Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

8
5 more years. You ready? You fighting? You resisting? Oiling up? (twitter.com)
posted 74 days ago by Dps1879 74 days ago by Dps1879 +8 / -0
87 comments share
87 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (87)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Neo1 1 point 62 days ago +1 / -0

It's all belief, so before you make the claim that you prefer facts, you should at least understand that you believe a lie about where you are and how you got here.

Prove it.

As for the rest. Like I said. You can't be open to these ideas while clouded with deceptions and motivated by dogma. I understand what you've learned in bible school about the devil and cults and all that shit.

Never went to Bible school. All I learned was on my own.

You claim there is no way I can know there is no heaven or no hell, but same goes for you. It's all believe, but going back to your earlier point, one cannot prove a negative. So you believe in heaven and hell, and I just don't. I don't need to prove they exist, you do.

Incorrect.

I can prove that a real satan exists. And if you can prove that demons and satanists follow his way even today... The logical question is - how did these overpowered demons not yet succeed to overpower all humans?

There must be something standing in their way. And the only rational answer is God.

It's simple logic from 6th grade.

"When You Have Eliminated the Impossible Whatever Remains, However Improbable, Must Be the Truth"

Just because some ideas of mine are also in Hindu, doesn't mean I got them from Hindu. and who cares about Hindu, it has nothing to do with what I said. I get you are trying to debate, but there isn't anything I have you that can be debated, only understood or rejected.

Incorrect.

Since Hindu ideas are older, and you now have the same ideas -> you take them from Hindu.

Have you never studied logic or math?

Why? Because none of this can be proved. Except the earth not being a globe, that is something factual you can just test and watch it fail. Then, maybe you will be more willing to accept different ideas about religion

Do you not know that the Bible also disproves the globe theory?


So far you have provided no proofs of your claims. Logical thinking will say that since you try to defend a theory, you should provide proof, but you're not really listening to logic, are you?

Instead, you're so focused on painting me in the way that I must be believing in a lie... That's not a debate, that's a trick - attack the messanger, not the message.

If you want to debate - go ahead. If you want to accuse and avoid explaining your theory, then I win by default. I don't really care what you choose... I offered you a chance to defend your claims, you couldn't. Can you actually do it now? Doubtful... Very doubtful... So you probably won't.

Remember:

The wicked run when no one is chasing them, but an honest person is as brave as a lion. - Proverbs 28:1

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Another_rando 0 points 62 days ago +1 / -1

Again. I disprove the globe theory. Not prove that it's flat. Test the curvature, it's missing. Test the angle to the sun from two distant time zones at the same time, test flight paths and critically consider the physics from take off to landing from far north airport to an a runway near the equator. So, is that what you mean by "prove it" because there's nothing more powerful than proving something for yourself

I think you lost the point, it was about how you got to this dogmatic state. Attending Bible school or learning on your own, the statement stands

No, you cannot prove devil, demons, or God exists. It's only theory to explain the observation. Could demons be another species? Yes, could angels be souls? Yes, could God be a collective of all souls? Yes. These are unprovable theories. Faith guides you, not facts

And I'm not incorrect about Hindi ideas not being the same as mine. They are different and that's a fact. If you draw comparisons and if you decide I took them from Hindu, then it's your theory, not fact. As for math a logic, Im pretty good. Do you need to see a trophy or diploma before you'll consider my context? Because that is logical fallacy, ad hominem. You can't attack me and think you made an argument against my content.

The Bible doesn't disprove globe theory, it muddied the waters so that people think globe theory is science and anyone else is dogma, cults, religious ignorance. God created the globe in 6 days, come on. Mentions waters above and below the fermament. It's stupid to believe a book over empirical evidence. That is not proof. They all laugh at the bible explanation that earth isn't a globe.

Like I said. I made some claims. The globe is a hoax and we are being lied to about where we are. You can go test them and get back to me. Then we are ready for a conversation.

