Without taking any dissuasion from my last illuminating "dialogue" with OP, I find it appropriate to repeat my comments on this video.

So you found one unnamed unbinding rabbinical opinion that Noahide laws, which prohibit idolatry (and which Peter et al. affirmed were not contrary to Christianity), prohibit worshipping a human as God, that a human cannot be God, etc. Unfortunately, actual Rabbinical Judaism does not take an actual theological position on this highly technical and open-ended opinion, leaving it to varying opinion. Since Judaism has its own language that says many similar things, namely that the Angel of the Lord accepts the worship given to the Father, that there is some kind of plurality in God recognized by many passages as taught by Rabbi Simlai, that the physical Torah should be venerated (basically hyperdulia), and that it's possible for an angel like Metatron to share divine privileges, the only question in Christian evangelism of the Jews becomes why the Messiah would not have the position of perfect oneness with the Father. That is, the argument between Jews and Christians is 99% semantic based on assumptions built upon text and proactive defenses, and only 1% based on actual difference, and Rom. 11 prophesies that this 1% will be resolved by Jews coming to know Jesus en masse. When I speak to a rabbi who makes an indirect statement pushing back against Christianity, I seek to winsomely draw the opinion out into direct statement, either the person directly denying Christ, or the person admitting a path to recognition of these Rabbinical Jewish sources of plurality in God that can be refined in due time. Our friend Pizzaballa at the LPJ is seeking to evangelize the Jews too, so I am one with him, though my approach and order is a little different. But the link doesn't logically lead to your assertions, and your approaching the whole subject with key categorizations unchallenged is causing much of the difficulty communicating. Which is why I asked you, how do you personally determine what is true? If it was simply to consult the DRA Bible or various publications of patristics or enchiridia, then we could use those sources, for instance.

Looking forward to more evidence of your actual interaction with my comments and questions. God bless you, in Jesus's name.