b) Joining together put things AT ODDS with one another, while ignoring even.
implication is a non-factor.
a) Everything implies each thing...nothing denies everything and thereby implication (if/then).
b) Notice that factor has ACT (action) in it, which implies reaction in reality. Putting an F before ACT implies fictitious action aka a fiction shaped by reaction within action as distraction for one another.
A suggested fact tempts one to hold onto, thereby contradicting action, which cannot be held onto.
c) The use of "is" implies a circular conflict (is vs isn't), which implication (if/then) doesn't have.
b) Right forwards (inception towards death), which admits being (life)... I AM implies a being taking possession over self while ignoring the righteous process.
being right implies
If right; then being. If being; then within the righteous way.
No it doesn't.
Aka "nothing it does nothing"...that's you being tricked by a theorem of propositional logic called "double negation".
Nature shows no such thing (separation).
a) So there's no difference between a beings perception and what nature offers it? If I fart over here, then can you smell it over there or could there be a natural separation of position among being?
b) If you say "thing", then that implies a separation of each thing from one another within everything.
c) Isn't there a separation between show and audience?
d) Aren't yes and no separated from one another?
e) Such implies "alike" one another...so doesn't one have to be separated from one another to judge such and such likeness of one another?
"mother and off spring"...Irrelevant.
Relevance implies relieve, hence the relief a mother feels after the separation of each off-spring. Nature giving each being free will of choice implies a relief of burden; it's choosing to hold onto which reestablishes burden....branding anything "irrelevant" implies the sharing attempt of a self imposed burden aka a sin-tax (syntax).
tangential
Tangent implies "meeting at a point without intersecting"...being implies life sentence moved towards point of death by separation from one another, which allows intersection aka internal sex. Therefore...to be implies divergence. Few suggest tangent to entangle many together.
Absolute implies "free from limitations"...Only in certain contexts.
a) Only implies one and only...not only and "certain contexts".
b) Certain implies the use of ones free will of choice to ascertain aka to suggest an assurance to one another to tempt consent into a binding contract.
In short...certainty tempts free will of choice into bondage.
c) Context implies "to weave together" aka the aforementioned bondage of free will of choice into a binding contract with one another called "consensus".
d) Free implies from balance....balance implies the action limiting reacting choice. Only within balance can there be choice.
Limitations such as...?
Balance. Choice implies in-between balance. Imbalance implies choice within balance choosing to hold onto one side, which establishes the circular conflict against the other side aka imbalance for choice.
info
Aka suggested information tempting one to ignore perceivable inspiration.
proving my claim
a) Proof/prove is in the pudding/putting...nature puts (inception) and pulls (death) being (life) in (living) and out (dying) of existence.
b) Claiming implies making a demand, which contradicts the given mandate of heaven from genesis (inception towards death) to revelation (life).
Who is going to know this?
Each one who discerns self within knowledge..which cannot be shared without contradicting SELF discernment.
Who actually believes this?
Knowledge moves through one; beliefs tempt one to hold onto. Believing contradicts knowing.
What buildings are going to be constructed by this?
Knowledge doesn't con (together) struct (structure)...it allows ones self dis (to divide) cern (to perceive) ment (mind).
Building implies division, hence the fruit of ones labors aka each off-spring. Few suggest construction by utilizing free-masonry and mosaic law to tempt many into building artificial constructs/creations/fashions/manufactures/compositions/produce/engineering/developments etc. Holding onto a construct implies idolatry...hence constructing the tower of babel until it collapses upon its foundation yet again.
"The conflict between real vs false only exist within a circle...not within the straight line." You made that up. That's false.
a) Free-will-of-choice sets apart what a jew made up, and what gentiles hold together. Why? Because resisting the temptation to hold together what another made up...sustains free will of choice.
b) Versus/verto - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/versus Turning implies circular rotation; being (life) implies linear progression (inception towards death).
c) Drawing a circle implies putting the beginning and end of a line together, which inverts nature setting beginning (inception) and end (death) of line apart (life), hence establishing ones life-line.
d) Up and down aren't in a circular conflict against one another, but represent balance (up/down) for ones choice in-between, and only within linear motion can there be balance (momentum) for choice (matter).
