This is gonna be a pretty long one but you got conspiracy going on in this stuff. Like it's pretty bad. The quran has the Jesus dude in it but when he was going to get crucified, Yahweh switches him out with Judas, that ratted on him and he's the one who gets hanged. They say there was no resurrection.
This is a bit like a channeled book like the 80's Ra material. You get odd stuff though like what's going on in the bible with the rapture at the end. The Allah dude is like Yahweh and I know all about that, eh. So it seems like similar stuff. Let's get into it and continued in lots of comment parts.
Hold on here.. though.. see I originally thought this Mohammed guy was like an Arab Jesus.. lol. No. He's just some dude that tripped out. lol. But what's going on here.. is similar to the Bible.. you get yahweh that wants us to know this stuff, eh. That's back in the good old days when he used to step in with his operation. Now he doesn't give a flying fuck at all. lol.
But yeah.. so this Allah dude is actually Yahweh.. but it's the arab way of talking about it. Same dude. I've been analysing yahweh over the years and he's got issues. lol. Let's get into this stuff here.
==============================
the quran.. what's the story in there. Like the Arab Jesus but he didn't get crucified? What happend to this mohammed guy.
The Quran, which Muslims believe is the final revelation from God, contains its own narrative on these key figures of Islam. The stories of both Jesus and Muhammad are central to the faith, but they differ significantly from what is found in Christian traditions.
Jesus in the Quran In the Quran, Jesus is known as Isa (or Isa ibn Maryam, "Jesus, son of Mary"). He is revered as one of the most important prophets and is considered the Messiah (Al-Masih).
A Miraculous Birth: The Quran affirms that Jesus was born to the Virgin Mary through a miraculous act of God. It describes the angel Gabriel announcing to Mary that she would give birth to a son, even though she was a virgin.
A Prophet and Messenger: Muslims believe Jesus was a prophet sent by God to the Children of Israel to confirm the teachings of the Torah and bring the Gospel (Injil). He is said to have performed many miracles, such as healing the sick and raising the dead, all "by God's permission."
The Rejection of Crucifixion: This is the most significant difference from the Christian narrative. The Quran explicitly states that Jesus was not killed or crucified. Instead, it says, "it was made to appear so to them." The belief is that God raised Jesus directly to himself, and he did not die on the cross. Muslims believe that Jesus will return to Earth before the Day of Judgment to establish justice.
The Prophet Muhammad Muhammad is considered the final prophet in Islam, a messenger who received the Quran from God.
Life and Mission: Muhammad was born in Mecca around 570 CE. He was a merchant who, at the age of 40, began receiving divine revelations through the angel Gabriel. These revelations, which continued throughout his life, form the text of the Quran.
Spread of Islam: After facing persecution in Mecca, Muhammad and his followers migrated to the city of Medina in 622 CE. This event, known as the Hijra, marks the beginning of the Islamic calendar. In Medina, Muhammad established the first Muslim community and grew in influence, eventually returning to Mecca as a conqueror in 630 CE.
His Death: The Prophet Muhammad died in 632 CE in Medina after a brief illness. He is buried there in what is now a part of the Prophet's Mosque, a major pilgrimage site for Muslims. Unlike Jesus in the Quranic narrative, there is no ambiguity about his death. He lived a full life and died a natural death.
so what exactly did this guy do.. doesn't sound like miracles.. but yeah.. jesus is in the quaran?
Your question gets to a key difference between Islam and other monotheistic religions. While Jesus is a central figure in both Christianity and Islam, his role and nature are viewed very differently.
Jesus in the Quran You are correct that Jesus is in the Quran. He is mentioned by name over 25 times and is a highly revered prophet. In Islam, he is known as Isa (or Isa ibn Maryam, "Jesus, son of Mary") and is considered the Messiah. Muslims believe he was born to the Virgin Mary through a miracle of God and was sent to the Children of Israel to bring the Gospel (Injil) and confirm the Torah. The Quran describes him as having performed many miracles, such as healing the sick and raising the dead, but always with the permission of God.
However, the Quran rejects the Christian belief that Jesus is the son of God or part of a Trinity. He is seen as a great prophet, but still a human being and a servant of God.
