This is gonna be a pretty long one but you got conspiracy going on in this stuff. Like it's pretty bad. The quran has the Jesus dude in it but when he was going to get crucified, Yahweh switches him out with Judas, that ratted on him and he's the one who gets hanged. They say there was no resurrection.
This is a bit like a channeled book like the 80's Ra material. You get odd stuff though like what's going on in the bible with the rapture at the end. The Allah dude is like Yahweh and I know all about that, eh. So it seems like similar stuff. Let's get into it and continued in lots of comment parts.
Hold on here.. though.. see I originally thought this Mohammed guy was like an Arab Jesus.. lol. No. He's just some dude that tripped out. lol. But what's going on here.. is similar to the Bible.. you get yahweh that wants us to know this stuff, eh. That's back in the good old days when he used to step in with his operation. Now he doesn't give a flying fuck at all. lol.
But yeah.. so this Allah dude is actually Yahweh.. but it's the arab way of talking about it. Same dude. I've been analysing yahweh over the years and he's got issues. lol. Let's get into this stuff here.
==============================
the quran.. what's the story in there. Like the Arab Jesus but he didn't get crucified? What happend to this mohammed guy.
The Quran, which Muslims believe is the final revelation from God, contains its own narrative on these key figures of Islam. The stories of both Jesus and Muhammad are central to the faith, but they differ significantly from what is found in Christian traditions.
Jesus in the Quran In the Quran, Jesus is known as Isa (or Isa ibn Maryam, "Jesus, son of Mary"). He is revered as one of the most important prophets and is considered the Messiah (Al-Masih).
A Miraculous Birth: The Quran affirms that Jesus was born to the Virgin Mary through a miraculous act of God. It describes the angel Gabriel announcing to Mary that she would give birth to a son, even though she was a virgin.
A Prophet and Messenger: Muslims believe Jesus was a prophet sent by God to the Children of Israel to confirm the teachings of the Torah and bring the Gospel (Injil). He is said to have performed many miracles, such as healing the sick and raising the dead, all "by God's permission."
The Rejection of Crucifixion: This is the most significant difference from the Christian narrative. The Quran explicitly states that Jesus was not killed or crucified. Instead, it says, "it was made to appear so to them." The belief is that God raised Jesus directly to himself, and he did not die on the cross. Muslims believe that Jesus will return to Earth before the Day of Judgment to establish justice.
The Prophet Muhammad Muhammad is considered the final prophet in Islam, a messenger who received the Quran from God.
Life and Mission: Muhammad was born in Mecca around 570 CE. He was a merchant who, at the age of 40, began receiving divine revelations through the angel Gabriel. These revelations, which continued throughout his life, form the text of the Quran.
Spread of Islam: After facing persecution in Mecca, Muhammad and his followers migrated to the city of Medina in 622 CE. This event, known as the Hijra, marks the beginning of the Islamic calendar. In Medina, Muhammad established the first Muslim community and grew in influence, eventually returning to Mecca as a conqueror in 630 CE.
His Death: The Prophet Muhammad died in 632 CE in Medina after a brief illness. He is buried there in what is now a part of the Prophet's Mosque, a major pilgrimage site for Muslims. Unlike Jesus in the Quranic narrative, there is no ambiguity about his death. He lived a full life and died a natural death.
so what exactly did this guy do.. doesn't sound like miracles.. but yeah.. jesus is in the quaran?
Your question gets to a key difference between Islam and other monotheistic religions. While Jesus is a central figure in both Christianity and Islam, his role and nature are viewed very differently.
Jesus in the Quran You are correct that Jesus is in the Quran. He is mentioned by name over 25 times and is a highly revered prophet. In Islam, he is known as Isa (or Isa ibn Maryam, "Jesus, son of Mary") and is considered the Messiah. Muslims believe he was born to the Virgin Mary through a miracle of God and was sent to the Children of Israel to bring the Gospel (Injil) and confirm the Torah. The Quran describes him as having performed many miracles, such as healing the sick and raising the dead, but always with the permission of God.
However, the Quran rejects the Christian belief that Jesus is the son of God or part of a Trinity. He is seen as a great prophet, but still a human being and a servant of God.
Muhammad's Role You noted that Muhammad's actions don't sound like "miracles" in the traditional sense, and that's an important distinction. The primary "miracle" of Muhammad in Islam is the Quran itself. Muslims believe that the Quran is the verbatim word of God, revealed to Muhammad, an unlettered man, over a period of 23 years. The text is considered inimitable and a direct sign from God.
