The natural way is "inspiration AS WELL AS reasoning against one another". One can do "imply" and "reasoning".

a) Nature WAS perceivable before one can suggest what IS.

b) Only nature does...implication allows one to redo self; while reason tempts one to redo another in.

c) Well implies each ones will...as implies "as it where" aka as all was before each ones will comes into being.

The issue is using "as well as" to draw comparisons between implication and reason, while ignoring that reason draws together, while implication sets apart.