No it's not. I just don't have faith in genuine conversation with you. Or most people. I can't site because these are my original ideas.
I'm past citations and sources because the authors are programmed tools that come to skewed conclusions.
Posting a citation that population will be culled by 2100 doesn't make it more or less true. Following someone else's ideas and citing them doesn't mean you are speaking truth.
I just don't have faith in genuine conversation with you.
No one cares about your feelings. You are physically incapable of defending your worldview with citations or sources. Your input is dismissed off-hand as being worthless.
I can't site because these are my original ideas.
“It’s true because I say so and I have absolutely no reason to believe this.”
GREAT JOB. YOU’RE CLINICALLY INSANE!
I'm past citations and sources because the authors are programmed tools that come to skewed conclusions.
But your conclusions, of course, transcend such biases.
Posting a citation that population will be culled by 2100 doesn't make it more or less true.
Does, yeah. Does make it more true. Does follow the current asymptotically accelerating curve of population collapse in the white world. Statistical evidence for the continuation of current trends, yep. That’s how citations work.
Following someone else's ideas and citing them doesn't mean you are speaking truth.
Thanks for asserting something no one questioned. You’re still objectively wrong and nothing you believe is real.
Everything you’re saying is either nonsense, strawman, or non sequitur.
Post citations and sources for any of your actual claims actually related to the actual topic of this thread, or don’t post at all anymore.
It’s literally that simple. You won’t do it. Fuck off, yid.
No it's not. I just don't have faith in genuine conversation with you. Or most people. I can't site because these are my original ideas.
I'm past citations and sources because the authors are programmed tools that come to skewed conclusions.
Posting a citation that population will be culled by 2100 doesn't make it more or less true. Following someone else's ideas and citing them doesn't mean you are speaking truth.
Great argument. I definitely believe you now.
No one cares about your feelings. You are physically incapable of defending your worldview with citations or sources. Your input is dismissed off-hand as being worthless.
“It’s true because I say so and I have absolutely no reason to believe this.”
GREAT JOB. YOU’RE CLINICALLY INSANE!
But your conclusions, of course, transcend such biases.
Does, yeah. Does make it more true. Does follow the current asymptotically accelerating curve of population collapse in the white world. Statistical evidence for the continuation of current trends, yep. That’s how citations work.
Thanks for asserting something no one questioned. You’re still objectively wrong and nothing you believe is real.
Yup. My own conclusions. You believe what u want. It's not for me
Congrats on being objectively wrong. Fuck off, handshake. You’re useless.