Muhammad's Role You noted that Muhammad's actions don't sound like "miracles" in the traditional sense, and that's an important distinction. The primary "miracle" of Muhammad in Islam is the Quran itself. Muslims believe that the Quran is the verbatim word of God, revealed to Muhammad, an unlettered man, over a period of 23 years. The text is considered inimitable and a direct sign from God.
Beyond receiving the Quran, Muhammad's role was to establish the religion and the community of Islam. He:
Preached Monotheism: He called for a return to the worship of one God (Allah) and rejected the polytheistic practices common in pre-Islamic Arabia.
Established a Community: After facing persecution in Mecca, he and his followers migrated to Medina, where he became a political and spiritual leader, uniting different tribes and establishing the first Muslim state.
Provided a Moral Example: His life, actions, and sayings (known as the Sunnah and Hadith) are considered a perfect example for Muslims to follow in all aspects of their lives—from prayer and family relations to business and justice.
ok so he was just a dude that got like this download of information and he transcribed it to the quaran
That's a good way to put it, as long as you understand the nuance. From an Islamic perspective, it wasn't just a "download" in a passive sense. It was a profound, and often physically intense, process of divine revelation.
Here's how Muslims understand the process:
The Medium of Revelation: The revelations were not directly from God to Muhammad in a conversational way. They came through the Angel Gabriel (Jibreel in Arabic). Gabriel would bring the exact words of God to Muhammad.
The Experience: The experience of receiving a revelation was described by Muhammad himself as being very difficult. His companions noted that he would sometimes sweat profusely, even on a cold day, and a heavy feeling would come over him. It was a state of intense spiritual concentration and transformation.
Dictation, not Transcription: Since Muhammad, according to Islamic belief, was unlettered and could neither read nor write, he couldn't have just "transcribed" the information. Instead, he would immediately recite the verses to his companions, who would then memorize them and write them down on whatever materials were available at the time, such as leather, stones, or palm leaves.
Gradual Process: The revelations did not come all at once. They were revealed in stages over a period of 23 years, from the time he first began receiving them until his death. The verses often came in response to specific events, questions, or needs of the early Muslim community. This gradual process allowed the teachings to be absorbed and implemented over time.
So, while the end result was a book—the Quran—it's viewed as the direct, verbatim word of God, not something Muhammad composed or merely "transcribed." His role was to receive the message, convey it accurately, and embody its teachings as a living example for humanity.
ok.. damn.. he wasn't even able to read or write but he'd have this Angel Gabriel tell him stuff.. then he'd say what he was experiencing and his buddies were the ones who wrote it down
That's exactly the core of the Islamic belief regarding the revelation of the Quran.
You've captured the key components:
The Messenger: Muhammad, who was unlettered (unable to read or write), and therefore, from a religious perspective, an unlikely candidate to author a book of such literary complexity and scope.
The Medium: The Angel Gabriel acting as the intermediary, delivering the divine message.
The Process: Muhammad would receive the revelation and immediately recite it.
The Scribes: His companions, who were literate, would listen, memorize, and write down the verses, creating the first written copies of the Quran.
This account of the revelation is central to Islamic theology and serves as a powerful argument for the divine origin of the Quran. The fact that the prophet was unlettered is seen as proof that the text could not have been his own work, but must have come from a higher source.
This is kind of interesting though how the Jesus dude was in their book.. but they're saying he was just a prophet and not this son of god or something, eh?
Yes, that is a very astute observation and it gets to the heart of the theological differences between Islam and Christianity.
The way Jesus is portrayed in the Quran is one of the most interesting and significant aspects of Islamic belief. He is not a minor figure; he is central to the line of prophets. Muslims hold him in great reverence, but their understanding of him is fundamentally different from that of Christians.
Prophet, not Deity: In the Quran, Jesus is consistently referred to as a messenger and prophet of God, in the same line as Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Muhammad. He is given special titles like "the Messiah" and "a word from God," and his miraculous birth is affirmed. However, these titles are interpreted in a way that does not elevate him to a divine status or make him the literal son of God.
