a) Sequence/sequi - "to follow"...if differently shaped matter (life) follows the same motion (inception towards death); then differences are becoming equalized.
b) Mirror/mirer - "to look"...looking/locking at something tempts one to ignore that its being moved within everything. Looking tempts the "eye of the beholder".
Few suggest sequences to tempt many to mirror suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
What's the deal with how come it's not the same
Perceivable generating perception implies the differentiation of sameness...consenting to suggested aka "making a deal" tempts one to ignore that.
Would the effects be similar if you had it in the Fibonacci shape instead.
Mass consent to suggested shapes by few aka symbolism affects many artificially, while distracting each from being effect within cause of nature.
Re: "fib-o-nacci...a fib (lie) of a nazi (ashkenazi).."
Really? It doesn't mean filius Bonacci or 'Son of Bonacci', his father?
You mean two numbers in sequence added together don't produce the next number in the sequence? That's amazing.
And now we learn that the formula is a lie perpetrated by a group who didn't even exist when the principle was re-discovered. Amazing how mathematicians in India came to the same hallucination in 200 B.C. They must have been secret nazis before their time. Is that what Bonacci means and he was a prophet?
Holy cow..............can't wait for that decode too.
Ones RE-sponse to ALL...not a question towards another.
It doesn't mean...
Holding onto meaning contradicts sequence/sequi - "to follow".
his father?
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
two numbers in sequence added together don't produce the next number in the sequence?
a) Name/nombre/number aka "designation of unit" implies unitas/unus - "one". There can be only one...unless ignored by following (sequi) another.
b) Nature produces each being by setting each one apart from one another...others tempt one to count suggested numbers together, while ignoring ONEself counting, which in return makes one accountable to another one...a chosen one.
c) Putting together doesn't produce...it re-produces off-spring, hence ones response to all production separating self (life) further down the line (inception towards death).
d) Artificial math tempts one to ignore real addition (inception of one); division (death of one); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring of one) and division (being one within all).
e) If energy implies one, then what would two represent? Double energy? How does counting energy together double it?
What if energy cannot be increased or decreased...only divided from all into each one? What if ones within energy can be tricked to ignore the oneness (singularity) of all energy by counting each other?
f) Who told you the history of "Fibonacci" and where do you store that story? What if he-brew his-story to make jew (phonetic you) fall for it, while ignoring that a moving nature cannot be stored?
What if any story tempts one to misuse mind/memory as a storage device?
the formula is a lie
Ones consent to suggested formula/form aka in-form-ation tempts one into a conflict of reason...truth vs lie, while ignoring perceivable in-spir-ation.
Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death), hence nature inspiring being to spir/spiro - "to breathe".
One does not follow (sequi/sequence) breathing...one resists being forced to adapt or falls for the wanted temptation to follow.
by a group
Nature separates each being from one another, hence each chosen one tempting the choices of gentiles to give mutual consent to a suggestion, which groups many together under control of few.
Nature implies first...and cannot be taken by any being within. A jew inverts this by suggesting gentiles to follow "principle", hence to being taken in by a mis-take.
b) Nature reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentile consent under cover of ignorance. Re-discover implies ones response (re) to the division (dis) of suggested covers aka a conflict of reason among gentiles.
when...in 200 B.C.
200 B.C. implies a suggested number held within a consenting gentiles mind, while ignoring that "when" implies NOW, cause ones perception within all perceivable can only work at this moment as matter (life) within the moment-um (inception towards death) of motion.
Being implies in-between before and after, hence a divergence...not a sequence. Christ furthermore implies "anointed one", hence separation of each one within oil/all as seed within s-oil.
been secret nazis
Nazi aka nati (native) + secret aka seco (to divide) implies be'en aka being native within division of all.
Nature doesn't keep secrets...it divides (seco) each being as native within all and foreigner to one another.
before their time
a) Before implies forwarded (inception towards death) being (life) aka temporal within ongoing. Suggested "time" tempts one to measure a temporal duration, while ignoring ongoing procession.