But these types of abstract topics...you have to accept that you will not get "proof"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Neo1 1 point 62 days ago +1 / -0

Again. I disprove the globe theory. Not prove that it's flat. Test the curvature, it's missing. Test the angle to the sun from two distant time zones at the same time, test flight paths and critically consider the physics from take off to landing from far north airport to an a runway near the equator. So, is that what you mean by "prove it" because there's nothing more powerful than proving something for yourself

You lecture me on math and physics? Pal, I'd demolish you when I was in 6th grade... I know a lot more than you. So spare me the lectures from now on, can you?

I think you lost the point, it was about how you got to this dogmatic state. Attending Bible school or learning on your own, the statement stands

Typical of the losing side to say such a thing. You have shown no proof, only accusations. Hide behind your accusations, coward... You're not the first one I've demolished with facts. You probably won't be the last either.

No, you cannot prove devil, demons, or God exists. It's only theory to explain the observation. Could demons be another species? Yes, could angels be souls? Yes, could God be a collective of all souls? Yes. These are unprovable theories. Faith guides you, not facts

You mistook me for some braindead idiot like you. But actually I investigate and research what I say, so I have 10+ years of experience to share. And you have only your theories.

Weak. You're so weak. I have debated Israeli pathological liars and won, what are you compared to them? A moth? A fly? You talk too much and haven't proven a thing, don't make the mistake that others are as stupid as you are...

And I'm not incorrect about Hindi ideas not being the same as mine. They are different and that's a fact.

Are you trying to convince yourself of this lie?

Pathetic loser. :D

If you draw comparisons and if you decide I took them from Hindu, then it's your theory, not fact. As for math a logic, Im pretty good. Do you need to see a trophy or diploma before you'll consider my context? Because that is logical fallacy, ad hominem. You can't attack me and think you made an argument against my content.

You never proved your point. So, you never offered anything of value. Loser.

You talk to me about math? I bet you were the worst at it, while in 6th grade I was beating the Chinese... So don't compare yourself to me, pal. You'll lose every time.

And you're wrong about everything, that's why you never prove your case. You simply go with accusations that you can't defend. Like the loser you are.

The Bible doesn't disprove globe theory, it muddied the waters so that people think globe theory is science and anyone else is dogma, cults, religious ignorance. God created the globe in 6 days, come on. Mentions waters above and below the fermament. It's stupid to believe a book over empirical evidence. That is not proof. They all laugh at the bible explanation that earth isn't a globe.

I will just let this stupidity of yours speak for itself. :D

Like I said. I made some claims. The globe is a hoax and we are being lied to about where we are. You can go test them and get back to me. Then we are ready for a conversation.

Statement of a loser. You couldn't back any of your claims, so now you imagine one to pretend to win the argument... This speaks for itself.

But these types of abstract topics...you have to accept that you will not get "proof"

You do that. I am way more intelligent than you, so I don't fall for theories without proof. But it's fun to see you try to defend your claims without proof... The hoops you go through to make yourself believable... :D You make me laugh.

Anyway, you're just another propagandist that I have demolished with facts. If you somehow learn to read or research the bs you believe, let me know.

Always here to demolish snowflakes who push the New Age religion.

The wicked run when no one is chasing them, but an honest person is as brave as a lion. - Proverbs 28:1

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Another_rando 0 points 61 days ago +1 / -1

Yes, I lecture you on math and physics, you could learn a lot from me. But your ego is in the way.

Trying to pretend I am losing is just a losers way of not admitting you aren't winning, so you resort the pre calling the outcome. You're projecting.

Your not really like this irl, right? Bragging how smart you are and telling people how stupid they are. Only an idiot would act like this. You're still a globetard, meaning you're way behind.

You keep projecting at me, evidence that you yourself feel like a loser. Sorry for you....

You keep saying I never proved my point, but again, that's what you have done. I explained that first you have to test the theory of the globe yourself before you can understand my point.