The Concept of "Shirk": The Islamic belief system is built on the absolute oneness of God (known as Tawhid). The idea of God having a son or being part of a trinity is seen as a form of shirk, which means "associating partners with God." In Islam, this is considered the most serious and unforgivable sin. The Quran explicitly states that Jesus was a servant of God and that he himself never claimed to be divine.
The Role of Other Prophets: For Muslims, all the major prophets, including Jesus, brought the same core message: to worship the one true God alone. The Quran argues that over time, the messages of earlier prophets were distorted or corrupted by people. Thus, Muhammad was sent as the final prophet to restore and perfect the original, pure message of Islam.
So, while Christians see the crucifixion and resurrection as the central events of Jesus's mission—the means by which humanity's sins are forgiven—Muslims see his life as a powerful example of a prophet, and the Quranic denial of his crucifixion serves to preserve the principle of God's absolute power and Jesus's status as a human prophet. It's a fascinating example of how two major world religions share a key historical figure but interpret his life and purpose in profoundly different ways.
I don't think most people who are christian even know the jesus dude is in this arab bible..
You've touched upon a really important point. It's true that for many Christians, especially those who aren't deeply involved in interfaith studies or dialogue, the idea of Jesus being a significant figure in the Quran comes as a surprise. The religious narratives are so different that there's a general lack of awareness about this shared figure.
Here's why that might be the case and how the two perspectives can be seen in light of one another:
-
The Centrality of the Narratives: For Christians, the core of the faith revolves around the divinity of Jesus, his crucifixion, and his resurrection. These events are seen as the means of salvation. Since the Quran denies the crucifixion and resurrection, it fundamentally changes the narrative in a way that is difficult for many Christians to reconcile with their own beliefs. This denial of a central tenet can lead to a sense that the Quranic account is "wrong" or irrelevant, without necessarily knowing the details of what it actually says.
-
Focus on Divergence, Not Convergence: In much of the public conversation about Christianity and Islam, the focus is on their differences—the nature of God (Trinity vs. absolute oneness), the role of Jesus (divine Son vs. Prophet), and the final authority (Bible vs. Quran). The points of convergence, like the virgin birth and Jesus's role as a miracle-working messiah, are often overlooked in favor of the more contentious theological divides.
-
Historical and Cultural Distance: For centuries, Christianity and Islam have developed in different cultural and theological contexts, often with limited exposure to each other's sacred texts. The popular understanding of each religion is often shaped more by media, politics, and historical conflicts than by an accurate knowledge of their foundational texts.
Despite these differences, there is a growing field of interfaith dialogue where scholars, theologians, and regular people from both faiths are exploring these shared stories. They find that the Quran's portrayal of Jesus can serve as a bridge, a point of common ground that allows for mutual understanding and respect, even if the core beliefs about his ultimate nature remain distinct.
[Continued in comments]
[extra add-on after part 8]
As I'm transcribing this.. was like.. that research several weeks ago. That guy in the 80's in Jerusalem, who was doing archaeology, digging around under where Jesus got crucified. Finds the ark of the covenant was just under there so the blood would soak down on it. Well.. he got the shaft cause that was Judas's blood. lol.
Lemme get that research stuff.
"Looking into the Ron Wyatt excavation stuff from the 80's. He was digging under where Jesus got crucified. Back then was an earthquake during and his blood went down. Like 20 feet and it went on the ark. 3 Angels guarding wouldn't let him take it out. You can go down there and view it."
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/19Ba8KTvtb/looking-into-the-ron-wyatt-excav/c
"Looking into these claims. Well, you got the Wyatt Archaeological Museum in Cornersville, Tennessee.. but google, right side knowledge panel says it's "Permanently closed". This one's a bit of a doozy here, eh."
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/19Ba8KT6YC/looking-into-these-claims-well-y/c
You got trouble here cause they ran DNA tests on that blood.
I'll get a transcript of that vid.
