JosephGenesisDenier5 commits strawman
(media.scored.co)
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Hu aka hue implies "color"...black isn't a color but the absence thereof.
He's mad I destroyed his argument in another thread 😎
The word "black" has A and B in it. That implies that they are the best and also the second best. I can do word games too.
B-lack...lacking, hence the absence of color. It's not really hidden unless willingly ignored.
Like ABC aka abecedary aka abracadabra aka spell-craft? Few suggest the alphabet table as a primer so that many ignore that there can be only one primer (sound) for each secondary (instrument) within.
B-est aka to estimate, hence in the eye of the beholder aka the being choosing to hold onto aka the one who looks at the speck of sawdust in ones brother's eye and pays no attention to the plank in ones own eye.
Only God does so that anyone within can respond to being done by. Putting I (possession) before CAN (procession) reduces being (potential).
Can/cunnan - "to know"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/can
And not of humanity. Also they're brown, not fully black.
Best best best best. Analyze that.
No one is ignoring anything, except you ignoring the fact your word games are worthless and fake.
What are you saying He is doing?
Nope, your word games do not work in real life. They're your fanfiction. Inb4 "work blah blah implies blah blah. Fan fiction imples and means this and that thing."
So why did you call them blacks?
...only if one ignores hu/hue - "color".
Gibs me dats aka esteeming ever more value aka "I can't get no satisfaction...'cause I tried and I tried and I tried and I tried"
In short...greed.
a) God WAS doing before anyone within can suggest what it IS that he does.
b) Do; verb - "bring to pass by procedure" aka "to set, put, place"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/do
God implies the process which brings to pass (inception towards death) each potential (life) within.
How does nothing work in real life? Notice that you used it twice (nope; not); while ignoring Gods singularity...
Does a fan rip apart that which he's a fan of...or is it the holding onto in devotion, which shapes the fiction that destroys anything else within reality?
"A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" ~Winston Churchill
Which one can't change his mind...the one holding onto words (synthesis) or the one ripping words apart (analysis)? If one holds onto words, then ones choice subjects self to the chosen one who suggested words.
Thanks for bringing up energy (work)...being within energy implies a reduction of power given the potential to increase. That's why the potential to wield knowledge has to be grown during loss.
Fiction implies a synthesis aka putting stuff together...this and that thing implies a separation from one another aka analysis.
Woah, no rebuttal? WEAK
> literally no rebuttal
You don’t got shit on TS, don’t try to ape his style, chump
You are funny. What's your beef?
Dude, shut up. They specifically asked us to judge them by the content of their character. It's hardly our fault that they act like subhuman animals.
If a husky dog delivers me food, he is doing something beneficial, correct? Whites give the world many benefits, yes? Therefore, huskies are human. The husky does many good things for me. Its character content is good. That makes it human!!
Yeah, whatever Plato. Do you need me to pluck a chicken and throw it at you?
And, if we're being completely honest, what would you rather live next to? A husky or a ratchet-ass black?
Whichever choice I choose says absolutely nothing about humanness.
I would live to the latter if they demonstrated belief in and following Biblical Christianity. Otherwise, a hard no, and I'd pick the former.
How many demonstrate belief in and follow Biblical Christianity?
Just for the sake of argument, let's say 50%, though I suspect it's significantly less.
Do you need to flip a coin every time you interact with a black or do you just disregard the entirety? It's far safer to simply avoid them all.
At what point do you just accept that we're two different sub species that are incompatible?
Nope. You just ask and probe. Obviously be defending yourself at all times.
Everyone comes from Adam and Eve.
Like how White marxists are incompatible with White patriots, yeah.
Ask and probe for what? Do you honestly think you're missing out on something by not associating with blacks?
Everyone comes from Adam and Eve, but you're forgetting the thousands of years that these groups lived apart, developing separately and distinctly. To suggest that the average Ethiopian is the same as the average German is disingenuous at best.
Even if we're taking the Bible literally and Genesis was only 6000ish years ago, that's enough time for distinct racial features to evolve.
And I don't particularly give a fuck about what white people think about anything anymore.
Worldview.
Not necessarily.
I didn't say they were the same. To assume difference means "non human" implies Asians are more human than Whites are. (There is a chart where Asians commit less crime generally than Whites.)
evolveBe expressed. By that logic, a baby inheriting and expressing brown eyes evolved that feature. Even though it already existed. Predetermined genes, not naturalistic creation of new ones.
Ok. Good to know you're not high on hopium about that.
He strawmanned because I didn't say rejecting replacement was bad. You can reject replacement and know that they're human.
Sheeeiiittt!
Niggers are human because muh Genesis!
So you reject the Biblical historical account in pursuit of believing in stats gathered by man.
So you reject statistics.
I don't. By your logic huskies are human beings because they do less violence than blacks. That means HUSKIES ARE HUMAN!! But you reject the human-ness of husky dogs because apparently you reject stats!
TFW you'll end up on this list 😂