They're encouraging Islam and arab immigration as fabian socialist have always done. The government itself is malthusian so it's antinatalist. This is basic stuff but you're not interested in reality.
It's simple - islamisation takes precedence. Their anti-natalist agenda is already doing great given that all civilized countries are below replacment.
Have you noticed how every time "democracy" is exported to a third world country, it inevitably leads to a drop in population growth? Same thing will eventually happen to muslims imported to first world countries. UK won't become an Islamic state and the muslims there won't become englishmen. It's a dialectic that will bring about a synthesis - the new world citizen, who in Count Coudenhove-Kalergi's words will be neither white, nor black but a mongrel race.
Yeah right, the guy who was instrumental in the creation of the EU was just writing fiction. Next you're going to say the same about Aldous Huxley I bet. They totally weren't part of elite circles that influenced policy. Isn't it curious how those guys predictions of 100+ years have been fulfilled? Such a coincidence.
Population growth stops because kids live long enough to not need replacements in case of childhood death.
No, I was speaking about the idea of replacing one retarded cult with another. Why is the only "answer to Islam" empowering Christianity? I don't want the breeding cult or the terrorists. Both can fuck off to the desert.
the retard in you
Christianity will only grow if something more malevolent or controlling than it is rises up. Otherwise, it will continue to decline over time as it has been.
They would absolutely love a rise of Islam, because it would result in people aligning with Christianity against it.
They're encouraging Islam and arab immigration as fabian socialist have always done. The government itself is malthusian so it's antinatalist. This is basic stuff but you're not interested in reality.
It's simple - islamisation takes precedence. Their anti-natalist agenda is already doing great given that all civilized countries are below replacment.
That makes no sense. Islam is natalist. If they were anti-natalist, they'd want to avoid Islamization at all costs.
Have you noticed how every time "democracy" is exported to a third world country, it inevitably leads to a drop in population growth? Same thing will eventually happen to muslims imported to first world countries. UK won't become an Islamic state and the muslims there won't become englishmen. It's a dialectic that will bring about a synthesis - the new world citizen, who in Count Coudenhove-Kalergi's words will be neither white, nor black but a mongrel race.
Kalergi was a sci-fi writer. What he says is irrelevant.
Islam never changes. Population growth stops because kids live long enough to not need replacements in case of childhood death.
Yeah right, the guy who was instrumental in the creation of the EU was just writing fiction. Next you're going to say the same about Aldous Huxley I bet. They totally weren't part of elite circles that influenced policy. Isn't it curious how those guys predictions of 100+ years have been fulfilled? Such a coincidence.
Did that make sense to you when you wrote it?
lol
Still a lower population than Christcucks.
It'd be easy to get rid of them if it wasn't tied to other, far more unpopular policy.
The cynic in me wonders if Christians want Islam to prevail because it will grow their numbers as a counter insurgency.
Why are you saying this as though it’s relevant to the topic?
Jew worship, yeah.
That’s the retard in you.
No, I was speaking about the idea of replacing one retarded cult with another. Why is the only "answer to Islam" empowering Christianity? I don't want the breeding cult or the terrorists. Both can fuck off to the desert.
Christianity will only grow if something more malevolent or controlling than it is rises up. Otherwise, it will continue to decline over time as it has been.
They would absolutely love a rise of Islam, because it would result in people aligning with Christianity against it.
Yeah, the unpopular policy of worshipping jews. That’s what you were saying.
Because only Christianity has ever fought them, probably.
I don’t want jews. Ever think about getting rid of jews?
No, I was talking about the actually provably unpopular policy of allowing Christianity to gain power.
False dichotomy. Religion is a waste of space.
No, but I have thought about how good it would be to get rid of stormfaggots, extremely painfully and on live TV.
Post public opinion polls.
Nope, a single data point. You don’t know what that term means.
tips yarmulke
Maybe you should, seeing as they’re responsible for everything you claim is wrong with the world.
Oh, so you’re a jew, got it.