Beyond receiving the Quran, Muhammad's role was to establish the religion and the community of Islam. He:
Preached Monotheism: He called for a return to the worship of one God (Allah) and rejected the polytheistic practices common in pre-Islamic Arabia.
Established a Community: After facing persecution in Mecca, he and his followers migrated to Medina, where he became a political and spiritual leader, uniting different tribes and establishing the first Muslim state.
Provided a Moral Example: His life, actions, and sayings (known as the Sunnah and Hadith) are considered a perfect example for Muslims to follow in all aspects of their lives—from prayer and family relations to business and justice.
ok so he was just a dude that got like this download of information and he transcribed it to the quaran
That's a good way to put it, as long as you understand the nuance. From an Islamic perspective, it wasn't just a "download" in a passive sense. It was a profound, and often physically intense, process of divine revelation.
Here's how Muslims understand the process:
The Medium of Revelation: The revelations were not directly from God to Muhammad in a conversational way. They came through the Angel Gabriel (Jibreel in Arabic). Gabriel would bring the exact words of God to Muhammad.
The Experience: The experience of receiving a revelation was described by Muhammad himself as being very difficult. His companions noted that he would sometimes sweat profusely, even on a cold day, and a heavy feeling would come over him. It was a state of intense spiritual concentration and transformation.
Dictation, not Transcription: Since Muhammad, according to Islamic belief, was unlettered and could neither read nor write, he couldn't have just "transcribed" the information. Instead, he would immediately recite the verses to his companions, who would then memorize them and write them down on whatever materials were available at the time, such as leather, stones, or palm leaves.
Gradual Process: The revelations did not come all at once. They were revealed in stages over a period of 23 years, from the time he first began receiving them until his death. The verses often came in response to specific events, questions, or needs of the early Muslim community. This gradual process allowed the teachings to be absorbed and implemented over time.
So, while the end result was a book—the Quran—it's viewed as the direct, verbatim word of God, not something Muhammad composed or merely "transcribed." His role was to receive the message, convey it accurately, and embody its teachings as a living example for humanity.
ok.. damn.. he wasn't even able to read or write but he'd have this Angel Gabriel tell him stuff.. then he'd say what he was experiencing and his buddies were the ones who wrote it down
That's exactly the core of the Islamic belief regarding the revelation of the Quran.
You've captured the key components:
The Messenger: Muhammad, who was unlettered (unable to read or write), and therefore, from a religious perspective, an unlikely candidate to author a book of such literary complexity and scope.
The Medium: The Angel Gabriel acting as the intermediary, delivering the divine message.
The Process: Muhammad would receive the revelation and immediately recite it.
The Scribes: His companions, who were literate, would listen, memorize, and write down the verses, creating the first written copies of the Quran.
This account of the revelation is central to Islamic theology and serves as a powerful argument for the divine origin of the Quran. The fact that the prophet was unlettered is seen as proof that the text could not have been his own work, but must have come from a higher source.
This is kind of interesting though how the Jesus dude was in their book.. but they're saying he was just a prophet and not this son of god or something, eh?
Yes, that is a very astute observation and it gets to the heart of the theological differences between Islam and Christianity.
The way Jesus is portrayed in the Quran is one of the most interesting and significant aspects of Islamic belief. He is not a minor figure; he is central to the line of prophets. Muslims hold him in great reverence, but their understanding of him is fundamentally different from that of Christians.
Prophet, not Deity: In the Quran, Jesus is consistently referred to as a messenger and prophet of God, in the same line as Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Muhammad. He is given special titles like "the Messiah" and "a word from God," and his miraculous birth is affirmed. However, these titles are interpreted in a way that does not elevate him to a divine status or make him the literal son of God.
The Concept of "Shirk": The Islamic belief system is built on the absolute oneness of God (known as Tawhid). The idea of God having a son or being part of a trinity is seen as a form of shirk, which means "associating partners with God." In Islam, this is considered the most serious and unforgivable sin. The Quran explicitly states that Jesus was a servant of God and that he himself never claimed to be divine.
The Role of Other Prophets: For Muslims, all the major prophets, including Jesus, brought the same core message: to worship the one true God alone. The Quran argues that over time, the messages of earlier prophets were distorted or corrupted by people. Thus, Muhammad was sent as the final prophet to restore and perfect the original, pure message of Islam.
