Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

18
FDR Changed the dollar bill to include the Star of Remphan (media.scored.co)
posted 6 days ago by JosephGoebbel5 6 days ago by JosephGoebbel5 +22 / -4
28 comments share
28 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points 5 days ago +2 / -0

That's CBDC which is the continuation of the current central banking fiat system.

Doesn't disprove my point.

BTC is not CBDC. Is that a hard concept?

Didn't say otherwise. And it CAN be, if the DS/TPTB tries.

Something being digital doesn't make it inherently bad.

Correct. Digital is good, because we can destroy and disprove your belief that "phantom 0s and 1s are so great!" using digital things. CURRENCY, however, being digital, means it can be EMPed.

Also, how do you think cash was used and recieved before 1900??

Just up and admit that physical is superior.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 5 days ago +1 / -0

Didn't say otherwise. And it CAN be, if the DS/TPTB tries.

Then it will stop being BTC.

Correct. Digital is good, because we can destroy and disprove your belief that "phantom 0s and 1s are so great!" using digital things. CURRENCY, however, being digital, means it can be EMPed.

One would have a much harder time corrupting the BTC blockchain that's made of 0's and 1's than corrupting the physical logs of any central bank. As I already said, EMPs and shutdowns affect only the physical server. But BTC doesn't operate on a centralized infrastructure. The network has thousands of nodes all over the world and any peer can download the blockchain and create such a node. The blockchain itself is a 600gb long hash that exists separate from the internet.

If you mean EMPs nuking the whole internet and electrical system, then no currency would matter at all. How much gold did you see being traded in The Walking Dead? That's what the world will look like if the electrical grid is destroyed.

Just up and admit that physical is superior.

We're not living in the same world as 100 years ago. In our world things are digital. If physical is superior, wtf are you doing here on an online forum instead of the park or in a bar somewhere discussing this? Digital currency can solve many problems that physical currency has had throughout history. This is the idea behind BTC. Did you know banks were created solely because gold was dangerous to transport long distance? In a BTC-centered system there would no longer be any need of banks.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point 5 days ago +1 / -0

Then it will stop being BTC.

What do you mean? It will be name-changed to "TyrantCoin"? It will be deleted from existence? No, it still will be. Just controlled.

One would have a much harder time corrupting the BTC blockchain that's made of 0's and 1's than corrupting the physical logs of any central bank.

And once their tech-based logs are removed, then they become 100% impenetrable to digital.

any peer can download the blockchain

So what about people who had all their devices snatched by the UK and EU for hate speech? Good luck with that!

If you mean EMPs nuking the whole internet and electrical system, then no currency would matter at all.

Human history proves the opposite.

How much gold did you see being traded in The Walking Dead? That's what the world will look like if the electrical grid is destroyed.

And I don't see anyone walking around with a 666 chip on their hand or forehead. In TWD, you can create new nations with freedom and convert souls to Jesus without fear of AC assasinating you with fancy tech. Only about stupid savage zombies with no superpowers.

We're not living in the same world as 100 years ago.

Bill gates also thinks that's why you should trust vaxxines. If you don't that must mean you're a Luddite anti science dummy bigot who hates progress and improvement and The New.

In our world things are digital. If physical is superior, wtf are you doing here on an online forum instead of the park or in a bar somewhere discussing this?

Physical currency. Digital is good for destroying silly pro-digimoney arguments over vast distances in many countries, but sucky as a literal societal backbone. WALL-E taught you nothing.

Digital currency can solve many problems that physical currency has had throughout history.

And create worse and unfixable (by humans) ones. How do you think anti Christ will set up his system?

Did you know banks were created solely because gold was dangerous to transport long distance?

0.00000001% as dangerous and 100% less usable for control than digimoney.

In a BTC-centered system there would no longer be any need of banks.

Banks didn't use advanced tech til mid or late 1900s.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 5 days ago +1 / -0

What do you mean? It will be name-changed to "TyrantCoin"? It will be deleted from existence? No, it still will be. Just controlled.

So they will change the system and also the name but it still will be BTC? If I change your essence and start calling you with another name, would you still be you? That's not how identity works.

So what about people who had all their devices snatched by the UK and EU for hate speech? Good luck with that!

And you think they won't confiscate your gold or make such transactions illegal? This literally happened in 1933. Cash is issued by the Fed so the moment they decide, you won't have access to it. I mean, if they decide to put us in camps we won't be able to use BTC also. That doesn't seem like a good argument.

Human history proves the opposite.

Do you come from a different timeline? When did the electrical grid collapse?

Bill gates also thinks that's why you should trust vaxxines. If you don't that must mean you're a Luddite anti science dummy bigot who hates progress and improvement and The New.

False equivalence and strawman.

Physical currency. Digital is good for destroying silly pro-digimoney arguments over vast distances in many countries, but sucky as a literal societal backbone. WALL-E taught you nothing.

Physical currency doesn't work in a world where people don't live physically. You're literally talking to a person on the other side of the Earth. Community should be physical and people should live in such closely-knit communities. But currency has nothing to do with this. The obsession western man has with money itself is misplaced - it's Mammon worship. The only thing that matters is that value is best stored and transferred between individuals and that's what BTC is about.

And create worse and unfixable (by humans) ones. How do you think anti Christ will set up his system?

He will use the technology of the day. Including media, transportation, the internet and electricity. Should we become luddites then? Speculating about the Antichrist won't change much. We're told he will come to rule the world in the end times so it will happen. What you need to worry about is not being deceived by him and staying within Christ's Church to be among the chosen ones.

0.00000001% as dangerous and 100% less usable for control than digimoney.

Dude, the banks and their owners are behind the current system and CBDC. I'd say their control is pretty tight and they're about to go digital making it even worse. BTC is the alternative to that but I'm fed up with making the distinction. Equivocating BTC and CBDC as "digimoney" is stupid. Things can be both similar and different at the same time.

Banks didn't use advanced tech til mid or late 1900s.

It doesn't matter. The point was that banks consolidated too much power via control of the money, leading them to control all aspects of society. It was a crucial mistake to give them that power.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy