Rejecting history (the Bible) because Richard Dawkins yelled emotionally at God in his fallacious book is like burning down your house because you found a spider in the attic. It's a race to the primitive and empty and bad, and exactly what we're trying to avoid because it ends with practicing wickedness and deviancy, and eating cats like a 3rd worlder.
For some of the names and places, but there is no proof of anything supernatural. No evidence that the Jewish people were ever in bondage in Egypt. No evidence that Joshua blew a trumpet and crumbled walls, No credible evidence of a global flood. etc....
I can give you a rundown on Kathleen Kenyon's Jericho dig and the 4.2kya event too if you like, but your comment strikes me as somehow antiscientific. Maybe (with your username) you need to start out letting us know your presuppositions, or perhaps contribute to c/satanism.
Rejecting history (the Bible) because Richard Dawkins yelled emotionally at God in his fallacious book is like burning down your house because you found a spider in the attic. It's a race to the primitive and empty and bad, and exactly what we're trying to avoid because it ends with practicing wickedness and deviancy, and eating cats like a 3rd worlder.
The Bible is not history
Archeology wrecks your claim.
For some of the names and places, but there is no proof of anything supernatural. No evidence that the Jewish people were ever in bondage in Egypt. No evidence that Joshua blew a trumpet and crumbled walls, No credible evidence of a global flood. etc....
https://communities.win/c/Christianity/p/15HbbQEgDL/special-study-1718-apr-2022-phar/c
I can give you a rundown on Kathleen Kenyon's Jericho dig and the 4.2kya event too if you like, but your comment strikes me as somehow antiscientific. Maybe (with your username) you need to start out letting us know your presuppositions, or perhaps contribute to c/satanism.