Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was not a Capitalist, nor a Marxist; He was a Socialist! You don't believe me? Then read Luke 18:22-25: "Jesus said to the rich man, 'Sell all that you possess and distribute it to the poor, and you shall have treasure in heaven. And come, follow Me.' But when he heard these things, he became very sad, for he was extremely rich. And Jesus looked at him and said, 'How hard it is for those who are wealthy to enter the kingdom of God! For it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.'"
Jesus commands the rich to sell all their possessions and give the proceeds to the poor, and Acts 2:44-45 reports that the first Christians obeyed this command: "And all those who had believed were together and had all things in common; and they began selling their property and possessions and were dividing them up with all, as anyone might have need." Jesus makes it clear that no rich person can enter the Kingdom of Heaven, for it is impossible for a camel to go through the eye of a needle. Jesus abhors Materialism and Mammonism.
And indeed, Jesus himself obeyed his own command! For according to Luke 9:58, he was just a homeless wandering preacher: "The foxes have holes and the birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head."
Be like Jesus! Be a Socialist and despise Capitalism and Marxism!
I think you missed the point on this one. The rich man tried to make the case that he had followed the law his entire life that he could earn his way to heaven. Jesus was making the case for the grace and mercy of God.
a) God was...before Jesus can come into being with the free will of choice to consent (-ist) to a suggested social contract (-ism).
b) Social implies together (soc) within (i) all (al)...being implies apart from one another within all.
c) Jesus aka je suis (i am) implies taking possession over self aka holding onto a part, which shapes every other part into Judah (you are).
a) All implies process; each one within a potential...taking into possession tempts one to ignore all given.
b) If one lets go of possession (suggested), then all distributes evenly (perceivable) through each one (perception).
c) The conflict between rich vs poor is based on taking possession over one side, which binds ones free will of choice to the other side.
YET, and to quote a jew: "If I don't take it; then someone else will"...
If heaven moves, then treasure implies perceivable inspiration flowing through ones formed perception, not suggested information stored within ones possessive mind.
Treasure in heaven implies value (perceivable) generating evaluation (perception)...not "muh precious" possessions.
Do I start calling you Christcommies now?