"a circle TURNS on itself"...that's false.
How to draw a circle without beginning turning onto end?
stop confusing matter as in physical matter with matter as in relevancy.
a) Only within motion (inception towards death) can there be matter (life)...other suggest the cessation of motion (stop) to tempt one to deny being moved.
b) Only within ALL can there be physic-AL and ment-AL relevancy aka separation from one another, which con (together) fuse (to melt) contradicts.
What's being speculated about?
Being implies special aka specific (partial) within all (whole)...speculation (conjecture of thinking) with one another tempts one to ignore that, which permits each jew to establish "investment of money upon risk for the sake of profit" among speculative gentiles aka investment banking within the vestige of gentile minds.
What's a vestige? A mark, trace, sign aka an idol of speculation.
How competent you are?
Competence tempts one to compete against one another, while ignoring that all (perceivable) is given to each one (perception) for free will of choice.
b) Joining together put things AT ODDS with one another, while
Contradictory. Joining implies union. I'm not obsessed with words yet I know this. Another L for your word games.
ignoring even.
And why is that a bad thing? "Ignoring even" isn't a coherent phrase. Thanks for admitting you don't know how to use english right. Your "mental exercise" has FAILED. So stop it.
b) Notice that factor has ACT (action) in it, which implies reaction in reality. Putting an F before ACT implies fictitious action aka a fiction shaped by reaction within action as distraction for one another.
"F" comes before "ree will of choice", implying absolutely every single thing you do, say, and believe is fictitious.
a) Union implies one (uni) action (ion), which separates into each unit of reaction within. Only reactions set apart from one another can choose to join together.
b) Join/joie - "pleasure; delight; bliss", hence to rejoice - "to own, possess, enjoy the possession of"...joining implies falling for temptation, hence getting owned; getting possessed and repossessed by others.
Prime example for joining...sex (seco; to divide). The more one falls for the temptation of lust when joining together, the more one fucks up the sexual divide producing off-spring aka the fruit of ones labors aka the coming into being of another UNIT.
c) God implies singularity...joining together implies plurality.
d) A jew tempts gentiles together by suggesting united states; united nations; united kingdom; soviet union; european union; university; uniformity; universalism; unicode; unicef; universal serial bus; unisex; universal pictures; universal basic income; unilever etc...joining either destroys each unit of being.
"ignoring even"...And why is that a bad thing?
Because it puts good vs bad against one another aka at odds...
"Ignoring even" isn't a coherent phrase
a) Even implies "level/balance"...being implies choice. Cohere aka com (together) haerere (to adhere, stick) implies ones free will of choice stuck in bondage to another.
b) Phrase/phrasis - "way of speech" implies sound as the way within speech can be articulated. Doing so tempts one to ignore natural (sound) for artificial (speech) aka falling for spell-craft...entrance free-will-of-choice analyzing and disassembling crafted spells.
Another L for your word games.
L implies "loser" aka a game in-between wining vs losing...
how to use english right.
Right implies linear; english implies angular...hence the freemasonic use of square (angular english) and compass (circular logic).
stop it
Each being is on a journey (ones path of life)...few suggest "don't stop believing" to tempt many into stopping non-believers, which mutually destroys each others journey.
...that's what comes before free will of choice. Also...F implies a letter aka one within all letting another shape letters into words to attach meaning.
a) Union implies one (uni) action (ion), which separates into
What's getting seperated? Your sense of reality into lots of pieces?
Yes, joining implies union.
unit of reaction
Incoherent phrase.
Only reactions set apart from one another can choose to join together.
Reaction aren't sentient, no.
join/joie - "pleasure; delight; bliss", hence to rejoice - "to own, possess, enjoy the possession of"...joining implies falling for temptation, hence getting owned; getting possessed and repossessed by others.
"OH WOW LOOKY WORDS LOOK SIMILAR THAT MEANS THEYRE RELATED!!!!!!" No.
