One thing that happens at Scored is autofilters remove links that they don't like. When this happens everyone else sees "Comment removed by spam filter, pending further review." instead of your comment. You can find a log URL that will show the first line of the removed comment ["the origin of man is deliberately being covered up from us They are covering a lot more than you think about the original man. There are [two creation stories of humans in the Bible.](https://4."]. All you need to do is repost it without the link (and possibly tell people less directly how to find the link).
c/Conspiracies has no active moderators; admin names are on the list and they are active but very rarely step in here. So it's a Wild West forum right now. Don't sweat it.
You might be interested to know that basically no readers of Genesis had any problem with creation being told from two perspectives until 19th-century German higher critics came in and started writing theories about how the Bible was contradictory and recent and how nobody needed to believe in God or live morally. Little bit of pandering to their own deviances there. Quite an interesting rabbit hole. Those of us in the 21st century who are still troubled by Biblical accounts are not reading them in their cultural setting. But, as I said, I'm still interested in what the real Truth is as the two accounts have much to say about Reality that is unappreciated by Christianity (notice the movement of gold, for instance) and there is much around the text for us to learn from.
no readers of Genesis had any problem with creation being told from two perspectives
I don't have a problem with inconsistencies in the Bible, it's something I would expect. And anything can be explained to a brainwashed audience. I have an issue with what's not being there (i.e. included in the Bible), for instance 1Enoch, The Book of Jubilees, The Gospel of Thomas, Apocryphon of John, etc. Same jews were censoring then, as their descendants are doing today.
And the Gospel of Thomas is not even a gnostic text and according to many scholars it was written before the Synoptics.
He is also associated with Scott Lively, another evangelical Christian Zionist. As far as I am concerned the Christian Zionists, along with the jews, are responsible for most of the evil and the problems in the world today. Without them there wouldn't be a Rothschild state of Israel in Middle East.
https://www.scottlively.net/swamp-rangers/swamp-rangers-recruiting-office/
he's playing both sides
I disagree with you here. IMO, Christian Zionists are the most brainwashed people of Earth. But, they don't play anything... they just obey. They're puppets on a string. According to Bibi they're "useful idiots".
Good link, there are definitely intentionally different perspectives, but the chart also overextends its case such as giving the impression that "male" and "female" are plural when they aren't.
So we can talk c/FlatEarth (mine) or c/flatearthresearch (another guy's). I love apocryphal writings and they are allowed at c/Christianity (the original Christian forum, where I became the most active mod), but some might prefer c/Faith (mine) or c/ChristianAnarchism (nobody's). A friend just started c/HolySeekersOfTheWay and is open to apocrypha too, that's new so you can propose direction there if you like. There are more.
So I trust you accept James, since he's in Josephus? Note that when James says be a Doer of the Word, Hebrew for doer is Oseh, and I think the best etymological theory is that Osey became Essene. John and Jesus were a lot more Essene than people realize, because there were not just the cave Essenes, but a much broader supporter Essene network that lived in the towns but paid for the cave work to be done. The reason the Essenes vanished is twofold, the cave people couldn't keep up after life changed for everyone in 70, and the town people all became Christians and many of them dutifully headed for the hills in 68 following Jesus's prophecy. So they are a huge strand of the primitive church that (like others, including the Gentile) contributed to what the church was by the time of Polycarp and Irenaeus.
So I trust you accept James, since he's in Josephus
I want to ask you a question. But, first let me answer your question; No I don't trust anyone. They have given James the title "the just" for a reason. He may or may not be the brother of Jesus, but that's irrelevant to me.
And it's Titus Flavius Josephus, but his real name is Joseph ben Matityahu. And yes he's a jew who changed his name, like so many others. They do it today as well. And that brings me to the question.
I know you're a Christian Zionist and here is your website. To me Christian Zionists, especially the ones in America, along with the jews, are responsible for the creation of the state of Israel. Jacob Rothschild bragged that was his family who created Israel, and that may be true from a finance pov, but that's all. The fact is, the state of Israel wouldn't exist today without the support from Christian Zionists. What makes you a supporter? Even Ben Netanyahu doesn't think much of Christian Zionists.