All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies "linear"...measuring the duration of time implies "circular".
a) All perceivable WAS before ones perception came into being...others suggest what IS to distract one from discerning self.
b) Mean/men - "to think"...a jew suggest meaning to tempt consenting gentiles to hold onto it, thereby establishing circular thinking (logic), which turns into conflicts of reason among gentiles.
c) A jew suggests prophet aka pro (forward) bha (to speak)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prophet to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words, which represents spell-craft.
If a gentile consents to a suggested PROPHET, then a suggesting jew makes PROFIT...hence exploiting sequence with a little fib-o-nacci...
You come close when you equate prophet with profit, but not how you think.
PR_(PH/F_T) Each word shares these sephira. The vowels are added to dis=tinguish....de-construct to show difference. The sephira show connection. Your use of guesswork numerology lacks this understanding and so falls short.
Each letter has sig-nificance that acts as a formula when mixed.
No you do not get that. And so your 'lessons' are sophomoric at best. Learn it. You're doing this wrong by working backwards from the word instead of learning how the word was actually constructed. You DE construct. Word.
And you really think you decoded fibonacci as a 'fib from a nazi'?
Your wordplay is childish false numerology with hits and misses as result.
Gematria and Divine Geometry on the other hand are the blueprints of matter that do matter. Raise up and learn it and all those words suddenly DO connect in a deeper way than sheer guessing which creates logical snares you'd feign to ignore.
Now be sure and equate all that down to 'inception towards death' as your final answer by design. You might as well say, "It doesn't matter, you're going to die." and really just 'circles back' on itself like a dog returning to its own vomit.
Only nature equates (inception towards death) differentials (life)...few invert it into equalizing differences among many by temping alike behavior.
Same (all perceivable) > difference (each ones perception) > likeness (ones consent to suggestion of another).
Each word shares
Share/sker - "to cut". Words are shaped by joining letters together, which tempts one to ignore sound cutting instruments apart from one another.
Being implies mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound. Letter also implies ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape letters into words to craft spells.
Word implies articulation of natural sound.
sephira
As in sefirot? Aka the attributes (perception) of God (perceivable) relating to each other (consent) in a scripted way (suggested)?
The issue with sephira/sefira - "to count"...enumeration tempts one to ignore self by counting others as more or less than one.
To be implies unit (one) within singularity (oneness)...apart from one another. To count makes one accountable to one another.
The vowels are added
a) Promise (vow) to God (el)...
b) Only nature adds (inception); subtracts (death); multiplies (intercourse for off-spring), and divides (from all into each one).
A being cannot add anything to everything nature offers.
de-construct to show difference
a) Nature gives sight to being...others make shows to tempt being to behold aka being holding onto shown, which distorts sight.
b) De (to divide) con (together) struct (to fit). Nature implies the process (inception towards death) of dividing beings (life) apart from one another. Few suggest structuralism to fit many together into an arrangement aka a turning of mind... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arrange
The sephira show connection.
The show must go...because ongoing nature (inception towards death) separates temporary beings (life) from one another; no matter what connections they show towards each other.
Your use of guesswork
Implication (if/then) over reason (vs) allows one to draw from inspiration perceived instead of letting others paint suggested information for one to hold onto.
A guess tempts one to take, while ignoring that all (perceivable) was given to each one (perception) for free will of choice.
Guessing inverts begotten with begetting.
numerology
Numero implies one; Logy implies one vs another within a conflict of reason.
There can be only one aka one for all and all for each one within.
lacks this understanding and so falls short
It's ones choice to stand-under which makes one fall short to another. Knowledge implies living on the edge of known, hence a balance act for ones reacting choice. Understanding tempts the submission of choice to another aka student under teacher; many under few; follower under leader; slave under master; gentile under jew...
Each letter has sig-nificance that acts as a formula when mixed.