Prime example for joining...s** (seco; to divide). The more one falls for the temptation of lvst when joining together, the more one up the divide producing off-spring aka the fruit of ones labors aka the coming into being of another UNIT.
(Mad screed)
God implies singularity...joining together implies plurality.
Irrelevant.
Because it puts good vs bad against one another aka at odds...
Nature puts them at odds, naturally.
Phrase/phrasis - "way of speech" implies sound as the way within speech can be articulated.
You sure LOOOVEE this "sound" that speech is "within".
Doing so tempts one to ignore natural (sound) for artificial (speech)
No.
entrance free-will-of-choice analyzing and disassembling crafted spells.
Whilst making your own, implying contradiction... and you TURN ON YOURSELF, implying destruction of your worldview.
L implies "loser" aka a game in-between wining vs losing...
Yes, your word games took the L.
Right implies linear; english implies angular...hence the freemasonic use of square (angular english) and compass (circular logic).
Effect within cause; partial within whole; reaction within action; growth within loss; potential within energy; choice within balance; matter within motion; temporal within ongoing...Christ within God.
Your sense of reality into lots of pieces?
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) aka each one sensing all as a piece within...few cast "lots" to draw many together into a fiction.
Yes, joining implies union.
If so, then why do yes and no fight for separation from each other?
"unit of reaction"...Incoherent phrase.
Unit implies singular...coherence and phrase imply plural. Seeking the latter within the former implies a contradiction within the mind of the singular being seeking.
Reaction aren't sentient
Action signifies reaction, hence enabling sentience by sending input to react to aka all perceivable giving each ones perception sentience.
WORDS LOOK SIMILAR THAT MEANS THEYRE RELATED
Different words can only be shaped within same sound...consenting to the meaning of a suggested word draws a relation aka binding ones choice to a chosen one, and singular consent into plural consensus.
To look/lock implies holding onto aka affixing ones sight, hence few utilizing a screen to project suggestions towards onlookers.
s**...lvst...one up
Nature doesn't censor...it reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception). As for the Christian perspective: "Judge not lest ye be judged" ~Matthew 7:1
"God implies singularity...joining together implies plurality."...Irrelevant.
Relevance aka a recognizable connection can only be shaped by joining singles together. Nature separates each being from one another...few trick many together with a game of "connect the dots". A dot implies a point aka "end of sentence"...being implies send towards point of death, while being given sentience.
Nature puts them at odds, naturally.
Nature implies singularity; each being a single unit within. Nature evens (inception towards death) odds (life)...few artificially tempt many at odds against one another, while using nature to even them out.
You sure LOOOVEE this "sound" that speech is "within".
Love implies versus hate...that's noise among instruments, while ignoring that sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" implies silence.
All cannot be in conflict...only each one within can choose to love or hate one another, hence responding to sound implying resonance, while fighting each other implies dissonance.
Notice that taking anything loved into possession turns into hate the longer one holds onto...try it with a beloved cat to learn that lesson really quick.
"Doing so tempts one to ignore natural (sound) for artificial (speech)"...No
Ig-NO-rance...
Whilst making your own
Free-will-of-choice cannot own without contradicting self...any spells broken apart remain open for further analysis, because words are formed within flowing sound.
you TURN ON YOURSELF
For oneself to overcome the internal conflict against YOU (judah) requires one to let go of I AM (jesus).
In other words...claiming self as "me; myself or I" turns into artificial conflict, since natures process cannot be possessed by any potential within.
your word games took the L
Free-will-of-choice only analyzed the game (win vs lose) implied within the "L" another suggested...where's the side taking?
By your logic you're a mason.
a) Logos>logic>reason contradicts implication (if/then)
b) Mason implies amassing (ma) sound (son)...being implies instrument set apart from one another within sound, hence being freed from one another.
Few amass many together by tempting FREE into MA while ignoring SON.
