Gave up on the discussion, huh?

I can't blame you... I have done this also...

Wait, sure I can blame you. Just like I blame my previous faults. That's why I don't quit a discussion...

I thought the knowledge of what a "retrograde planet" really means will make you investigate. You sure you don't want to know this? Just say the word and I will tell you.

Too bad when people don't work for their knowledge... They think it will just fall in their feet, while they haven't done anything for it... Think about it - you're one of 99% of people, who thinks that they have all the needed information... yet, 99% of people are idiots... It's impossible to be correct without defending your point. And you gave up the debate...

If you really think about it, why would true knowledge fall in your feet? If you're scared from a debate, then perhaps you shouldn't have that knowledge, wouldn't you agree?

"Sun is could be cold. And it could use excitation to heat particles, proof, low elevations are hotter than high elevations, where molar density of air "thicker" below sea level, but "thinner" at high elevations."

Do you not account for wind? Because wind cools things down. And greater winds are found in higher elevation. Because mountains don't block them.

I would usually go with wind before I say the big fireball in the sky is "cold".

"If the sun gave off heat, then being closer to it should make it hotter, but we don't observe that. Actually, getting very high, like 35000 feet, and it's -40. Obviously excitation is playing a factor."

What?

The sun is the highest at 3:00 PM (15:00 o'clock). It's how time zones are measured. And that's the hottest time in every zone.

Notice, please. That's the sun DIRECTLY ABOVE US.

Now, you talk about -40 (I don't understand fahrenheit, but either way it should be positive). Explanation:

Do you see the sun at an angle? Is it directly above you in the winter? Or very far away, making a shorter day?

If the sun is above you, and it's -40... then we might not be on the same Earth. But on my Earth, if the sun is directly above you - it's hot as hell. And if it's very far away from you, at an angle, it's very cold. That's normal (because the shortest distance is the.... )

Winter only happens when the sun is far away. But the elevation thing always holds true.

Now I am confused... Did I mistook some of the US measurements previously?

You logic is flawed. Just because o2 can freeze doesn't mean there is a wall. A wall could be made of frozen O2, but that's a theory, not a proof.

Now, you jump to this? xd What is going on? Keep a straight line of dialog please.

Also, "my logic" is clearly not flawed because I didn't made those scientists create frozen oxygen just to mess with you... No, no... It's a real experiment, and you can disbelieve it all you want. Now, your disbelief would be a theory.

I have a proof, which I already provided.

It's fine tho. You're not the first one to miss the 2-3 min video of actual proof I send them and talk incorrectly because they didn't see it...

Also, saline, not sure how it typed silica. Frozen, super saturated salt water is what I meant. Like we have seen in the very deep oceans, lakes of ultra dense salt water that the drone subs could not dive down into.

Right, the salt water, that is beneath the air... Am I narrowing down what you're talking about?

The salt water... that is... BENEATH... THE AIR...

//I'm sorry... I'm trying to be patient with you, but somehow my inner school kid is screaming internally "REALLY?!?"// I am trying to control it as much as possible...

That's your quote:

"Like we have seen in the very deep oceans"

I think a similar concept occurs in space, dome, or whatever you want to call it. Not silica. Sorry for typo.

It's ok, don't mind the typo... The problem comes from the idea that in normal human conditions, you have already saline.

Why would the same saline form in abnormal inhuman conditions? Waaaaaaaaaaaaay above where it is normally forming? That doesn't make sense... It's like saying that you have fingers within your heart because you end up with fingers on your limbs... I cannot process that reasoning...

It's like eating an apply, where you convince yourself that the seeds are on the outside because they are also on the inside... Do you see my reasoning?

Oh, the wandering stars... I forgot about this one.

Oh, you'll love this one. I'm sure. You can disagree with everything else, but once you see it, you cannot unsee it.

Retrograde is the idiotic excuse for why wandering stars don't actually have an orbit that makes sense according to the heliocentric model reverse engineered by the fag masons. Best definition I can give.

Well, I would've given you the answer right now, but you also wrote:

I'm on mobile now, I'll check it out. My theory based on your description is that it shows the sun is not an object but a reflection point, changing location based on your optical angle, ie, your location.

So, I can't give you the answer if you're not trying the test properly...

That's one of my best cards in this debate... I honestly want you to know it because it's undeniable. But try out the site, it's really simply... Very few things to modify... But you can see it, if you follow the instructions. Or just let me explain it. Either way, you will have the same knowledge as I do...

Bottom line - nobody would ever debate you on the topic of "What Retrograde means" ever again.

Wow, I tend to ramble a lot into meaningless text and this makes the comment too long...

Also, I am coming back from a long replying to hateful comments on other platforms, and you'd understand how this feels, so if I vent feelings that makes me look like an ass, just consider me as an ass. But take the arguments and consider them without the venting, if you can.

I would appreciate that because I truly mean well, although I don't express it in the best way all the time.

I would be happy to ready your reply soon! :)