implication and reason can be used at once.

a) Hence "once and for all" aka all forwarding each once/ones within.

b) Can be used implies being enabled to re-use by free will of choice, yet implication re-uses motion, while reason re-uses matter...the former implies ones lifeline, while the latter represents the ouroboros eating its own tail, while moving in circles.

It's few who suggest many to ignore linear thinking for "the circle of life; the wheel of fortune; the band of hope; the leap of faith"... https://genius.com/Elton-john-circle-of-life-lyrics

To believe...

...represents the prerequisite for entering any conflict of reason. Being implies within implication aka within (im) fold (plica) of action (tion).

If nature; then being....only then can being enter reason by believing one another's suggestions, which by artificial intrigue tempts one to ignore nature. It's ones free will of choice tho...

implication and reason somehow "contradict"

Can you show any reason without conflict/contra aka without one side turned against another?

Meanwhile...how could if/then be in contradistinction to one another?