From the Christian perspective...Christ (anointed one) the Son (sound). Amassing things together causes friction, while anointment prevents friction by separation of partials. If God implies engine, then each part within requires anointment to prevent friction.
you believe songs actually make authoritative claims about reality.
a) Only within sound can one sing a song...MTV (masonic tell-a-vision) shapes the sing song to distract the audience from sound, yet just like with spell-craft...the natural moves through the artificial, while those who ignore natural are holding onto artificial.
b) Notice 2.3 billion Christians worldwide and 425 million views of that one song "don't stop believing"...that's how the anti-christ gospel is being spread.
2025 years to reach 2.3 billion vs 425 million since its 2010 upload...and don't even think about the 16 billion views of Baby Shark aka to poke/stir (shark) babylon (baby) towards "it's the end".
c) Author/aug - "to increase"...only during decrease (inception towards death) can there be increase (life), hence being given authorization.
The letter...does
How does one LET? By free will of choice...
WHAT YOU believe.
BELIEVE implies taking into possession; BEING ALIVE implies given potential.
DIDN'T aka DID NOTHING...once again a fiction applied to real life.
a) https://www.etymonline.com/word/apply
b) Joining together put things AT ODDS with one another, while ignoring even.
a) Everything implies each thing...nothing denies everything and thereby implication (if/then).
b) Notice that factor has ACT (action) in it, which implies reaction in reality. Putting an F before ACT implies fictitious action aka a fiction shaped by reaction within action as distraction for one another.
A suggested fact tempts one to hold onto, thereby contradicting action, which cannot be held onto.
c) The use of "is" implies a circular conflict (is vs isn't), which implication (if/then) doesn't have.
a) Right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right
b) Right forwards (inception towards death), which admits being (life)... I AM implies a being taking possession over self while ignoring the righteous process.
If right; then being. If being; then within the righteous way.
Aka "nothing it does nothing"...that's you being tricked by a theorem of propositional logic called "double negation".
a) So there's no difference between a beings perception and what nature offers it? If I fart over here, then can you smell it over there or could there be a natural separation of position among being?
b) If you say "thing", then that implies a separation of each thing from one another within everything.
c) Isn't there a separation between show and audience?
d) Aren't yes and no separated from one another?
e) Such implies "alike" one another...so doesn't one have to be separated from one another to judge such and such likeness of one another?
Relevance implies relieve, hence the relief a mother feels after the separation of each off-spring. Nature giving each being free will of choice implies a relief of burden; it's choosing to hold onto which reestablishes burden....branding anything "irrelevant" implies the sharing attempt of a self imposed burden aka a sin-tax (syntax).
Tangent implies "meeting at a point without intersecting"...being implies life sentence moved towards point of death by separation from one another, which allows intersection aka internal sex. Therefore...to be implies divergence. Few suggest tangent to entangle many together.
a) Only implies one and only...not only and "certain contexts".
b) Certain implies the use of ones free will of choice to ascertain aka to suggest an assurance to one another to tempt consent into a binding contract.
In short...certainty tempts free will of choice into bondage.
c) Context implies "to weave together" aka the aforementioned bondage of free will of choice into a binding contract with one another called "consensus".
d) Free implies from balance....balance implies the action limiting reacting choice. Only within balance can there be choice.
Balance. Choice implies in-between balance. Imbalance implies choice within balance choosing to hold onto one side, which establishes the circular conflict against the other side aka imbalance for choice.
Aka suggested information tempting one to ignore perceivable inspiration.
a) Proof/prove is in the pudding/putting...nature puts (inception) and pulls (death) being (life) in (living) and out (dying) of existence.
Prove aka pro-bhwo implies "forwarded being"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prove
b) Claiming implies making a demand, which contradicts the given mandate of heaven from genesis (inception towards death) to revelation (life).
Each one who discerns self within knowledge..which cannot be shared without contradicting SELF discernment.
Knowledge moves through one; beliefs tempt one to hold onto. Believing contradicts knowing.
Knowledge doesn't con (together) struct (structure)...it allows ones self dis (to divide) cern (to perceive) ment (mind).
