"So do not worry, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or "What shall we wear?' For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own."
Basically, just don't worry about the practical concern of tomorrow as much as getting in touch with God, that will lead you to good things. This one has helped me deal with the lies of the world
That's not what the quote is supposed to mean. I am surprised that nobody got that...
It's clearly for the specific questions:
'What shall we eat?'
'What shall we drink?'
'What shall we wear?'
Not about the general worries of tomorrow, as you stated:
Everyone worries about tomorrow, why do you think we share all this information all the time? So we can change the grim tomorrow at least a little bit.
Actually, I will ask you the same thing using the Bible...
Why is Jesus warning us about the "tomorrow" in the Book of Revelations, and many other examples? Should we just ignore the Book of Revelations? Wouldn't that be against God?
Since your statement is not very specific, and you might use that to say "Oh, I was just talking about eating, drinking, and wearing clothes..." - please show me one example of a person here, who is worried what would they eat, drink, or wear tomorrow. (In case you meant it in this way... In case you didn't, read the above again)
Also, who in here is truly a Christian? Don't you know that's the hardest path you can take in life?
If you honestly cared about Christianity, you would try to pull people to God. However, all you got is people, who already know that God is the true way. And literally none of you is actually following true Christianity, and that includes me.
That's the same as a prophet saying: "Hey, follow the teachings of God. That's all." to people, who already do that.
Isn't the Bible the collection of wisdoms to prove that God is the true way to salvation? Doesn't God use reason to explain why this is the true way? Where is the reason here in your post?
Where is the reason of all you so-called Christians? (Or do you say "believers" or "followers"?...)
Where is the community prayer, so we can pray for the wicked, or those in need?
Where is the teaching of the Bible, so others can understand what it truly means, not to just use it as "the quote I like for today"?
Where is the push to convert others, who are not believers?
I have a quote from the Bible for you, and the likes of you in the comments... Let's see if you understand it:
Matthew 25:14-30 - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2025:14-30&version=KJV
How could a question be specific if it seeks the same answer?
Unto one implies from all to each one..."five" implies counting together what all set apart from one another.
How could God give more than the oneness of God to anyone within?
From infancy to elderly...doesn't anyone change? How does holding a plural (we) together affect ones singular change?
But ones "I" can only ever be different from any other ones "I". Can you show the same "I" (i am aka je suis aka jesus) without ignoring differences?
How could a book reveal if the medium binds in-between covers?
Does God give each being the free will of choice to alter ones position, hence enabling one to choose what to oppose?
What if opposition doesn't move against one another, but instead separates a medium (life) in-between origin (inception) and outcome (death)?
What if the words "against" and "for" have been altered to tempt one to ignore being "a forwarded gain"?
Eating, drinking, and wearing implies ones response to all just(ice) aka natural law.
Christian/khristos - "to anoint"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Christ
a) How could one within all, while separated from one another, not be anointed? What if christ implies the status quo of each one within all of God?
Meanwhile...true implies versus false; a rubbing against one another aka rubbing off of ones anointment.
b) "in here" as in...within God, hence HE(re)...can you hear him here?
What if there's only one path (inception towards death) for each ones life? What if following along implies the path of least resistance, hence the easy way out, while resisting the temptation to ignore resisting implies the hard way?
What if the path given cannot be taken? What if taking given implies taking possession of a given process? Doesn't that ignore a contradiction? How could a process be possessed?
To care/carry implies burdening self, while to christen (anoint) implies being relieved of burden.
What if only God pushes (inception) and pulls (death)? What if people implies an aggregation of beings during the push/pull of nature? What's the difference between that and constipation? Why is the majority of this world (3rd world) called "shitskin"? What happens if the visible spectrum of light is being mixed together? https://img.gvid.tv/i/3X3Jns4N.png
People implies an aggregation of persons within all each one got.
God was before any being within can suggest what is true or false to one another.
a) Literally implies "in accordance to the letter"...all LETS each one wield free will of choice; others suggest LETTERS to bind ones free will of choice, hence accord aka "a cord" (a string to bind).
b) Actual implies "all action"...which generates each ones reaction.
Isn't being a separation from one another within all God was?
You know I'm not gonna read any of your AI responses, right?
How could an artificial construct be "yours"?
Do you know what "nothing" implies?
Still - nobody reads your crap.
Go catch a virus or something, pathetic bot.