Deep shizzle
(twitter.com)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
Thank you for this utterly absurd and false interpretation of how quantum mechanics works.
All you know is that you hate niggers and you expect us to believe you know anything about life????!?!?! u/tallestNPCever !!!!
Thank you for this utterly absurd and false interpretation of my ideological positions.
Ya get what ya give little bitch.
Irony.
Photon aka photo (light) on (unit)...no matter how often a unit (ray) gets divided; the whole (light) continues to act through each reacting unit.
While photon implies natural analysis...twin-photon implies artificial synthesis. In this case...suggesting an experiment tempts each photon into synthetic mass consensus.
A deception...cutting apart separates units apart from one another. Suggesting dualism (two) tempts each singular unit (one) to ignore oneself for one another.
Two cannot be identical (same), since each one thereof implies a different position from one another, hence the cutting apart.
Photon implies each different unit within same light.
Fiber/bheid (to split) + optic/pos/okw (to see) + cable/kap (to grasp)...splitting ones sight in-between perceivable reality and suggested fiction; tempts one to grasp at the suggested.
Consenting to a suggestion implies "data-transmission" by fiber-optic cable.
S(plit)even + mile (unit of linear measurement)...it's consenting to the suggestion of "seven miles" which establishes an uneven split (reason) + circular measurement (logic).
Light acts; photon re-acts to being enlightened...or to one another, while ignoring light.
Ex (out of) per (by) ment (mind)...all perceivable separating into each ones perception implies differentiation of mind; many consenting to suggestions by few implies a hivemind...that's the experiment.
Ya, sounds cool. I remember leaning this in the early 2000s. And my professor asked us if we believe it. Not just to accept that they were able to split a photon and test it.
So we dove into the science together as a class. And, lone and behold, the foundational premise that they had separated a photon wasnt proven. It could have easily just been observed reaction to consistent tests and concluding that the photons were connected some how when in fact they just measured the same observations and assumed they were connected