Just 'cause these two are over the limit on the gaydar doesn't mean the Church is "fake and gay".
Correct - having fake and gay clergy doesn't necessary make the Church fake and gay. But in the case of the RCC, having the Pope affirm literal pro gay teachings like Fiducia supplicans (blessing of same sex couples) and not condemn priests acting this way makes the whole system fake and gay, because it hinges on his authority.
By that measurement, your post is fake and gay, so I must assume you are, too?
What part of my comment is fake and gay? The term is not "anything I disagree about", it has a specific connotation.
You'd be surprised at how subtly documents like Fiducia supplicans skirms heresy without falling into it. Hence preserving the Pope (and the Church) from overall fakeness and gayness ;)
What I've been trying to tell people.
All the same, it was literally produced by the Spanish Inquisition (now called the DDF), and Hippie Frank (whom I took to calling "Mario the Slummer") expressed cautious hope that things like this would improve the Inquisition's overall optics. So the awareness of others' perception is still behind the times. Vigano all the way, for me.
Correct - having fake and gay clergy doesn't necessary make the Church fake and gay. But in the case of the RCC, having the Pope affirm literal pro gay teachings like Fiducia supplicans (blessing of same sex couples) and not condemn priests acting this way makes the whole system fake and gay, because it hinges on his authority.
What part of my comment is fake and gay? The term is not "anything I disagree about", it has a specific connotation.
What I've been trying to tell people.
All the same, it was literally produced by the Spanish Inquisition (now called the DDF), and Hippie Frank (whom I took to calling "Mario the Slummer") expressed cautious hope that things like this would improve the Inquisition's overall optics. So the awareness of others' perception is still behind the times. Vigano all the way, for me.