Beneath the rock of Golgotha, right where Jesus was crucified, there is a cave. In this cave, explorer Ron Wyatt claims to have found the real ark of the covenant. What's so incredible about this discovery is that exactly where the ark was placed, there was a crack leading up to the spot where Jesus was crucified. Not only that, but there was a red trail of dried blood leading from the crucifixion site down onto the ark, which is thought to be the real blood of Jesus. We put an amount of this blood in some normal saline and at body temperature and we swirl this gently for 72 hours. When we put this in a growth medium, the white blood cells were dividing. We were able to get a chromosome count, but there were 24 chromosomes, 23 cries got from Mary. We got one which was the sex determinant or the why, promised Heavenly Father for a total of 24. All of us have 46. We get 23 from our mother and 23 from our father. Now this blood of folks was still alive after almost 2,000 years. The people that did the test thought I had pulled a fast one of some kind on them, never in their lives have they ever seen any dried blood that was still alive.
What's going on here.. now you've got this actual scientific test on the blood.. but it has this odd stuff. The DNA test seems to be more like what's going on with Jesus. With the Quran though, they say it was Judas who got switched and it'd be his blood. He got possessed a bit though, eh.. if this is Judas's blood, what's the deal with this DNA. This is pretty important here.. because if it's Jesus's blood, that means the Quran is lying instead of the christian bible.
This comment was on here and not in google gemini AI.. so I ask it..
deleted the previous lengthy conversation about what's going on in the quran compared to the christian bible.
You wind up with this conflict of interest where the quran talks about how jesus was switcherooed before whoever it was got crucified. Seems like it was yahweh who did that and it was judas the rat that was crucified instead.
You get this odd thing though from my research lately..
As I'm transcribing this.. was like.. that research several weeks ago. That guy in the 80's in Jerusalem, who was doing archaeology, digging around under where Jesus got crucified. Finds the ark of the covenant was just under there so the blood would soak down on it. Well.. he got the shaft cause that was Judas's blood. lol.
Lemme get that research stuff.
"Looking into the Ron Wyatt excavation stuff from the 80's. He was digging under where Jesus got crucified. Back then was an earthquake during and his blood went down. Like 20 feet and it went on the ark. 3 Angels guarding wouldn't let him take it out. You can go down there and view it."
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/19Ba8KTvtb/looking-into-the-ron-wyatt-excav/c
"Looking into these claims. Well, you got the Wyatt Archaeological Museum in Cornersville, Tennessee.. but google, right side knowledge panel says it's "Permanently closed". This one's a bit of a doozy here, eh."
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/19Ba8KT6YC/looking-into-these-claims-well-y/c
You got trouble here cause they ran DNA tests on that blood.
I'll get a transcript of that vid.
Beneath the rock of Golgotha, right where Jesus was crucified, there is a cave. In this cave, explorer Ron Wyatt claims to have found the real ark of the covenant. What's so incredible about this discovery is that exactly where the ark was placed, there was a crack leading up to the spot where Jesus was crucified. Not only that, but there was a red trail of dried blood leading from the crucifixion site down onto the ark, which is thought to be the real blood of Jesus. We put an amount of this blood in some normal saline and at body temperature and we swirl this gently for 72 hours. When we put this in a growth medium, the white blood cells were dividing. We were able to get a chromosome count, but there were 24 chromosomes, 23 cries got from Mary. We got one which was the sex determinant or the why, promised Heavenly Father for a total of 24. All of us have 46. We get 23 from our mother and 23 from our father. Now this blood of folks was still alive after almost 2,000 years. The people that did the test thought I had pulled a fast one of some kind on them, never in their lives have they ever seen any dried blood that was still alive.
What's going on here.. now you've got this actual scientific test on the blood.. but it has this odd stuff. The DNA test seems to be more like what's going on with Jesus. With the Quran though, they say it was Judas who got switched and it'd be his blood. He got possessed a bit though, eh.. if this is Judas's blood, what's the deal with this DNA. This is pretty important here.. because if it's Jesus's blood, that means the Quran is lying instead of the christian bible.
Than Ron guy seemed genuine.. but you'll say he's bogus.. but hey.. you got some real science here with the DNA tests with odd things. That's pretty important because it could mean the quran is lying instead of how it was seeming like the christian bible was. Or.. Judas could have had this odd DNA.
Ron Wyatt's claims about finding the Ark of the Covenant and Jesus's blood are widely disputed and lack scientific credibility. Mainstream archaeologists and religious scholars do not accept his discoveries, and his claims are considered part of a conspiracy theory rather than verifiable fact.