Building implies division, hence the fruit of ones labors aka each off-spring. Few suggest construction by utilizing free-masonry and mosaic law to tempt many into building artificial constructs/creations/fashions/manufactures/compositions/produce/engineering/developments etc. Holding onto a construct implies idolatry...hence constructing the tower of babel until it collapses upon its foundation yet again.
a) Free-will-of-choice sets apart what a jew made up, and what gentiles hold together. Why? Because resisting the temptation to hold together what another made up...sustains free will of choice.
b) Versus/verto - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/versus Turning implies circular rotation; being (life) implies linear progression (inception towards death).
c) Drawing a circle implies putting the beginning and end of a line together, which inverts nature setting beginning (inception) and end (death) of line apart (life), hence establishing ones life-line.
d) Up and down aren't in a circular conflict against one another, but represent balance (up/down) for ones choice in-between, and only within linear motion can there be balance (momentum) for choice (matter).
How to draw a circle without beginning turning onto end?
a) Only within motion (inception towards death) can there be matter (life)...other suggest the cessation of motion (stop) to tempt one to deny being moved.
b) Only within ALL can there be physic-AL and ment-AL relevancy aka separation from one another, which con (together) fuse (to melt) contradicts.
Being implies special aka specific (partial) within all (whole)...speculation (conjecture of thinking) with one another tempts one to ignore that, which permits each jew to establish "investment of money upon risk for the sake of profit" among speculative gentiles aka investment banking within the vestige of gentile minds.
What's a vestige? A mark, trace, sign aka an idol of speculation.
Competence tempts one to compete against one another, while ignoring that all (perceivable) is given to each one (perception) for free will of choice.
Your etymology games are DEFINITELY a FICTION applied to real life.
https://AnswersinGenesis.org
Contradictory. Joining implies union. I'm not obsessed with words yet I know this. Another L for your word games.
And why is that a bad thing? "Ignoring even" isn't a coherent phrase. Thanks for admitting you don't know how to use english right. Your "mental exercise" has FAILED. So stop it.
"F" comes before "ree will of choice", implying absolutely every single thing you do, say, and believe is fictitious.
a) Union implies one (uni) action (ion), which separates into each unit of reaction within. Only reactions set apart from one another can choose to join together.
b) Join/joie - "pleasure; delight; bliss", hence to rejoice - "to own, possess, enjoy the possession of"...joining implies falling for temptation, hence getting owned; getting possessed and repossessed by others.
Prime example for joining...sex (seco; to divide). The more one falls for the temptation of lust when joining together, the more one fucks up the sexual divide producing off-spring aka the fruit of ones labors aka the coming into being of another UNIT.
c) God implies singularity...joining together implies plurality.
d) A jew tempts gentiles together by suggesting united states; united nations; united kingdom; soviet union; european union; university; uniformity; universalism; unicode; unicef; universal serial bus; unisex; universal pictures; universal basic income; unilever etc...joining either destroys each unit of being.
Because it puts good vs bad against one another aka at odds...
a) Even implies "level/balance"...being implies choice. Cohere aka com (together) haerere (to adhere, stick) implies ones free will of choice stuck in bondage to another.
b) Phrase/phrasis - "way of speech" implies sound as the way within speech can be articulated. Doing so tempts one to ignore natural (sound) for artificial (speech) aka falling for spell-craft...entrance free-will-of-choice analyzing and disassembling crafted spells.
L implies "loser" aka a game in-between wining vs losing...
Right implies linear; english implies angular...hence the freemasonic use of square (angular english) and compass (circular logic).
Each being is on a journey (ones path of life)...few suggest "don't stop believing" to tempt many into stopping non-believers, which mutually destroys each others journey.
https://genius.com/Journey-dont-stop-believin-lyrics
...that's what comes before free will of choice. Also...F implies a letter aka one within all letting another shape letters into words to attach meaning.
...
What's getting seperated? Your sense of reality into lots of pieces?
Yes, joining implies union.
Incoherent phrase.
Reaction aren't sentient, no.
"OH WOW LOOKY WORDS LOOK SIMILAR THAT MEANS THEYRE RELATED!!!!!!" No.
(Mad screed)
Irrelevant.