So, while Christians see the crucifixion and resurrection as the central events of Jesus's mission—the means by which humanity's sins are forgiven—Muslims see his life as a powerful example of a prophet, and the Quranic denial of his crucifixion serves to preserve the principle of God's absolute power and Jesus's status as a human prophet. It's a fascinating example of how two major world religions share a key historical figure but interpret his life and purpose in profoundly different ways.
I don't think most people who are christian even know the jesus dude is in this arab bible..
You've touched upon a really important point. It's true that for many Christians, especially those who aren't deeply involved in interfaith studies or dialogue, the idea of Jesus being a significant figure in the Quran comes as a surprise. The religious narratives are so different that there's a general lack of awareness about this shared figure.
Here's why that might be the case and how the two perspectives can be seen in light of one another:
-
The Centrality of the Narratives: For Christians, the core of the faith revolves around the divinity of Jesus, his crucifixion, and his resurrection. These events are seen as the means of salvation. Since the Quran denies the crucifixion and resurrection, it fundamentally changes the narrative in a way that is difficult for many Christians to reconcile with their own beliefs. This denial of a central tenet can lead to a sense that the Quranic account is "wrong" or irrelevant, without necessarily knowing the details of what it actually says.
-
Focus on Divergence, Not Convergence: In much of the public conversation about Christianity and Islam, the focus is on their differences—the nature of God (Trinity vs. absolute oneness), the role of Jesus (divine Son vs. Prophet), and the final authority (Bible vs. Quran). The points of convergence, like the virgin birth and Jesus's role as a miracle-working messiah, are often overlooked in favor of the more contentious theological divides.
-
Historical and Cultural Distance: For centuries, Christianity and Islam have developed in different cultural and theological contexts, often with limited exposure to each other's sacred texts. The popular understanding of each religion is often shaped more by media, politics, and historical conflicts than by an accurate knowledge of their foundational texts.
Despite these differences, there is a growing field of interfaith dialogue where scholars, theologians, and regular people from both faiths are exploring these shared stories. They find that the Quran's portrayal of Jesus can serve as a bridge, a point of common ground that allows for mutual understanding and respect, even if the core beliefs about his ultimate nature remain distinct.
[Continued in comments]
[part 8]
hold on.. did I just see that there was a last minute switcheroo and it was Judas who.. like what did he do again.. ratted him out. Did he lie. And that's how Jesus got in trouble.. or maybe that's how they tracked him down. Wouldn't that be ironic if there was a switcheroo where the rat who caused the trouble was the one who got hanged.
That's an excellent point you're making. The irony of the situation is exactly why that's one of the leading theories among Muslim scholars who interpret that verse.
First, let's quickly review the story of Judas Iscariot from the Christian Bible, as it's the basis for this entire scenario:
Judas was an apostle: He was one of the 12 closest followers of Jesus.
He "ratted him out": You're right. He went to the chief priests and agreed to betray Jesus for 30 pieces of silver.
The "rat" part: He was a traitor. He led a crowd of armed men to the Garden of Gethsemane, where Jesus was praying, and identified him to them with a kiss, a prearranged signal.
The "Irony" in the Islamic Substitution Theory The idea that Judas was the one put on the cross is a very prominent belief in Islamic tradition. The Quran says that "another was made to resemble him," and many scholars believe that this person was Judas.
The rationale is that it would be divine justice. Judas, who betrayed Jesus to the point of a humiliating death, was made to look exactly like Jesus and then suffered the very death he had intended for him. So, the rat was indeed the one who got "hanged" (or in this case, crucified). It's a dramatic and deeply ironic twist that underscores God's power and justice in this interpretation.
This belief system essentially re-casts the entire story of the crucifixion, turning it from a moment of sacrifice (as in Christianity) into a moment of divine vengeance against a traitor.
that seems like something yahweh would do, eh.. lol.. I've analyzed his behavior there.. haha
That's an interesting analysis. The idea of a fitting punishment, where the person who caused the trouble ends up suffering the same fate, is a powerful theme.
From a theological standpoint in both the Islamic and Judeo-Christian traditions, God's justice is often seen as perfect and comprehensive. It's a kind of justice where every action has a precise and often ironic consequence, ensuring that nothing goes unpunished. That's why the idea of Judas, the ultimate betrayer, getting his just deserts by being crucified in the place of the person he betrayed, resonates so strongly with that concept of divine irony.
well.. what would have happened if Judas didn't rat him out
From a theological perspective, if Judas hadn't betrayed Jesus, the event of the crucifixion would still have happened. Here's why:
The Christian Perspective In mainstream Christianity, Judas's betrayal was a terrible act, but it was also part of God's divine plan. Jesus's death on the cross is not seen as an accident or the result of a historical mistake. Rather, it is considered the central, necessary event for the salvation of humanity.
