That's being antisemitic
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Andrew Wilson is now on a campaign to classify Candace as a crazy, well poisoner. Everything Candice says is crazy and TPUsa is just a band of loving brothers defending their fallen brother. Right. I love situations like this because it allows the Israelites to identify themselves. Nick Fuentes on the payroll? Check. Andrew Wilson on the payroll? Check.
Andrew is not a fan of Israel. He literally debates zionists. Nick is a RC and his Church supports Israel and condemns antisemitism so I agree about him. Wait, so is Candace... The cognitive dissonance with those guys must be insane, or maybe they're just facelords playing their part.
This is EXACTLY how the Israel job works. Nick was against Israel until the day people said Israel was involved in Kirks assassination. Then Nick was the mouth piece for "THATS IMPOSSIBLE!" Andrew has been activated to attack Candace. I have been listening to Andrew daily for the past year. He is always precise with his attacks. He is calling Candace "crazy with her crazy conspiracy theories". This is exactly the language The View uses to attack people vocal against public gaslighting. Exactly same strategy. It is a complete 180 degree turn on how he has handled himself on other topics. He's also showing up now on mainstream. He may have not started as an asset but he sure is fuck now.
So if I call someone crazy for believing something I'm automatically an Israel shill and The View kind of guy? I haven't heard what Andrew's take is and how he argumented himself but people can disagree and go after one another without being paid shills. I agree with Candace's take on Bridgette Macron but I wouldn't call anyone who called her crazy then an asset doing damage control.
Then you don't understand Andrew is all. This is very out of character for him. He doesn't talk about a subject without being extremely informed. There is nothing about the Kirk assassination that makes sense from TPUsa or the FBI if you've followed all the details. He also tends to only attack people by providing logical inconsistencies in their own arguments. He wasn't addressing any of Candace's claims (which are really mostly details unveiled by others) in detail.