According to the Bible, Jesus, the Son of God, hates the Jews. This fact is irrefutable. Jesus called the Jews children of the devil, he called them serpents, and he called them the synagogue of Satan. Furthermore, the first Christians, including the Church Fathers, also hated the Jews. The Christians' hatred of the Jews was extreme. This is an irrefutable historical fact. The fact that the first Christians hated the Jews so much proves that Jesus himself must have hated them.
A counterargument often used to claim that Jesus cannot hate the Jews is that Jesus himself was Jewish. This counterargument makes no sense at all. A Jew can certainly hate his own people. Examples include Nicholas Donin, Johannes Pfefferkorn, and Jacob Brafman, all of whom were Jewish and hated the Jews. Another example is the Jew Tiberius Julius Alexander, who played a decisive role in helping Titus destroy Jerusalem in 70 AD. He assisted Titus in killing approximately one million Jews and destroying the Temple. One more example is the thousands of Jewish Nazis. Yes, you read that right, there were thousands of Jewish Nazis who helped Hitler in the extermination of the Jews.
So a Jew can hate his own people. Even God hated the Jews so much that he wanted to destroy them all in the desert. God was the first to want to commit genocide against the Jews. Read for yourself in Deuteronomy 9:12-14: "Then Yahweh said to me, 'Arise, go down from here quickly, for your people whom you brought out of Egypt have acted corruptly. They have quickly turned aside from the way which I commanded them; they have made a molten image for themselves.' Yahweh spoke further to me, saying, 'I have seen this people, and indeed, they are a stiff-necked people. Let Me alone, that I may destroy them and blot out their name from under heaven; and I will make of you a nation mightier and more numerous than they.'"
No such text.
Here are many texts that don't apply to "the Jews" collectively, followed by all the ones that do, just by doing a simple word study. OP refers to Jesus's treatment of individuals, never of the collective "the Jews". Also, he said the synagogue of satan were not Jews but Gentiles, so he was equal opportunity with his invective.
Not at all, the first 5,000 Christians were all Jewish and there were a million Jews in Christianity that century. Later generations continued to criticize individual Jews like Trypho (Tarphon). Even if the statement were true it's not an "irrefutable" inference because Christians make mistakes.
You admit that Jews converted to Christianity can still be Jewish, but
youothers deny it of the early church and of Jesus, which is illogical.No such text.
God said "Jacob I loved" (i.e. Israel and Judah). He did not say in Deut. 9:12-14 what he wanted but what he would do if left alone, because he wanted Moses to intercede. We know what God wants by what he does and commands. The Hebrew is a conditional that frames an interrogative of whether the hearer agrees with the hypothetical.
You are so much fun to refute on behalf of the lurkers. I also pray that sooner or later you may come to full knowledge of the truth in Jesus, because I appreciate that you sometimes change tack when refuted. If you want to larp as a conservative American in this nationality-privacy zone, you would do well to learn how to accept criticism graciously and acknowledge it and make adjustments as a result; it would do wonders for your earnings and your friends' acceptance of how much outreach you've gotten done.
I think it would be far better for probable Muslims like you if you reached out with how much shariah law is like Christian moral law and Jewish torah. You could emphasize that shariah and torah are the same word. By making the occasional concession about the ahadith that need not be emphasized because they're Muslim-disputed and objectionable, you would gain many concessions from the Christians and Jews about how much their law is like shariah. For instance, if you said no mainstream Muslim really believes Muhammad molested Hasan and Husain and that's only a discredited fringe tradition, then you might get Christians and Jews more comfortable fitting together their sabbaths with the jumu'ah. If your goal is to promote shariah triumphalistically, you would do better to commend it forthrightly rather than to try to drive wedges between Jews and Christians.