In reality...solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life) by separation; a jew fixes and mixes suggested information within each consenting gentiles mind to "flush trouble down the drain".
b) Letters are not just symbolism aka fictitious signs (signi-fic), but also imply ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape words by mixing LETTERS together.
c) What's the opposite of formula? Deviation aka form (life) deviated within flow (inception towards death). Letting others shape formula tempts one to ignore flow.
No you do not get that
Coming into being implies "begotten", hence each one already GOT all has to offer when coming into being...it's wanting to GET from one another, which tempts one to ignore that.
To get implies "towards getting" aka forwards getting aka "for-getting"...
your 'lessons'
Being implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...few suggest lessons to lessen growth within loss by burdening one with suggested information held within mind/memory. Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, since it moves through each one, while allowing one to draw from it.
About free-will-of-choice...Post Score (0) Comment Score (13473) aka no lessons given, only adapting to what's already there.
You're doing this wrong by working backwards from the word
a) Work implies energy (internal/inherent power) aka action (inception towards death) generating reactions (life)...em (within) ploy (fold) ment (mind) implies ones adaptation to origin, hence "working backwards".
b) Suggestible words can only be shaped within perceivable sound...consenting to hold onto a word tempts one to ignore being moved within sound.
Holding onto a definition shapes one into a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound) aka sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all; everything".
Suggested words like "insane person" tempt one to ignore the implication of being in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound).
Free-will-of-choice simply breaks apart words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality) as to remain free by resisting the temptation of bind self to another.
how the word was actually
A word cannot act...it reacts to letter. Only nature acts, which allows each being within to react by free will of choice...hence also having the choice to LET others shape LETTERS into words. What's another word for letting? Consenting!
Fictional words distract from actual sound...if one chooses to ignore actual (perceivable) for fictional (suggested).
you really think you decoded
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) perceivable, not the encoding or decoding of suggested. Few suggest codes/codex to establish a conflict between statutory vs illegitimate. If many consent to such codes, then few are being permitted to use statutory delegitimisation of ones FREE will of choice.
Codes are used to artificially prohibit the use of free will of choice within nature...yet only upon those who willingly consent.
I did because all inspires one to re-do by free will of choice.
fibonacci as a 'fib from a nazi"
Instead of reason (true vs false); try implication (if/then) and continue until you'll run into any contradictions...the more one resists reason by using implication, the less CONTRA-dictions one will find within oneself. It's reason which tempts one against (contra) one another....
false numerology
False vs true implies circular thinking (logy) based on ones consent to suggested names/numbers (numero) by another one.
Free will of choice cannot choose a side without binding self to another within conflict...yet resisting the temptation to choose a suggested side prevents bondage.
matter that do matter
Only within the momentum (inception towards death) of motion, can matter (life) come into being.
Aka sharing (suggestion) and carrying (consent)...it doesn't matter; cause matter (perception) moves (perceivable).
creates logical snares
Like suggested creationism aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka creation out of nothing as the inversion of transformation (perception) within everything (perceivable)?
It's consent given to suggested by ones free will of choice which binds one to another. Suggestion ensnares perception...if consented to.
"It doesn't matter, you're going to die."
TO die implies living matter within motion being sentenced at inception towards point of death.
circles back
It ain't a circle of life; wheel of fortune; leap of faith; band of hope" as suggested, but each temporal bend (life) during an ongoing line (inception towards death), hence bending in (inception) and out (death) of shape (life).
A circle can only be shaped within a line. Holding onto a circle (logic) tempts one (perception) to ignore the line (perceivable).
a darkbot
Light (ones discernment)
Dark (ones ignorance)
Robot/robur/strength (ones free will of choice resisting the temptation of ignorance).
Trying to figure out how to get my computer setup in this shape.. you'd need a bigger room. Watching those documentaries about it, you'd see them in a tube thing that was sideways, not upright. But it wasn't twirled up. You could take that tube on the right and put it on the side and could sleep in there and it'd still be twirled up on top of you. You couldn't be on the inside part because it'd push down on the open side. It'd be close though. Kind of would be like in that middle pic, on the bottom there. Betcha you'd have some weird dreams.