The Gospels show that Jesus was aware of his fate and even prophesied his own death and resurrection. He knew that one of his disciples would betray him. The betrayal by Judas simply served as the means to fulfill these prophecies and put the divine plan in motion. If it hadn't been Judas, another circumstance or person would have led to the same inevitable outcome.
The Islamic Perspective In Islamic belief, the situation is different, but the conclusion is the same: Jesus's fate was not in Judas's hands. As we discussed, the Quran says Jesus was never crucified. The act of betrayal by Judas was the event that led the authorities to Jesus's location.
However, God intervened at the last minute, saving Jesus from the plot against him and raising him to heaven. According to the traditional view, God put Judas's likeness on another person, and that person—Judas himself, in some accounts—was crucified instead. So, if Judas hadn't betrayed Jesus, the entire chain of events leading to the "substitution" and Jesus's ascension to heaven wouldn't have happened in that way.
In both narratives, the point is that Jesus's destiny was not controlled by human actions, but by a divine plan.
oh they still woulda nailed him, eh
That's the core of the theological argument, yes. From both a Christian and Islamic perspective, Jesus's destiny was not dependent on Judas's betrayal. The plan for his fate was a divine one, and the events simply unfolded as they were intended to.
so why would yahweh do this switcheroo then.. just to deal with Judas the rat?
That's a very good question, and while the idea of punishing the rat is certainly part of it, in Islamic theology, the "switcheroo" serves a larger purpose than just dealing with Judas.
Here are the main reasons given for why Yahweh (or Allah, as he is known in the Quran) would do this:
To Protect a Prophet In Islam, prophets are God's chosen messengers. The crucifixion was seen as a humiliating and agonizing form of execution. From the Islamic perspective, God would not allow one of His most beloved and greatest prophets, Jesus, to suffer such a fate. The switcheroo was a divine miracle meant to protect Jesus from death and preserve his dignity.
Divine Justice You're right, the poetic justice of the situation is also a key factor. By making Judas—the betrayer—suffer the very fate he intended for Jesus, it serves as a powerful and direct lesson about the consequences of treachery. It is a clear display of God's all-knowing power and absolute justice.
To Correct a Theological Error Perhaps the most significant reason is to fundamentally alter the theological narrative. The Quran was revealed, in part, to correct what Muslims believe were errors that crept into previous scriptures. The idea that Jesus was crucified as a divine sacrifice for humanity's sins is a central belief in Christianity. By stating that Jesus was never crucified, the Quran directly refutes this idea. The switcheroo is the narrative tool that demonstrates that the event, as understood by Christians, was a profound mistake, orchestrated by God to protect His prophet and preserve the true message of absolute monotheism.
So, it wasn't just about Judas; it was about protecting a prophet and, most importantly, correcting a core theological belief.
ok so let's say that Judas didn't rat him out.. Jesus was gonna get hanged anyways, right...
That's a very good question that gets at the heart of the difference between the two theological narratives.
From the Christian perspective, yes, Jesus was going to be crucified regardless of Judas's actions, because it was a divine plan for the salvation of humanity.
However, from the Islamic perspective, the answer is different: No, Jesus was not going to be crucified at all.
The betrayal by Judas was the specific event that led the authorities to Jesus. It set the stage for the dramatic moment where they were about to crucify him. At that very moment, God intervened.
So, in this view, if Judas hadn't betrayed him, the plan to crucify Jesus might not have happened at all, or it might have happened in a different way. But the end result would have been the same: God would have protected Jesus, and he would not have been crucified. The betrayal was the specific trigger for God's miraculous intervention, not the cause of Jesus's eventual death.
ok hang on.. sounds like the Islamic perspective.. if Judas didn't rat him out, he wasn't going to get crucified.. but earlier you said that yeah.. he was gonna get nailed anyways
You are absolutely right to point out that seeming contradiction, and I apologize for not being clearer. I was explaining two very different theological viewpoints, and I can see how it sounded like I was contradicting myself.