Nature puts them at odds, naturally.
You sure LOOOVEE this "sound" that speech is "within".
No.
Whilst making your own, implying contradiction... and you TURN ON YOURSELF, implying destruction of your worldview.
Yes, your word games took the L.
By your logic you're a mason.
What's your journey?
No.
Wow, you believe songs actually make authoritative claims about reality.
"FreeWillofChoice is WRONG! FreeWillofChoice is WRONG! Whyyy, oh Whyy, would you believe his Gaaames? Why, Why, Why Why Why!" repeats chant 5 times
The letter F does, yeah.
WHAT YOU believe.
That's what's ficticious. Stop using your obsession with word games to misread what people say.
Effect within cause; partial within whole; reaction within action; growth within loss; potential within energy; choice within balance; matter within motion; temporal within ongoing...Christ within God.
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) aka each one sensing all as a piece within...few cast "lots" to draw many together into a fiction.
If so, then why do yes and no fight for separation from each other?
Unit implies singular...coherence and phrase imply plural. Seeking the latter within the former implies a contradiction within the mind of the singular being seeking.
Action signifies reaction, hence enabling sentience by sending input to react to aka all perceivable giving each ones perception sentience.
Different words can only be shaped within same sound...consenting to the meaning of a suggested word draws a relation aka binding ones choice to a chosen one, and singular consent into plural consensus.
To look/lock implies holding onto aka affixing ones sight, hence few utilizing a screen to project suggestions towards onlookers.
Nature doesn't censor...it reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception). As for the Christian perspective: "Judge not lest ye be judged" ~Matthew 7:1
Relevance aka a recognizable connection can only be shaped by joining singles together. Nature separates each being from one another...few trick many together with a game of "connect the dots". A dot implies a point aka "end of sentence"...being implies send towards point of death, while being given sentience.
Nature implies singularity; each being a single unit within. Nature evens (inception towards death) odds (life)...few artificially tempt many at odds against one another, while using nature to even them out.
Nature implies even/level/balance...being implies odd/different/choice.
Love implies versus hate...that's noise among instruments, while ignoring that sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" implies silence.
All cannot be in conflict...only each one within can choose to love or hate one another, hence responding to sound implying resonance, while fighting each other implies dissonance.
Notice that taking anything loved into possession turns into hate the longer one holds onto...try it with a beloved cat to learn that lesson really quick.
Ig-NO-rance...
Free-will-of-choice cannot own without contradicting self...any spells broken apart remain open for further analysis, because words are formed within flowing sound.
For oneself to overcome the internal conflict against YOU (judah) requires one to let go of I AM (jesus).
In other words...claiming self as "me; myself or I" turns into artificial conflict, since natures process cannot be possessed by any potential within.
Free-will-of-choice only analyzed the game (win vs lose) implied within the "L" another suggested...where's the side taking?
a) Logos>logic>reason contradicts implication (if/then)
b) Mason implies amassing (ma) sound (son)...being implies instrument set apart from one another within sound, hence being freed from one another.
Few amass many together by tempting FREE into MA while ignoring SON.
From the Christian perspective...Christ (anointed one) the Son (sound). Amassing things together causes friction, while anointment prevents friction by separation of partials. If God implies engine, then each part within requires anointment to prevent friction.
a) Only within sound can one sing a song...MTV (masonic tell-a-vision) shapes the sing song to distract the audience from sound, yet just like with spell-craft...the natural moves through the artificial, while those who ignore natural are holding onto artificial.
b) Notice 2.3 billion Christians worldwide and 425 million views of that one song "don't stop believing"...that's how the anti-christ gospel is being spread.
2025 years to reach 2.3 billion vs 425 million since its 2010 upload...and don't even think about the 16 billion views of Baby Shark aka to poke/stir (shark) babylon (baby) towards "it's the end".
c) Author/aug - "to increase"...only during decrease (inception towards death) can there be increase (life), hence being given authorization.
How does one LET? By free will of choice...
BELIEVE implies taking into possession; BEING ALIVE implies given potential.