Same motion differentiates shapes of matter.
a) Sequence/sequi - "to follow"...if differently shaped matter (life) follows the same motion (inception towards death); then differences are becoming equalized.
b) Mirror/mirer - "to look"...looking/locking at something tempts one to ignore that its being moved within everything. Looking tempts the "eye of the beholder".
Few suggest sequences to tempt many to mirror suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
Perceivable generating perception implies the differentiation of sameness...consenting to suggested aka "making a deal" tempts one to ignore that.
Mass consent to suggested shapes by few aka symbolism affects many artificially, while distracting each from being effect within cause of nature.
Aka fib-o-nacci...a fib (lie) of a nazi (ashkenazi)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/fib
Re: "fib-o-nacci...a fib (lie) of a nazi (ashkenazi).."
Really? It doesn't mean filius Bonacci or 'Son of Bonacci', his father?
You mean two numbers in sequence added together don't produce the next number in the sequence? That's amazing.
And now we learn that the formula is a lie perpetrated by a group who didn't even exist when the principle was re-discovered. Amazing how mathematicians in India came to the same hallucination in 200 B.C. They must have been secret nazis before their time. Is that what Bonacci means and he was a prophet?
Holy cow..............can't wait for that decode too.
Your definitions de-fine the point.
Ones RE-sponse to ALL...not a question towards another.
Holding onto meaning contradicts sequence/sequi - "to follow".
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
a) Name/nombre/number aka "designation of unit" implies unitas/unus - "one". There can be only one...unless ignored by following (sequi) another.
b) Nature produces each being by setting each one apart from one another...others tempt one to count suggested numbers together, while ignoring ONEself counting, which in return makes one accountable to another one...a chosen one.
c) Putting together doesn't produce...it re-produces off-spring, hence ones response to all production separating self (life) further down the line (inception towards death).
d) Artificial math tempts one to ignore real addition (inception of one); division (death of one); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring of one) and division (being one within all).
e) If energy implies one, then what would two represent? Double energy? How does counting energy together double it?
What if energy cannot be increased or decreased...only divided from all into each one? What if ones within energy can be tricked to ignore the oneness (singularity) of all energy by counting each other?
f) Who told you the history of "Fibonacci" and where do you store that story? What if he-brew his-story to make jew (phonetic you) fall for it, while ignoring that a moving nature cannot be stored?
What if any story tempts one to misuse mind/memory as a storage device?
Ones consent to suggested formula/form aka in-form-ation tempts one into a conflict of reason...truth vs lie, while ignoring perceivable in-spir-ation.
Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death), hence nature inspiring being to spir/spiro - "to breathe".
One does not follow (sequi/sequence) breathing...one resists being forced to adapt or falls for the wanted temptation to follow.
Nature separates each being from one another, hence each chosen one tempting the choices of gentiles to give mutual consent to a suggestion, which groups many together under control of few.
Each jew represents apartheid... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
Hence israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" aka each ones struggle within all to separate from one another.
Suggestion tempts consent into sequence...being implies divergence.
a) Principle aka primus (first) capere (to take)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/principle
Nature implies first...and cannot be taken by any being within. A jew inverts this by suggesting gentiles to follow "principle", hence to being taken in by a mis-take.
b) Nature reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentile consent under cover of ignorance. Re-discover implies ones response (re) to the division (dis) of suggested covers aka a conflict of reason among gentiles.
200 B.C. implies a suggested number held within a consenting gentiles mind, while ignoring that "when" implies NOW, cause ones perception within all perceivable can only work at this moment as matter (life) within the moment-um (inception towards death) of motion.
Being implies in-between before and after, hence a divergence...not a sequence. Christ furthermore implies "anointed one", hence separation of each one within oil/all as seed within s-oil.
Nazi aka nati (native) + secret aka seco (to divide) implies be'en aka being native within division of all.
Nature doesn't keep secrets...it divides (seco) each being as native within all and foreigner to one another.
a) Before implies forwarded (inception towards death) being (life) aka temporal within ongoing. Suggested "time" tempts one to measure a temporal duration, while ignoring ongoing procession.
All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies "linear"...measuring the duration of time implies "circular".
Sleight of hand: "We'll have some fun when the clock strikes one"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUgAxGaPXe4
a) All perceivable WAS before ones perception came into being...others suggest what IS to distract one from discerning self.
b) Mean/men - "to think"...a jew suggest meaning to tempt consenting gentiles to hold onto it, thereby establishing circular thinking (logic), which turns into conflicts of reason among gentiles.
c) A jew suggests prophet aka pro (forward) bha (to speak)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prophet to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words, which represents spell-craft.
If a gentile consents to a suggested PROPHET, then a suggesting jew makes PROFIT...hence exploiting sequence with a little fib-o-nacci...
Merely an hour...
You come close when you equate prophet with profit, but not how you think.
PR_(PH/F_T) Each word shares these sephira. The vowels are added to dis=tinguish....de-construct to show difference. The sephira show connection. Your use of guesswork numerology lacks this understanding and so falls short. Each letter has sig-nificance that acts as a formula when mixed.
No you do not get that. And so your 'lessons' are sophomoric at best. Learn it. You're doing this wrong by working backwards from the word instead of learning how the word was actually constructed. You DE construct. Word.
And you really think you decoded fibonacci as a 'fib from a nazi'?
Your wordplay is childish false numerology with hits and misses as result.
Gematria and Divine Geometry on the other hand are the blueprints of matter that do matter. Raise up and learn it and all those words suddenly DO connect in a deeper way than sheer guessing which creates logical snares you'd feign to ignore.
Now be sure and equate all that down to 'inception towards death' as your final answer by design. You might as well say, "It doesn't matter, you're going to die." and really just 'circles back' on itself like a dog returning to its own vomit.
If you aren't a darkbot, you missed your calling.
Only nature equates (inception towards death) differentials (life)...few invert it into equalizing differences among many by temping alike behavior.
Same (all perceivable) > difference (each ones perception) > likeness (ones consent to suggestion of another).
Share/sker - "to cut". Words are shaped by joining letters together, which tempts one to ignore sound cutting instruments apart from one another.
Being implies mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound. Letter also implies ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape letters into words to craft spells.
Word implies articulation of natural sound.
As in sefirot? Aka the attributes (perception) of God (perceivable) relating to each other (consent) in a scripted way (suggested)?
The issue with sephira/sefira - "to count"...enumeration tempts one to ignore self by counting others as more or less than one.
To be implies unit (one) within singularity (oneness)...apart from one another. To count makes one accountable to one another.
a) Promise (vow) to God (el)...
b) Only nature adds (inception); subtracts (death); multiplies (intercourse for off-spring), and divides (from all into each one).
A being cannot add anything to everything nature offers.
a) Nature gives sight to being...others make shows to tempt being to behold aka being holding onto shown, which distorts sight.
b) De (to divide) con (together) struct (to fit). Nature implies the process (inception towards death) of dividing beings (life) apart from one another. Few suggest structuralism to fit many together into an arrangement aka a turning of mind... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arrange
The show must go...because ongoing nature (inception towards death) separates temporary beings (life) from one another; no matter what connections they show towards each other.
Implication (if/then) over reason (vs) allows one to draw from inspiration perceived instead of letting others paint suggested information for one to hold onto.
A guess tempts one to take, while ignoring that all (perceivable) was given to each one (perception) for free will of choice.
Guessing inverts begotten with begetting.
Numero implies one; Logy implies one vs another within a conflict of reason.
There can be only one aka one for all and all for each one within.