Let me be perfectly clear and separate the two narratives:
Christian Narrative Islamic Narrative Was Jesus's death inevitable? Yes. The crucifixion was a central, divinely ordained event for the salvation of humanity. If Judas hadn't betrayed him, another event would have occurred to lead to the same outcome. No. The crucifixion was a human plot that God foiled. Jesus was never meant to die on the cross. Role of Judas's betrayal? A necessary, though sinful, act that fulfilled prophecy and put God's plan in motion. The specific event that prompted God's miraculous intervention to save Jesus and crucify an impostor (possibly Judas) in his place. So, would he have been nailed anyway? Yes, absolutely. It was God's will. No, absolutely not. It was a human plot that was stopped by God's will.
Export to Sheets The key difference is this:
In Christianity, the crucifixion was God's plan.
In Islam, the crucifixion was a human plot that God prevented.
These two views are in direct conflict, and my previous answers should have made that distinction much more explicit. Thank you for making me clarify this.
so you got some funny business going on there.. and yahweh getting ticked off about sticks being put in the bicycle spokes. Anything about Lucifer who was like influencing Judas?
That's a very insightful way to put it, and you're right to see the "sticks in the bicycle spokes" as a metaphor for the divine plan encountering human interference.
In both Christian and Islamic traditions, the figure of the devil (Lucifer/Satan/Iblis) is a key player in tempting humans. However, their role in Judas's betrayal is seen differently.
The Christian Perspective In the Christian Bible, the connection between Judas and Satan is very direct and explicit. The Gospel of John (13:27) states that after Judas took a piece of bread from Jesus during the Last Supper, "Satan entered into him." This verse is understood to mean that Judas's betrayal was not just an act of greed, but an act driven or influenced by a supernatural evil force. The plot was the human "stick in the spokes," but the evil spirit behind it was Satan.
The Islamic Perspective In Islam, Satan is known as Iblis or Shaytan. While he is the ultimate tempter and the source of all evil suggestions, the Quran doesn't have a verse that says Shaytan "entered into" Judas. The betrayal is seen as a result of Judas's own free will and his weakness in the face of temptation, particularly greed. He was led astray by Shaytan, but he was not possessed by him in the same way as described in the Christian narrative.
So, in short:
Christianity: Yes, Lucifer is seen as directly and personally influencing Judas's betrayal.
Islam: Shaytan is the ultimate source of all temptation, and Judas fell for that temptation, but the act was still considered his own.
yeah.. wouldn't surprise me if Judas got like possessed a bit.. plus sounds like they were having dinner.. probably boozing it up. lol.. did they only drink wine in those days or was there like "hard stuff".. my guess is hard liquor if stuff like that's going on cause it ain't gonna be enough with just like beer or wine.
That's a very common thought, especially given how intense the story is. You're right, the idea of a major betrayal over a dinner sounds like it would take a lot of liquid courage.
However, from a historical standpoint, they wouldn't have had "hard stuff" or hard liquor as we know it today.
No Hard Liquor The technology for distillation (the process used to make spirits like whiskey, vodka, or rum) wasn't invented until centuries later, around the 8th or 9th century in the Middle East.
The Kind of Alcohol They Had The primary alcoholic beverages in the Middle East at the time of Jesus were wine and beer.
Wine: This was the most common alcoholic beverage. It was often mixed with water before consumption, but it could be quite potent if not diluted. It was a daily staple, not just a celebratory drink.
Beer: Made from fermented barley, beer was also a common drink, though wine was more prevalent in the specific region where the Last Supper took place.
So, while they didn't have "hard liquor," it's certainly possible to get heavily intoxicated from wine. The Bible and other historical texts from that era condemn drunkenness, so the effects of alcohol were well understood. The kind of dramatic behavior seen with Judas's betrayal, however, is attributed to his personal choices and, in the Christian narrative, spiritual influences, not necessarily his level of intoxication.
oh so they had beer though, eh.. I think the egyptians had beer so it was around. Didn't know that hard stuff wasn't around till a few centuries later
You're exactly right! The ancient Egyptians were masters of brewing beer, and it was a staple part of their diet. It was a safer drink than water and was considered a source of both sustenance and energy for laborers.
The technology to make beer is ancient, but distillation is a much more recent invention. It's a great example of how much our relationship with alcohol has changed over thousands of years.
allright well that's good enough for now with all this
Thanks for the great conversation. It was a fascinating discussion about some of the core differences and similarities between Christianity and Islam, as well as some interesting historical and cultural points.
If you have any more questions down the road, feel free to ask. Have a good one!
[end of conversation for now]