One thing that happens at Scored is autofilters remove links that they don't like. When this happens everyone else sees "Comment removed by spam filter, pending further review." instead of your comment. You can find a log URL that will show the first line of the removed comment ["the origin of man is deliberately being covered up from us They are covering a lot more than you think about the original man. There are [two creation stories of humans in the Bible.](https://4."]. All you need to do is repost it without the link (and possibly tell people less directly how to find the link).
c/Conspiracies has no active moderators; admin names are on the list and they are active but very rarely step in here. So it's a Wild West forum right now. Don't sweat it.
You might be interested to know that basically no readers of Genesis had any problem with creation being told from two perspectives until 19th-century German higher critics came in and started writing theories about how the Bible was contradictory and recent and how nobody needed to believe in God or live morally. Little bit of pandering to their own deviances there. Quite an interesting rabbit hole. Those of us in the 21st century who are still troubled by Biblical accounts are not reading them in their cultural setting. But, as I said, I'm still interested in what the real Truth is as the two accounts have much to say about Reality that is unappreciated by Christianity (notice the movement of gold, for instance) and there is much around the text for us to learn from.
Thanks. The link that I provided was an image of a table showing the two creation stories side-by-side. Nothing special, here is another link showing exactly the same thing. Let's see if they censor this as well: https://i.pinimg.com/474x/7d/af/15/7daf15dd7d129189e4ef019c2fa295cf.jpg?nii=t
I don't have a problem with inconsistencies in the Bible, it's something I would expect. And anything can be explained to a brainwashed audience. I have an issue with what's not being there (i.e. included in the Bible), for instance 1Enoch, The Book of Jubilees, The Gospel of Thomas, Apocryphon of John, etc. Same jews were censoring then, as their descendants are doing today.
And the Gospel of Thomas is not even a gnostic text and according to many scholars it was written before the Synoptics.
He's the owner of c/Satanism c/Porno and c/Yahweh, he's playing both sides.
He is also associated with Scott Lively, another evangelical Christian Zionist. As far as I am concerned the Christian Zionists, along with the jews, are responsible for most of the evil and the problems in the world today. Without them there wouldn't be a Rothschild state of Israel in Middle East. https://www.scottlively.net/swamp-rangers/swamp-rangers-recruiting-office/
I disagree with you here. IMO, Christian Zionists are the most brainwashed people of Earth. But, they don't play anything... they just obey. They're puppets on a string. According to Bibi they're "useful idiots".
Good link, there are definitely intentionally different perspectives, but the chart also overextends its case such as giving the impression that "male" and "female" are plural when they aren't.
So we can talk c/FlatEarth (mine) or c/flatearthresearch (another guy's). I love apocryphal writings and they are allowed at c/Christianity (the original Christian forum, where I became the most active mod), but some might prefer c/Faith (mine) or c/ChristianAnarchism (nobody's). A friend just started c/HolySeekersOfTheWay and is open to apocrypha too, that's new so you can propose direction there if you like. There are more.
So I trust you accept James, since he's in Josephus? Note that when James says be a Doer of the Word, Hebrew for doer is Oseh, and I think the best etymological theory is that Osey became Essene. John and Jesus were a lot more Essene than people realize, because there were not just the cave Essenes, but a much broader supporter Essene network that lived in the towns but paid for the cave work to be done. The reason the Essenes vanished is twofold, the cave people couldn't keep up after life changed for everyone in 70, and the town people all became Christians and many of them dutifully headed for the hills in 68 following Jesus's prophecy. So they are a huge strand of the primitive church that (like others, including the Gentile) contributed to what the church was by the time of Polycarp and Irenaeus.
I want to ask you a question. But, first let me answer your question; No I don't trust anyone. They have given James the title "the just" for a reason. He may or may not be the brother of Jesus, but that's irrelevant to me.
And it's Titus Flavius Josephus, but his real name is Joseph ben Matityahu. And yes he's a jew who changed his name, like so many others. They do it today as well. And that brings me to the question.
I know you're a Christian Zionist and here is your website. To me Christian Zionists, especially the ones in America, along with the jews, are responsible for the creation of the state of Israel. Jacob Rothschild bragged that was his family who created Israel, and that may be true from a finance pov, but that's all. The fact is, the state of Israel wouldn't exist today without the support from Christian Zionists. What makes you a supporter? Even Ben Netanyahu doesn't think much of Christian Zionists.
And JG5 owns c/SynagogueofSatan, so him citing those is irrelevant.
Yes, I do. I expose them, not embrace them.