Did I address any point of your OP? I'm addressing your comments on meta stuff.
Things are going great in the manner that your Church can't play tyrant over people anymore. Better to have issues and strife and personal religious freedom than live in luxury and be slaves of your cult.
Translation: I'd rather have illuminists talmudic child fuckers who push marxism, feminism and skittles and want to depop, poison and enslave everyone under an one world technocratic government than a Christian monarchy built around Christian values where usury and debt slavery is forbidden, 30% of women are not social media prostitutes and people who believe there are more than two sexes or that pee-pees going into poo-poos is love go to the madhouse (or rather to a monastery to get healed).
Yes I would rather people have personal freedom like the freedom of religion and speech, and people be able to do what they want as long as they aren't violating the rights of others.
Oh, you're libertarian, cool. Why should people care about NAP? What's wrong with violating the rights of others, given that rights themselves don't exist ontologically but are made up social constructs that are subject to change? Is this like your personal preference or is it objectively true that rights should be respected?
You still haven't answered the elephant in the room. Would you kill me in the name of your God if you could legally get away with it?
Wtf does that mean? I wont kill you without good reason of course.
Did I address any point of your OP? I'm addressing your comments on meta stuff.
Translation: I'd rather have illuminists talmudic child fuckers who push marxism, feminism and skittles and want to depop, poison and enslave everyone under an one world technocratic government than a Christian monarchy built around Christian values where usury and debt slavery is forbidden, 30% of women are not social media prostitutes and people who believe there are more than two sexes or that pee-pees going into poo-poos is love go to the madhouse (or rather to a monastery to get healed).
Yes. I know that.
Oh, you're libertarian, cool. Why should people care about NAP? What's wrong with violating the rights of others, given that rights themselves don't exist ontologically but are made up social constructs that are subject to change? Is this like your personal preference or is it objectively true that rights should be respected?
Wtf does that mean? I wont kill you without good reason of course.