Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

2
Update
posted 100 days ago by Dps1879 100 days ago by Dps1879 +4 / -2

To get you up to date. Nothing you know is reality. All mainstream history is fake. Even geology is nowhere near reality. The citizens need to make their own lessons learned book. We could be farther than we are, we could be swinging on a star. But for sure we would better than we are.

9 comments share
9 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (9)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– Needmorepopcorn 2 points 98 days ago +2 / -0

Time, space, nukes, whether, history, evolution, aliens, voooting, vaccines, wireless technology, the music tuning standard, gravity, earth, gps, the calendar, holidays, presidents, famous people, influencers, all fake and gay.

You know Norther Ireland celebrates 4th of July, its the day of their independence. lol.

When they invented cyan and magenta due to the LED's I think this has more significance on our perceived reality, magicians created new colors. Has a new color been invented recently? I'm not to sure but inventing new things using electricity and runes seems pretty sus. ultimately the tranny movement adopted these new colors.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 100 days ago +1 / -0

Even geology is nowhere near reality.

I wouldn't be so radiacal, but I will definitely insist on experimentally checking absolutely everything that accounted as a "settled science" in geology with available today methods, tools and knowledge.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 1 point 100 days ago +1 / -0

The crazy Russian has limits.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 100 days ago +1 / -0

Undoubtedly I has them. Otherwise, I would have already reformed science into what it should be, from the point of scientific method, that demand proving anything by real, actual, reproduceable experiment. If you can't set an experiment to check your theory, then it is not theory, but unfounded hypothesis, that does not deserve attention.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 1 point 100 days ago +1 / -0

Youre that stupid? That you would assume without challenging or questioning?!??! What a олух

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 100 days ago +1 / -0

I question and challenge everything. That's how conscious humans receive knowledge. Only way to find out truth is reproduceable experiment. If you, personally, can't reproduce experiment, that proves something, then, it can't be accounted as truth. That simple.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 0 points 100 days ago +1 / -1

Nah, you just outright refused it Good luck leaning on your own understanding

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point 100 days ago +1 / -0

Give me strictly scientific, lab-grade, repeatable PROOF your desk exists or else it doesn't exist.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CrazyRussian 2 points 100 days ago +2 / -0

It's easy - you could personally come and check my desk existence, if you need a proof of that. If you couldn't do that practically, for any fair reason, you could only have an unverified theory about my desk existence. It's up to you then, to somehow use that theory in a building of your world view or not.

There could be situation, when something you could personally check is impossible without my desk existence, then, you will have to accept that theory that my desk exists is correct to be able to move further. You could later find a theory how thing you could personnaly check is possible without my desk existence, but until that, you have to hold to the unverified theory that my desk exists. This does not work in opposite way - you can't prove non-existence of my desk disproving theory that depends on existing of my desk.

You can't prove non-existence, but you can exclude existence of something from being a foundation of anything else in your picture of reality.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy