Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

4
They carbon dated the Buga sphere to 12,560 years ago. That's older than the pyramids. (cdn.videy.co)
posted 34 days ago by newfunturistic 34 days ago by newfunturistic +4 / -0
8 comments share
8 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (8)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– CrazyRussian 6 points 34 days ago +6 / -0

You can't carbon date anything that was not alive at some point of time.

Carbon dating method based on the fact that atmosphere have known percentage of C14 carbon isotope. Being consumed one way or another from atmosphere, along with normal carbon. After consuming and eventual death of something alive, C14 decays, again with known rate. Since there is no income of atmospheric C14 after death, you could estimate date of death by the content of C14 in remnants. This method works for anything with organic origin, from wood to the human remnants.

It will not work for things that have no parts made from something that was alive - wood pieces, bones, leather, whatever. And certainly will not work for something made from metal alloy.

Also, there are no place in periodic table for any undiscovered rare earth elements.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Another_rando 1 point 32 days ago +1 / -0

Science is a cult. Like any calls if they can't find reason they make a reason. Based on the vibe of the population of their church.

Obviously scientific carbon dating is a hoax for the most part. It has a narrow window of use applied to a wide range of misuse.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 32 days ago +1 / -0

Science is the opposite of cult. There can't be any dogmatic in the science by definition. If there is some dogmas, it is not a science. And you can't make a cult without dogmatic.

Creation and reposting such shitty videos with stupid arguments and idiotic statements - that's a cult.

For years I observe growing flow of idiotic videos with different bullshit posed as "conspiracy news" made by people who have no any clue what they are talking (or making video) about. All that shit looks like relatively huge well-poisoning campaign financed with at least millions and with hundreds of thousands man-hours of dedicated work.

Since al that videos made by obviously stupid people without any technical or engineering skills I suppose it is some leftists with humanitarian education who made them and something soros-like financing it under some "N"GO program.

Such fake videos flood started with coronahoax. Remember that dude with cheap Cisco STB who lied to the camera that he was ordered to connect the PCB of that Cisco thing with SCART connector and other home TV stuff along with TV RF output circuit covered with metal shield box with "COVID" inscription to the cellular tower? Then, the hell break loose, and it is only growing.

Look, somebody make this videos full of shit purposedly, spending hours and days to edit, recording soundtracks, drawing CGI and all that stuff on enterprise level. Isn't that a conspiracy worth some exploring?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Another_rando 2 points 31 days ago +2 / -0

I know it's psy op. They go through a lot more to deliver crap like this. Look at the moon landings. The movie Titanic. 9/11. Entirely fake presidents. They own science and they created virus theory to hide their poisoning of the population.

This little thing, is nothing special

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– 0illuminated1 4 points 34 days ago +4 / -0

I call bullshit

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point 33 days ago +1 / -0

Headline: New groundbreaking man made technology debunks dating methods, proves young earth.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– newfunturistic [S] 0 points 34 days ago +1 / -1

Video to text transcript: Just in the past month, we've gotten the intel back on this weird bugosphere that was found in buga, Columbia, South America. It landed last March, and now we've done the research on it, and this thing is carbon-dated to 12,560 years ago. And it's an electro-gravatic anti-gravity sphere that was spinning and moving all through the atmosphere. It got near a high-voltage wire, and it shorted out and landed. It crashed and just landed, and a guy in Columbia picked it up. When it first landed, it weighed about two kilos. Now it weighs 10. And the reason for that is that if you understand the science behind electro-gravatic high-voltage systems, they actually cause a mass cancellation effect, weightlessness effect. They took about a month or get to its normal weight again. And those metal samples indicate it's an alloy that doesn't match any known alloy, but it's mostly aluminum and then a lot of rare earth elements, some of which were not even discovered until the late 1800s and 1900s. But this thing is 12,560 years old. It's basically 8,000 years older than the pre-parametization.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point 33 days ago +1 / -0

All dating methods that give a >6K date are unreliable.

This sphere is 100% manmade, no matter when it was made.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy