I hate to point out information at odds with a Trump "truth" and every jackhole with a keyboard at r/conspiracy, but several hours after the purported attack, we should take a look at what the Iranians themselves are saying about this outrageous act of war that will surely lead to a regional conflagration.
The state-owned propaganda outlet aimed at the West, PressTV has exactly one article:
Iran's atomic body condemns American assault on nuclear sites, vows legal action (PressTV 6/22/2025)
In a strongly worded statement early Saturday morning, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) condemned the aggression on the country’s nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, which have been claimed by the United States.
Slow down, Iran! What's next, a strongly-worded Letter to the Editor of the New York Times? They also apparently had to learn about it from Trump's tweet rather than things blowing up in Iran. They also failed to mention one of the obliterated sites.
Okay, what about the fiery Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, responsible for a big part of the problem with Iran to begin with? Two of their most important officers were killed (or were they?) in the first Israeli strike.
The IRGC is in charge of all the missiles currently raining down on Israel, and they're surely going to let us know about the Islamic fire and Jihadi fury that is soon to be raining down upon the Great Satan. Death to America! Here's comes the voice of vengeance in their semi-official press outlet, Tasnim News Agency.
As of this writing, there is not a single story on the "US attack". For the record, the top story is:
Iran Won’t Forgo Nuclear Rights: President (Tasnim News 6/21/2025)
I guess we'll just have to stay tuned for how they're going to smoke all the Amreekan infidels. They could not be bothered to comment on it yet.
There is a big difference, even just in what you say. I have come to find--very regrettably--that in order to figure out what's going on in the world I may have to disagree with every other person on the face of the earth. It is not comfortable or convenient.
Few seem willing to do that, which to me is the big hindrance to progress. Plus, they already know what's going on in the world so why trouble themselves so profoundly?
Somebody once said that if cocaine just made you throw up, no one would be addicted to cocaine. Truth, I have found, is much the same way.
I don't mind starting with disagreements. Seems like a non starter to say it isn't possible to find common ground though. Do you think healthy grass is green?
You may have misunderstood. Common ground is not the problem nor is it the object, although such things are of crucial important to most. If I'm interacting with someone who harbors the conception they might be in ignorance or even have something wrong, well then I might have something to offer that will help.
Strangely, though, even such a person thinks I have nothing of profit to offer them, rather than passing on their way they feel compelled to offer me something instead, even when I didn't ask. Really, what this communicates is that they do not, in reality, harbor such conceptions of self-doubt.
Jesus said, "Ask and ye shall receive." An invitation, in other words. He didn't say, "Listen, let me tell you jokers something...."
But thanks for the engagement. TTYL.