I think you missed the point on this one. The rich man tried to make the case that he had followed the law his entire life that he could earn his way to heaven. Jesus was making the case for the grace and mercy of God.
a) God was...before Jesus can come into being with the free will of choice to consent (-ist) to a suggested social contract (-ism).
b) Social implies together (soc) within (i) all (al)...being implies apart from one another within all.
c) Jesus aka je suis (i am) implies taking possession over self aka holding onto a part, which shapes every other part into Judah (you are).
Sell all that you possess and distribute it to the poor
a) All implies process; each one within a potential...taking into possession tempts one to ignore all given.
b) If one lets go of possession (suggested), then all distributes evenly (perceivable) through each one (perception).
c) The conflict between rich vs poor is based on taking possession over one side, which binds ones free will of choice to the other side.
YET, and to quote a jew: "If I don't take it; then someone else will"...
treasure in heaven
If heaven moves, then treasure implies perceivable inspiration flowing through ones formed perception, not suggested information stored within ones possessive mind.
Treasure in heaven implies value (perceivable) generating evaluation (perception)...not "muh precious" possessions.
I think you missed the point on this one. The rich man tried to make the case that he had followed the law his entire life that he could earn his way to heaven. Jesus was making the case for the grace and mercy of God.
a) God was...before Jesus can come into being with the free will of choice to consent (-ist) to a suggested social contract (-ism).
b) Social implies together (soc) within (i) all (al)...being implies apart from one another within all.
c) Jesus aka je suis (i am) implies taking possession over self aka holding onto a part, which shapes every other part into Judah (you are).
a) All implies process; each one within a potential...taking into possession tempts one to ignore all given.
b) If one lets go of possession (suggested), then all distributes evenly (perceivable) through each one (perception).
c) The conflict between rich vs poor is based on taking possession over one side, which binds ones free will of choice to the other side.
YET, and to quote a jew: "If I don't take it; then someone else will"...
If heaven moves, then treasure implies perceivable inspiration flowing through ones formed perception, not suggested information stored within ones possessive mind.
Treasure in heaven implies value (perceivable) generating evaluation (perception)...not "muh precious" possessions.