract "paid shill" accusations, suggesting you use this as a way to simply "own the ideological opponent! He he he!".
If you believe shills are still neccesary to deploy on a random obscure platform in 2026, that's just sad.
Also, what if someone was paid to shill for buying birch tree seeds, and they said "Birch trees have leaves!"? Do birch trees no longer have leaves?
"Every site must to have paid shills so I can hand wave claims away!! I need them!!!!" Shills are a crutch for the lazy. They're also costly and cannot focus on everything. If I had to guess assuming there are any, I would guess there are only a total of 1 to 5 paid (and/or NOT-paid) shills on Scored at any given time. They would also target big areas instead of obscure boards their message won't reach.
proven
What's proven is most users are legit. IDK where you've been, but where I've been, it's all legit people all the way down.
Either you want him to respond because "tee hee he's muh payed shill reee" or you want him not to.
Never one single time has your approach worked. There is exactly zero way to determine who is who except blind faith in reply presence/abscence. Over 99% of the time the person is real. More likely 100.
It always works. The paid shills respond every time because they have to. The regular people who are nevertheless objectively incorrect get mocked when their responses include no on-topic discussion because they’ve conceded that what I said is real.
Pretty simple.
So can you give 4 examples? You said always, that's quite a large claim.
And when they don't, the wishful accusation implodes. I have never seen you retract "paid shill" accusations, suggesting you use this as a way to simply "own the ideological opponent! He he he!".
If you believe shills are still neccesary to deploy on a random obscure platform in 2026, that's just sad.
Also, what if someone was paid to shill for buying birch tree seeds, and they said "Birch trees have leaves!"? Do birch trees no longer have leaves?
Don’t act like a shill or don’t act surprised when I call you one. For fuck’s sake, man.
Debunked. He didn't reply. https://communities.win/p/1ARdagd24F/x/c/4eZBeAj3KGG/
Blanket fallacy. Also they have reasons to supprt Trump (over alternatives), it's typically not a blind faith.
Vague.
Debunked. https://communities.win/p/1ARd8aw028/x/c/4eXvaZ6LMX9
"Every site must to have paid shills so I can hand wave claims away!! I need them!!!!" Shills are a crutch for the lazy. They're also costly and cannot focus on everything. If I had to guess assuming there are any, I would guess there are only a total of 1 to 5 paid (and/or NOT-paid) shills on Scored at any given time. They would also target big areas instead of obscure boards their message won't reach.
What's proven is most users are legit. IDK where you've been, but where I've been, it's all legit people all the way down.
Ephesians 4:29