It's ones choice to stand-under which makes one fall short to another. Knowledge implies living on the edge of known, hence a balance act for ones reacting choice. Understanding tempts the submission of choice to another aka student under teacher; many under few; follower under leader; slave under master; gentile under jew...
a) "There's not a problem that I can't fix...'Cause I can do it in the mix"... https://genius.com/Indeep-last-night-a-dj-saved-my-life-lyrics
In reality...solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life) by separation; a jew fixes and mixes suggested information within each consenting gentiles mind to "flush trouble down the drain".
b) Letters are not just symbolism aka fictitious signs (signi-fic), but also imply ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape words by mixing LETTERS together.
c) What's the opposite of formula? Deviation aka form (life) deviated within flow (inception towards death). Letting others shape formula tempts one to ignore flow.
Coming into being implies "begotten", hence each one already GOT all has to offer when coming into being...it's wanting to GET from one another, which tempts one to ignore that.
To get implies "towards getting" aka forwards getting aka "for-getting"...
Being implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...few suggest lessons to lessen growth within loss by burdening one with suggested information held within mind/memory. Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, since it moves through each one, while allowing one to draw from it.
About free-will-of-choice...Post Score (0) Comment Score (13473) aka no lessons given, only adapting to what's already there.
a) Work implies energy (internal/inherent power) aka action (inception towards death) generating reactions (life)...em (within) ploy (fold) ment (mind) implies ones adaptation to origin, hence "working backwards".
b) Suggestible words can only be shaped within perceivable sound...consenting to hold onto a word tempts one to ignore being moved within sound.
Holding onto a definition shapes one into a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound) aka sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all; everything".
Suggested words like "insane person" tempt one to ignore the implication of being in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound).
Free-will-of-choice simply breaks apart words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality) as to remain free by resisting the temptation of bind self to another.
A word cannot act...it reacts to letter. Only nature acts, which allows each being within to react by free will of choice...hence also having the choice to LET others shape LETTERS into words. What's another word for letting? Consenting!
Fictional words distract from actual sound...if one chooses to ignore actual (perceivable) for fictional (suggested).
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) perceivable, not the encoding or decoding of suggested. Few suggest codes/codex to establish a conflict between statutory vs illegitimate. If many consent to such codes, then few are being permitted to use statutory delegitimisation of ones FREE will of choice.
Codes are used to artificially prohibit the use of free will of choice within nature...yet only upon those who willingly consent.
I did because all inspires one to re-do by free will of choice.
Instead of reason (true vs false); try implication (if/then) and continue until you'll run into any contradictions...the more one resists reason by using implication, the less CONTRA-dictions one will find within oneself. It's reason which tempts one against (contra) one another....
False vs true implies circular thinking (logy) based on ones consent to suggested names/numbers (numero) by another one.
Free will of choice cannot choose a side without binding self to another within conflict...yet resisting the temptation to choose a suggested side prevents bondage.
Only within the momentum (inception towards death) of motion, can matter (life) come into being.
"It doesn't matter...cause if you ain't sharin, people ain't carin"... https://genius.com/Wyclef-jean-it-doesnt-matter-lyrics
Aka sharing (suggestion) and carrying (consent)...it doesn't matter; cause matter (perception) moves (perceivable).
Like suggested creationism aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka creation out of nothing as the inversion of transformation (perception) within everything (perceivable)?
It's consent given to suggested by ones free will of choice which binds one to another. Suggestion ensnares perception...if consented to.
TO die implies living matter within motion being sentenced at inception towards point of death.
It ain't a circle of life; wheel of fortune; leap of faith; band of hope" as suggested, but each temporal bend (life) during an ongoing line (inception towards death), hence bending in (inception) and out (death) of shape (life).
A circle can only be shaped within a line. Holding onto a circle (logic) tempts one (perception) to ignore the line (perceivable).
Trying to figure out how to get my computer setup in this shape.. you'd need a bigger room. Watching those documentaries about it, you'd see them in a tube thing that was sideways, not upright. But it wasn't twirled up. You could take that tube on the right and put it on the side and could sleep in there and it'd still be twirled up on top of you. You couldn't be on the inside part because it'd push down on the open side. It'd be close though. Kind of would be like in that middle pic, on the bottom there. Betcha you'd have some weird dreams.