For some reason, you have a pattern of fixating on specific teachers, here Randall Carlson, and attributing no wrong to them instead of reviewing them critically. I've constantly said Jesus is the only person you can do that with.
My comment on chronology of this dryas view showed statistically that Carlson's trying to force 16 arbitrarily dated events into a range of the precession map under the idea of "one-third on two-thirds off", plus (literal quote) "of course 26,000 you consider a figure plus or minus a few centuries" is, well, astrology. Statistically insignificant special pleading. It's also literally astrology because he's saying his four favorite zodiac signs (granted, Biblically significant ones) happen to govern all cyclical cataclysms, except when they don't. The stated reason: (refuses to elaborate).
Without having looked at most of the 16 events, what I've looked at has shown that geologists stretch the past just like all tall tale tellers. Some of these rely on ice cone data, which is exceptionally easy to manipulate. If you want to pick specifics to focus on so as to narrow it down to most salient cases, we can review that. But he just brings these in with uncritically accepted mainstream dates without even attempting to test whether they fit his imagined schedule because he just assumes they do. "The delivery of cosmic material and energy energy pulses that would be affecting earth are non random": no explanation how, just an assumption that these epochs are "high-risk intersections", supported only by innumeracy.
Did the ancients have supernatural help? We believe so. Is there no artifact evidence of their presence for these half-million or more years? We agree there isn't. But to create the compromise with the old-earth cabal by admitting their dates and theology of death, but then to reject their uniformitarianism, falls between both stools. It's not necessary to assume cyclic catastrophe to explain the amount of evidence if the amount testifies to young earth. It's only necessary to assume it if you already bought the cabal lie of old earth.
If there were 16 civilization-wiping events that destroyed everything except the megaliths, the odds are that they would also make humanity extinct. The odds would be that even the scope of Noah's one deluge in 100-200 tellings would be an ELE. One wouldn't believe anyone had survived if there weren't credible testimony of how, which incidentally also agrees with model shipbuilding and scientific practices.
The evidence of OP is mathematically inconclusive, geologically suspect, methodologically bereft, epistemologically credulous, and predictively impotent. Carlson literally wedded the genii of Aquarian Age and Geologic Column and midwifed the cockatrice spawn of this bastard dyad of heaven and earth.
For some reason, you have a pattern of fixating on specific teachers, here Randall Carlson, and attributing no wrong to them instead of reviewing them critically. I've constantly said Jesus is the only person you can do that with.
My comment on chronology of this dryas view showed statistically that Carlson's trying to force 16 arbitrarily dated events into a range of the precession map under the idea of "one-third on two-thirds off", plus (literal quote) "of course 26,000 you consider a figure plus or minus a few centuries" is, well, astrology. Statistically insignificant special pleading. It's also literally astrology because he's saying his four favorite zodiac signs (granted, Biblically significant ones) happen to govern all cyclical cataclysms, except when they don't. The stated reason: (refuses to elaborate).
Without having looked at most of the 16 events, what I've looked at has shown that geologists stretch the past just like all tall tale tellers. Some of these rely on ice cone data, which is exceptionally easy to manipulate. If you want to pick specifics to focus on so as to narrow it down to most salient cases, we can review that. But he just brings these in with uncritically accepted mainstream dates without even attempting to test whether they fit his imagined schedule because he just assumes they do. "The delivery of cosmic material and energy energy pulses that would be affecting earth are non random": no explanation how, just an assumption that these epochs are "high-risk intersections", supported only by innumeracy.
Did the ancients have supernatural help? We believe so. Is there no artifact evidence of their presence for these half-million or more years? We agree there isn't. But to create the compromise with the old-earth cabal by admitting their dates and theology of death, but then to reject their uniformitarianism, falls between both stools. It's not necessary to assume cyclic catastrophe to explain the amount of evidence if the amount testifies to young earth. It's only necessary to assume it if you already bought the cabal lie of old earth.
If there were 16 civilization-wiping events that destroyed everything except the megaliths, the odds are that they would also make humanity extinct. The odds would be that even the scope of Noah's one deluge in 100-200 tellings would be an ELE. One wouldn't believe anyone had survived if there weren't credible testimony of how, which incidentally also agrees with model shipbuilding and scientific practices.
The evidence of OP is mathematically inconclusive, geologically suspect, methodologically bereft, epistemologically credulous, and predictively impotent. Carlson literally wedded the genii of Aquarian Age and Geologic Column and midwifed the cockatrice spawn of this bastard dyad of heaven and earth.
Praise Jesus!