Thank you Joe for agreeing we need reasonable definitions of violations like spam. Your statement, which was false as I disputed, doesn't look like spam, but 20 posts on the Fed alone in an hour would be. If exact boundaries need to be set by the mod, that can be done, but in my experience rules of thumb work better, i.e. definitions with slight leeway. Spam is a TOS violation because TOS include forum rules, which deprecate spam two different ways.
If only that was
True
A ToS violation
The spam argument fails because you're trying to reinvent the definition to fit anything you don't like.
Thank you Joe for agreeing we need reasonable definitions of violations like spam. Your statement, which was false as I disputed, doesn't look like spam, but 20 posts on the Fed alone in an hour would be. If exact boundaries need to be set by the mod, that can be done, but in my experience rules of thumb work better, i.e. definitions with slight leeway. Spam is a TOS violation because TOS include forum rules, which deprecate spam two different ways.
u/DresdenFirebomber