Think about it, think about it... Why did Jesus overturn the money tables in the temple? Why did Jesus hate the Jews? Perhaps because the Jews were capitalists? Because the Jews had turned the temple into a cursed BANK?
Nope, Jesus didn't hate "the Jews" because he was Jewish and saved millions of Jews who called on him, and it wasn't "the Jews" collectively that repurposed the temple but individual merchants who were rejected by the populace who championed Jesus's work. I guess we could say they had made it a "cursed bank" since it became a public treasury of corban overseen by a clan of Zadokites (Sadducees). Capitalism and free market were not the problem, statist central control was the problem.
There you go again conflating modern rabbinic judaism with 2nd temple religious practice. Never mind that there were five main sects then the temple was destroyed, one of which was Christianity, and that the foundational documents of rabbinic judaism were written by pharasees. Nah, keep conflating the Messiah with the people who explicitly reject Him.
I'm usually pretty good about those distinctions you mention. How does a "people" "explicitly reject" another person? That could only happen by delegated authority, could it not? You do realize that "Peter I" explicitly said that hundreds of those who called for Jesus's death were among the first 5,000 Orthodox Christians, Acts 3-4? Kind of takes the burden off the collective and puts it on the unrepentant.
Jesus didn't hate "the Jews", he revealed wrath upon that segment of Jews that continued to reject him, most all the Sadducees and Herodians and a hefty group of Pharisees. Essenes and Zealots faded of their own, and there were smaller sects too. And it wasn't "the Jews" collectively who repurposed the temple, it was a handful of bankster Jews who had forgotten how Nehemiah kicked Geshem the Arab out of the temple. We could name the six children of Annas, all six of whom were in the high priest's office (Mrs. Caiaphas by marriage), who were intimately connected with approving merch kiosks for the few unscrupulous. The people (i.e. "the Jews") loved Jesus, shown by approbation, and would have proclaimed him Messiah-King immediately if he had permitted.
So via 70 the ethnic Jews found themselves in the two main branches, the Messianics who were one with the Christians and mostly faded ethnically among them, and the Pharisees who became Amoraim (Rabbinicals). In every century there are individual Jews who affirm and join the Messianic portion of the Jewish heritage. I really don't see how your mostly correct observations discount anything I said. Maybe you're alluding to some "Jesus wasn't Jewish" line that isn't obvious on its face, but I don't think so.
Now think very carefully about why the Nazis were Socialists and hated the Jews. Think about it!
Think about it, think about it... Why did Jesus overturn the money tables in the temple? Why did Jesus hate the Jews? Perhaps because the Jews were capitalists? Because the Jews had turned the temple into a cursed BANK?
They were lied about more than anyone else in history
Hitler said: "Because we are Socialists, we are anti-Semites." Use your head, think, think. Is that too hard for you to understand?
Nope, Jesus didn't hate "the Jews" because he was Jewish and saved millions of Jews who called on him, and it wasn't "the Jews" collectively that repurposed the temple but individual merchants who were rejected by the populace who championed Jesus's work. I guess we could say they had made it a "cursed bank" since it became a public treasury of corban overseen by a clan of Zadokites (Sadducees). Capitalism and free market were not the problem, statist central control was the problem.
There you go again conflating modern rabbinic judaism with 2nd temple religious practice. Never mind that there were five main sects then the temple was destroyed, one of which was Christianity, and that the foundational documents of rabbinic judaism were written by pharasees. Nah, keep conflating the Messiah with the people who explicitly reject Him.
I'm usually pretty good about those distinctions you mention. How does a "people" "explicitly reject" another person? That could only happen by delegated authority, could it not? You do realize that "Peter I" explicitly said that hundreds of those who called for Jesus's death were among the first 5,000 Orthodox Christians, Acts 3-4? Kind of takes the burden off the collective and puts it on the unrepentant.
Jesus didn't hate "the Jews", he revealed wrath upon that segment of Jews that continued to reject him, most all the Sadducees and Herodians and a hefty group of Pharisees. Essenes and Zealots faded of their own, and there were smaller sects too. And it wasn't "the Jews" collectively who repurposed the temple, it was a handful of bankster Jews who had forgotten how Nehemiah kicked Geshem the Arab out of the temple. We could name the six children of Annas, all six of whom were in the high priest's office (Mrs. Caiaphas by marriage), who were intimately connected with approving merch kiosks for the few unscrupulous. The people (i.e. "the Jews") loved Jesus, shown by approbation, and would have proclaimed him Messiah-King immediately if he had permitted.
So via 70 the ethnic Jews found themselves in the two main branches, the Messianics who were one with the Christians and mostly faded ethnically among them, and the Pharisees who became Amoraim (Rabbinicals). In every century there are individual Jews who affirm and join the Messianic portion of the Jewish heritage. I really don't see how your mostly correct observations discount anything I said. Maybe you're alluding to some "Jesus wasn't Jewish" line that isn't obvious on its face, but I don't think so.