I don't wish to argue with you, Guy. This is a complicated issue where the Christian libertarian approach is not easily understood out of context. Why don't you state a positive proposition in a post in another forum and I may get around to it next year?
Add: Did you know that your every comment here newly informs people of the "block" function by virtue of the linked word "block" under your comment? Refocus.
No, Guy, in my second sentence, which was not a non sequitur, I cannot promise not to make people aware of the block function when my every comment makes people aware of the block function by platform programming. Nor am I interested in arguing over it or explaining my view, because unlike the things I do explain at length this is an inconsequential intramural question that you are free to be wrong about. You are being tenacious and my first sentence was intended to redirect you patiently to greener fields.
I don't wish to argue with you, Guy. This is a complicated issue where the Christian libertarian approach is not easily understood out of context. Why don't you state a positive proposition in a post in another forum and I may get around to it next year?
Because I don't want you announicing that bl**cking exists. Promise me you won't do that and I won't raise the issue.
Thank you so much for your moderation work at c/BewareTheirTactics.
Add: Did you know that your every comment here newly informs people of the "block" function by virtue of the linked word "block" under your comment? Refocus.
So do you promise or no? I notice you and Exit always tap dance around this issue. Your slippery tactics do not work here.
No, Guy, in my second sentence, which was not a non sequitur, I cannot promise not to make people aware of the block function when my every comment makes people aware of the block function by platform programming. Nor am I interested in arguing over it or explaining my view, because unlike the things I do explain at length this is an inconsequential intramural question that you are free to be wrong about. You are being tenacious and my first sentence was intended to redirect you patiently to greener fields.