We could slaughter a million grifters tomorrow but obese black women will still buy chicken sandwiches bcz the sticker on the window and white middle aged women will stick buy SSRIs bcz a doctor thinks he shd.
Autism should not be seen as single condition with one cause
a) There's only one cause for any effect within.
b) Ones consent to suggested aut-ism makes one an aut-ist, which is how others utilize affection to distract effect from cause.
Those others were Paul Eugen Bleuler (coined autism) and Sigismund Schlomo Freud (father of psychoanalysis) who conspired with one another to conquer psychiatry... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg
social interaction
Interaction implies each ones internal reaction within all action...a separation from one another. Others invert this by suggesting social-ism aka together (soc) within (i) all (al).
A being isn't social with one another, but an integer within all...as in...a jewish integer within all socializing gentiles.
There is no "autism"
The conditions of adapting this quickly to societal conditions has been unstable and it allowed psychologists to claim any thing as a form of retardation.
Normalizing literacy is only truly less than 100 years but now the idea is if you can not read well, autism.
Autism flexed on actual mutative retardation and went from there at the behest the pharmaceutical industry.
Grifters can be fixed, a guy named Luigi fixed one a while back.
We could slaughter a million grifters tomorrow but obese black women will still buy chicken sandwiches bcz the sticker on the window and white middle aged women will stick buy SSRIs bcz a doctor thinks he shd.
a) There's only one cause for any effect within.
b) Ones consent to suggested aut-ism makes one an aut-ist, which is how others utilize affection to distract effect from cause.
Those others were Paul Eugen Bleuler (coined autism) and Sigismund Schlomo Freud (father of psychoanalysis) who conspired with one another to conquer psychiatry... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg
Interaction implies each ones internal reaction within all action...a separation from one another. Others invert this by suggesting social-ism aka together (soc) within (i) all (al).
A being isn't social with one another, but an integer within all...as in...a jewish integer within all socializing gentiles.
There is no "autism" The conditions of adapting this quickly to societal conditions has been unstable and it allowed psychologists to claim any thing as a form of retardation.
Normalizing literacy is only truly less than 100 years but now the idea is if you can not read well, autism.
Autism flexed on actual mutative retardation and went from there at the behest the pharmaceutical industry.