The Claims of Ron Wyatt Ron Wyatt was an amateur archaeologist who, starting in the 1970s, claimed to have found several significant biblical artifacts, including Noah's Ark, the site of the Red Sea crossing, and the Ark of the Covenant. According to Wyatt's accounts, he discovered the Ark of the Covenant in a cave beneath Golgotha in Jerusalem in 1982. He claimed that during the crucifixion, an earthquake caused a crack in the rock, and Jesus's blood dripped down onto the mercy seat of the Ark.
Wyatt further asserted that he took a sample of this blood to a lab for analysis. The alleged test results are at the core of the claims you've described. The report, as recounted by Wyatt and his followers, stated that the blood sample was "still alive" and contained 24 chromosomes—23 from the mother and a single "Y" chromosome from the father. This unique chromosomal count was presented as "proof" of Jesus's divine parentage, as it deviated from the typical 46 chromosomes (23 from each parent) found in humans.
Scientific and Archaeological Consensus The scientific and archaeological communities have consistently rejected Wyatt's claims for several key reasons:
Lack of Evidence: Wyatt never provided any peer-reviewed scientific papers, verifiable archaeological reports, or independent confirmation of his discoveries. The lab that supposedly conducted the DNA test was never identified, nor were its findings ever made public or replicated by other scientists.
Archaeological Practices: Reputable archaeological excavations are conducted by trained professionals and require documentation, permits, and independent verification. Wyatt's methods and findings do not align with these established practices.
Biological Implausibility: The claim that 2,000-year-old dried blood could still be "alive" or that white blood cells could be actively dividing is biologically impossible. DNA can be preserved for thousands of years, but cellular function ceases upon death and dehydration. Furthermore, the described chromosomal count (24 chromosomes) is not a scientifically recognized phenomenon in human genetics and is considered pseudoscientific.
The Wyatt Archaeological Museum: The closure of the museum and the lack of a tangible, publicly accessible site for the supposed findings further undermine the credibility of the claims. The museum and the foundation were the primary sources for disseminating Wyatt's unproven assertions.
Addressing the Quran and Bible Conflict The premise of your question is based on the idea that these DNA test results could resolve the conflict between the Christian Bible and the Quran regarding the crucifixion. However, because the scientific validity of the DNA tests is not accepted by the scientific community, the results cannot be used as evidence to support or refute either religious text.
The Quranic view is that Jesus was not crucified but was ascended to heaven, and someone else (often interpreted as Judas Iscariot or another figure) was made to look like him and was crucified in his place. This is known as the "substitution theory." The Christian Bible maintains that Jesus was crucified, died, and was resurrected.
Without a credible, verifiable scientific finding, the conflict remains a matter of theological interpretation and faith for followers of each religion. The claims related to the DNA of the blood sample are not considered a valid data point in this theological debate.
you got some funny business going on here.. recalled the Urantia book.. that was interesting.. you had later about the Jesus dude.. what did they say about him.. betcha it was like the christian bible, eh.. where he gets crucified
Yes, that's an interesting point. While the Urantia Book is not part of the Christian, Muslim, or any other major religious canon, it does have a very detailed narrative about Jesus's life, and it differs in some key ways from the biblical accounts.
In the Urantia Book, Jesus is presented as "Michael of Nebadon," one of many "Creator Sons" who oversee a portion of the universe. The book does state that Jesus was crucified, died, and was resurrected, much like in the Christian Bible. So, it doesn't align with the Quran's "substitution theory" where someone else was crucified in his place.
However, the Urantia Book's interpretation of the crucifixion is different from the traditional Christian doctrine of atonement. It teaches that the crucifixion was not a sacrifice to pay for humanity's sins to appease an "angry Father." Instead, it was a result of the fear and misunderstanding of religious leaders at the time who saw Jesus as a threat. The book presents Jesus's death on the cross as a demonstration of God's love for all humanity and a way for Jesus to fully live a human life and set an example for others.
So, while the Urantia Book agrees with the Christian Bible that Jesus was crucified, it offers a different theological reason for why it happened.