One of the best ballistics analyses yet on Charlie Kirk.
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (4)
sorted by:
Definitely worth the watch. This is someone with a verifiable background and He does an excellent analysis of the video evidence we currently have. The hot button point IMO is when He shows the cavitation -expansion still shot from the video. It puts to bed the theories of psyop and Valhalla witsec angle. He definitely took a bullet to the neck.
Still, too many unknown variables to say with certainty where the shot came from EXCEPT that it didn't happen the way the feds are stating.
Remember, the 200 yards and the 30-06 info came really really early after it took place. Almost too early. ✌️ ✌️
A good breakdown that looks at shooting angle and convincingly disproves both the official story and some of the non-official ideas out there.
Though I disagree with his final conclusion of the shooting position, he is spot-on in his work overall. A+.
a) Only within a solution can a conclusion be shaped.
b) Final implies end (fin) of all (al) for each one within.
c) Disagree divides (dis) one against those who agree, hence establishing a conflict of reason aka a synthesis of beings turned against one another aka an inversion of each ones analytical position within nature.
a) Office implies of/ob (to work; produce) fice/facere (to make; do)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/office
b) Official implies all working and producing for each one within making and doing.
c) Ones consent to any suggestion administers another into an "office" above one, which permits another to manage what one makes and does, while one ignores how nature works and produces.
Consent tricks one to work for another, while becoming the product for another.
You keep posting this links to videos on YouTube. Why? other than hardcore normies no one in the right mind still uses this Google platform any longer.