Pay attention.

(There are so many bases he is doctrinally sound on. Pretty sure he's sound on all of em.) <-- Outdated, replies in OP thread have now shown why TS believes and says that.

Did you mean ‘false’?

Things can be claimed AS statements of fact, whether the person knows or does not know if the info is false or true.

"No grand conspiracy behind the quote."

Pulled it out of thin air, made it up, completely out of context, irrelevant to the discussion, not even close to anything anyone said remotely related to the topic. So yeah, the conspiracy is “You made up [EPHESIANS 4:29!] for absolutely no conceivable reason.”

Again

Thanks for admitting you didn’t even try. You’re done here.

The two aren't even comparable or in the same category.

They’re both fallacies. And you purposely misrepresented what I said. Try again with some effort.

Well that's what others will believe

Nah, it’s not.

Case study: this exchange.

Your single data point is not representative of anything other than

your individual mental illness.

Nonexistent.

After how long?

About five seconds.

And people are unique, you know.

Objective data metrics aren’t.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

[and more]

P

.