Glad to hear we're on the same page, or at least in the same book!
There are very few people interested in this area. Of those--to be blunt--almost all have ideas they're in love with that are just totally loony. About a paragraph into any explanation of it, they have to start in with "I think" and a lot of hand waving. There's just nowhere to go with it. How could you, when they are certain they're already "there"?
In my opinion this area is the most important subjects to be studied. That's because pretty much all other "conspiracy" eventually ties back to it. Really, all the pieces fall into place and it all finally makes sense in the full context.
Like, for example, the mysterious Fallen Angels. They are merely the faction of 200 Anunnaki, led by Satan, who remained behind to try to prove that part of the peace deal I mentioned. When you take all the religiosity and occultism out of it, it's a lot like deals we humans make. Even more clear when you put things in their proper order and realize that we learned deal-making from them.
I agree that it's important and super interesting and usually mishandled.
I say 'I think' a decent amount, mostly because I never want to speak for God in a way where I'm not absolutely certain, just to be clear on terms.
I say occultism is not always of the dark kind as in evil but rather hidden things we may not be able to know at a certain time, mostly because we need the pieces gathered, usually over some time, and then we can connect things and see what was 'hidden' to us previously.
To put a finer point on what I meant about, "I think", I have become so attuned to hearing it from the NPC-level consciousness. When you listen closely to the full context it becomes equivalent to, "A claim which I'm rounding up to true." Seriously, start listening super-closely to these people and you'll see a lot of "unassailable truth" begins with, "I think".
I used to use it often just like everybody else, but I've become much more aware of when I do (like when Bill Cooper used to tell people their offspring were "children" and not to refer to them as baby goats i.e. "kids"). Now I take pains to say, "There is evidence to indicate" or "There is a case to be made" or "Given little available data I speculate that" or some other specific phrase. It does get too cumbersome sometimes in a world of social media posts where most can't be bothered to capitalize, so sometimes it's just, "I think".
As to the occultism thing, to put a finer point on that and related to what you said, I've come to realize that all of the type of "occultism" discussed in conspiracy circles (Crowley and Parsons and so forth) is a giant cloud of smoke doing the occulting.
IDK if you've followed any of my posts exposing generational Satanists, but that's the biggest part of the occulted truth. Jack Parsons was a member of one of these families but that aspect is unknown, never mentioned by any researchers. All the "occult" stuff he did is nonsense, entirely unimportant.
Another family is the Parkers. You may have heard the odd coincidence that Robert Todd Lincoln, son of Abraham, was closely involved with the first three Presidential assassinations. Bizarre, right? I just found out his mother's mother was born a Parker. Now it's no coincidence to me at all.
I mean, there's not even an accepted term for that type of information. People studying the occult never mention it, so it's not "occult", and conspiracy theorists seem entirely unaware, so it's not "conspiracy".
It's some pretty strange territory we're in these days.
Glad to hear we're on the same page, or at least in the same book!
There are very few people interested in this area. Of those--to be blunt--almost all have ideas they're in love with that are just totally loony. About a paragraph into any explanation of it, they have to start in with "I think" and a lot of hand waving. There's just nowhere to go with it. How could you, when they are certain they're already "there"?
In my opinion this area is the most important subjects to be studied. That's because pretty much all other "conspiracy" eventually ties back to it. Really, all the pieces fall into place and it all finally makes sense in the full context.
Like, for example, the mysterious Fallen Angels. They are merely the faction of 200 Anunnaki, led by Satan, who remained behind to try to prove that part of the peace deal I mentioned. When you take all the religiosity and occultism out of it, it's a lot like deals we humans make. Even more clear when you put things in their proper order and realize that we learned deal-making from them.
I agree that it's important and super interesting and usually mishandled.
I say 'I think' a decent amount, mostly because I never want to speak for God in a way where I'm not absolutely certain, just to be clear on terms.
I say occultism is not always of the dark kind as in evil but rather hidden things we may not be able to know at a certain time, mostly because we need the pieces gathered, usually over some time, and then we can connect things and see what was 'hidden' to us previously.
I think we learned a lot from them.
To put a finer point on what I meant about, "I think", I have become so attuned to hearing it from the NPC-level consciousness. When you listen closely to the full context it becomes equivalent to, "A claim which I'm rounding up to true." Seriously, start listening super-closely to these people and you'll see a lot of "unassailable truth" begins with, "I think".
I used to use it often just like everybody else, but I've become much more aware of when I do (like when Bill Cooper used to tell people their offspring were "children" and not to refer to them as baby goats i.e. "kids"). Now I take pains to say, "There is evidence to indicate" or "There is a case to be made" or "Given little available data I speculate that" or some other specific phrase. It does get too cumbersome sometimes in a world of social media posts where most can't be bothered to capitalize, so sometimes it's just, "I think".
As to the occultism thing, to put a finer point on that and related to what you said, I've come to realize that all of the type of "occultism" discussed in conspiracy circles (Crowley and Parsons and so forth) is a giant cloud of smoke doing the occulting.
IDK if you've followed any of my posts exposing generational Satanists, but that's the biggest part of the occulted truth. Jack Parsons was a member of one of these families but that aspect is unknown, never mentioned by any researchers. All the "occult" stuff he did is nonsense, entirely unimportant.
Another family is the Parkers. You may have heard the odd coincidence that Robert Todd Lincoln, son of Abraham, was closely involved with the first three Presidential assassinations. Bizarre, right? I just found out his mother's mother was born a Parker. Now it's no coincidence to me at all.
I mean, there's not even an accepted term for that type of information. People studying the occult never mention it, so it's not "occult", and conspiracy theorists seem entirely unaware, so it's not "conspiracy".
It's some pretty strange territory we're in these days.
I've read probably all your posts, it's so interesting to me the connections out there and I'm glad you can see it and then share that info.
Finding what's going on beyond the smoke and mirrors (bread and circuses) is one of my biggest 'hobbies'.