Reasoning (worth vs worthless) tempts ones choice off-center, hence from middle into circumference, while ignoring to be one IM (within) MORT (subject to death) of AL (all).
The jews are the most worthless of all men
a) Each jew (singular)...not the jews (plural). Pluralism is utilized to herd gentiles together.
b) Men cannot be ALL...only within one can there be men and wo-men. Calling the collectivization of men "all" represents a jewish trick to tempt the gentile mind to synthesize together what nature analyzes apart from one another.
c) A jew suggests artificial worth to tempt a gentiles FREE will of choice to ignore to evaluate (perception) natures worth (perceivable).
It's gentiles consent to suggested worth, which established a conflict of reason (worth vs worthless) among gentiles.
Ambrose/ambrosios - "immortal" of Milan/medios - "middle"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Ambrose + https://www.etymonline.com/word/Milan
Reasoning (worth vs worthless) tempts ones choice off-center, hence from middle into circumference, while ignoring to be one IM (within) MORT (subject to death) of AL (all).
a) Each jew (singular)...not the jews (plural). Pluralism is utilized to herd gentiles together.
b) Men cannot be ALL...only within one can there be men and wo-men. Calling the collectivization of men "all" represents a jewish trick to tempt the gentile mind to synthesize together what nature analyzes apart from one another.
c) A jew suggests artificial worth to tempt a gentiles FREE will of choice to ignore to evaluate (perception) natures worth (perceivable).
It's gentiles consent to suggested worth, which established a conflict of reason (worth vs worthless) among gentiles.