So, there's no claim that I have to prove. You are methodically asking for a source or proof, without considering the content. Having broken most of human programming I can easily identify it in others. You, have a very long way to go and you're putting up walls to protect your programming so you might die a gullible wannabe intellectual. Hope not, would be a waste of a good mind.

Because you do fall for theories without proof. And my proof is that you still believe we are on a planet. The end.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Neo1 1 point 57 days ago +1 / -0

Yes, I lecture you on math and physics, you could learn a lot from me. But your ego is in the way.

Are you sure it's not yours? Because I happen to be really good at both of those things... I'm very curious of what I might learn from you... Do you have an example?

Trying to pretend I am losing is just a losers way of not admitting you aren't winning, so you resort the pre calling the outcome. You're projecting.

I'm just quoting you because that's a perfect example of what you said. I think irony just committed suicide because you're just too much...

  • While I speak with examples of what you say, you generalize.

  • I don't pretend anything. I take your words, give you a counterargument, then you avoid a direct reply... A coward does that, not a direct intelligent person. So, if you want to really believe that you are intelligent, well you're not fooling me. You can fool only yourself with that.

  • Where are your answers to all the counterarguments I've made? Missing again? Should I pretend to be surprised this time?

Your not really like this irl, right? Bragging how smart you are and telling people how stupid they are. Only an idiot would act like this. You're still a globetard, meaning you're way behind.

It's "you're" not "your"... But surely you're the smart one and I am the stupid one... Clearly... ;)

Also, I'm not bragging. I'm just showing you what a truly intelligent person is like, and you are not such. Furthermore, did you really need someone to tell you you're stupid? Is that really news for you? You must really be very stupid then... Have some self-awareness...

Should I copy the 3 points from above? How you avoid replying? How you pretend to be smart, but run like a coward from an actual debate?

I simply pointed where you are wrong. And your ego doesn't like it. It's that simple. Also, probably in your eyes an ant would brag about how smart it is because you just can't tolerate being wrong. But guess what - everyone has been wrong at some point. I was... It didn't taste well, but I got over it... And look at you... '

You're still a globetard, meaning you're way behind.

Prove that I am a globetard. When have I even suggested that I am?

Oh, I forgot... You're not going to answer directly... You will simply hide with more insults... (I didn't actually forget, it's satire)

You keep projecting at me, evidence that you yourself feel like a loser. Sorry for you....

:D Irony abounds...

You keep saying I never proved my point, but again, that's what you have done. I explained that first you have to test the theory of the globe yourself before you can understand my point.

If only more teachers were like you, nobody would know anything...

  • "Hey, if you want proof, you have to prove it yourselves. Thank you, that's all for the class today... I hope your parents don't come up to me to tell me what a shitty teacher I am... I probably don't even know anything, but I like to show myself as a person who knows stuff..."

That's you btw. Again, through satire, I point to how useless your actions are.

Just say you can't prove it on your own. Have some dignity at least... But you don't have even that...

So, there's no claim that I have to prove. You are methodically asking for a source or proof, without considering the content. Having broken most of human programming I can easily identify it in others. You, have a very long way to go and you're putting up walls to protect your programming so you might die a gullible wannabe intellectual. Hope not, would be a waste of a good mind.

So, who was projecting?

I think you need to read the fable about the fox and the grapes... (HINT: You are the fox)

Because you do fall for theories without proof. And my proof is that you still believe we are on a planet. The end.

Totally wrong, as usual...

I actually know we're not on a planet, but I can prove it, in contrast to you.

I was simply asking for your proof, since you made the claim, so the burden of proof falls on you. And you couldn't deliver...

So, I will just continue my life with proofs, while you will scream to anyone, who disagrees with you "you need to search for yourself, or you're a fool"... :D

Be honest, how is that going for you? Not good? Totally being mocked for your inability to defend your own claims? I imagine it must be pathetic...

Hey, for the next time you put forth some claim that you can't prove - just be silent. Or research the topic in detail, so you can prove it... but we both know that's not going to happen, right?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy