Comet 3I/ATLAS is not expected to get very close to Earth; the closest it will come is approximately 1.8 astronomical units (about 170 million miles or 270 million kilometers)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3I_ATLAS_animation3.gif
Comet 3I/ATLAS is not expected to get very close to Earth; the closest it will come is approximately 1.8 astronomical units (about 170 million miles or 270 million kilometers)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3I_ATLAS_animation3.gif
Avi Loeb has a blog now where he writes these short weird articles. People can say hes just being overdramatic to get views, but he is a lead researcher at harvard. Hes not just some peon.
But I do question some of what he is saying.
But there are alot of weird things about this that arent being talked about. Something that keeps giving me the creeps, they should have got pictures of it friday, im waiting to see if they are released today before I start sweating to hard. Its at least 1 other country than america, but there is another one as well I believe. The shutdown shouldnt affect them.
https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
He even admits in his blog articles, and on tv talk shows, that its most likely natural, just something we have never seen before. But my guess is he knows more than hes allowed to say, talking about a black swan event. I dont need to be convinced ufos are real, ive seen things that hover and shoot off in the blink of an eye. Literally if you had blinked it would have just disappeared and youd think it went behind a cloud.
His latest blog post talking about the perseverance photos everyone is talking about. I came to the conclusion its most likely to the moon deimos. It rotates around mars in 7.3 hours or something and is only 12 miles above the ground while being only 3.9 miles in diameter or something. But there is no way to know that without nasa giving the shutter time. Avi loeb says its a time exposure, but I dont think it is.
https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/multimedia/raw-images/
If you click back to the picture, it has multiple snapshots with the same exact time signature, and maybe the last shot is a exposure, but where is the object in the other pictures with the same time signature. ? Is it a bug?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjGXqk4yVC0
Most likely to be the moon like I explained, but its all just so fucking odd. And this is the kinda stuff I love to talk about but people here are so god damn political and god loving. Most comments seem to be "SPACE IS FAKE AND GAY" lmao.
"33"
You don't see the masonic connection/psyop?
Whats the issue?
If you think God is fake I can certainly touch on that point
The issue isn't with belief in God. The issue is how they've allowed charlatan pastors to treat science like Harold Hill treats the new pool table in the billiards hall -- as a lightning rod to instill moral panic in the town and thus sell his fly-by-night services.
2 Timothy 3:5 . You claim being a Christian, yet you wish to deny the Genesis Account's power and truth value.
If evolution were true, explain why atheists typically gravitate toward it and not some other belief. If God used evo, they would be repelled by it. They are super repelled by YEC.
You and I have a very different understanding of that verse. You're pretty obsessed with the outward appearance of devotion and obsessed with enforcing specific marks of belief, but beyond avoidance of the most obvious and egregious sins there's not much to suggest that your inner life is actually godly, and you doubt the power of God to save anyone who might have a different interpretation than yourself.
Why would being true repel them? You act like an atheist would deny that the two of us are communicating in English, because it is true and atheists are allergic to any form of truth.
It is true that many atheists latch on hard to the furthest stretches of what evolution might imply (i.e. pure, unaided abiogenesis) because it allows them to bypass the largest claim for the existence of God (namely that if there is no God, then there is no universe).
But it is not true that just because many atheists latch on to it that it must be the opposite of the truth. Evolution is derived from observation of large amounts of data, which I know you haven't examined in any degree of honesty -- and by that I mean without having AnswersInGenesis at the ready. The only other conclusion if there is no evolution is that God is more like the Norse deity Loki than the Canaanite deity Jehovah, deliberately planting evidence of a lie just to make people disbelieve.